It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: datguy
a reply to: quintessentone
but the text of the law does not deny equal education, unless all of a sudden your saying that homosexuality is new lesson in third grade?
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: quintessentone
I'm still waiting for you to tell me what you think talent is from earlier today.
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: datguy
a reply to: quintessentone
no, no its not, from your own source
February 2023: Judge Winsor dismissed an amended complaint and entered judgment against the plaintiffs.
literally 30 seconds to read that entire article and you dont even know whats in it?
There is a later article where it's headed to an appeals court. You can't take away one person's rights to appease others' beliefs or bias'.
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: quintessentone
I'm still waiting for you to tell me what you think talent is from earlier today.
I answered that, it depends on the activity or sport.
originally posted by: datguy
a reply to: quintessentone
im reading the text of HB 1557, it does not deny equal education as i said, unless teachers are now teaching 3rd graders to be gay....
and you still havent answered whether or not you think the schools should have more rights over the kids than their parents
also the 2nd source you refer to states that it is arguable. I would argue that teaching 3rd graders to be gay or convince them they are unicorns is not part of any equal education
originally posted by: ketsuko
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: quintessentone
I'm still waiting for you to tell me what you think talent is from earlier today.
I answered that, it depends on the activity or sport.
No, it doesn't. It's actually pretty simple. You're making it complex to avoid the question.
D. The Right to Equal Treatment and Equal Protection for LGBTQ Youth
The right for students to be out in school undoubtedly bolsters the proposition that no-promo-homo laws are unconstitutional, and indeed, is likely enough to establish their unconstitutionality independent of other
considerations. There is also a strong argument to be made, however, that because these laws are based on animus, they are independently unconstitutional under the Fourteenth Amendment's guarantee of equal protection.1
originally posted by: JAGStorm
a reply to: frogs453
The grandparents should have been removed and banned.
These sports need to verify or accept at the beginning of the season and that’s it.
I don’t care what side you are on, humiliating these kids while everyone watches is as cruel as it gets.
Checking children’s private areas is not acceptable, period.
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: putnam6
originally posted by: quintessentone
a reply to: putnam6
Adults can deal with these issues themselves but young children are witnessing anti-LGBTQ hate and intolerance and that is not right. If someone has an issue go through the proper channels away from the children, is all I'm saying. Well, of course along with all the hypocrisy that is evident within society.
Respectfully I don't hate anybody, I certainly have empathy for a troubled, confused kid with raging feelings who is bullied just because. It however doesn't mean this troubled, confused kid with raging feelings gets to beat the crap out of the female student body literally and figuratively.
I understand there is the hate aspect there, but that is different than competing in sports. FWIW I got daughters, just talking with them over the years the stereotypical LGBTQ hate has gone down quite a bit from when I was a kid in the 70s and 80s to when they were children and teens in the 90s and 2000s. I have family members who teach middle and high school, and both have plenty of LGBTQ students.
Hell, I was bullied some in school cause I was a little kid, nothing like what these children in this situation experience, but yea I still think about it 50 years later. I know we need to cut the hate, but respectfully athletics is how lots of teens handle all those hormones and emotions. We haven't even mentioned the actual trans-only numbers here either, they have to be minuscule it's probably a lot less than 3% because there is no way even a high school with 1000 students has 30 male-to-female transgenders who have the urge to compete against genetic females. It's probably closer to 4-5 tops.
As I said my focus is just the male-to-female trans in the elementary, middle, and high school sports area only. If a middle school male-to-female trans wants to be in the girls' chorus got no problem with that, they aren't dressing around each other or beating the crap out of girls because they have a genetic and hormonal advantage.
Then I see reports such as at the link and wonder, who is really getting the sharp end of the spear.
williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu...
originally posted by: Klassified
a reply to: frogs453
So a pair of older people, who aren't even part of the school district make asses of themselves in front of a crowd of people lending credence to the meme that anyone who disagrees with the trans agenda are "right-wing crazies". How convenient.
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: quintessentone
Yeah, it's called the "don't say gay bill" in Florida that have you leftists crapping yourselves in your skinny jeans.
I'm not a leftist and I haven't read it because it's in Florida, where it should be.
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: Lumenari
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: datguy
a reply to: quintessentone
a claim of 7 people represented as plaintiffs, a gay couple and their kids, and 2 teachers from the same school district, likely the same school, so when you ask if i think its not the parents making the challenge, no i do not think 7 poeple in collusion represent the whole of the state, i guess we shall see but...its not looking good
again, from your own source
“Plaintiffs have shown a strident disagreement with the new law, and they have alleged facts to show its very existence causes them deep hurt and disappointment,” Winsor wrote. “But to invoke a federal court’s jurisdiction, they must allege more. Their failure to do so requires dismissal.”
and that still doesnt answer, do you think the school should have more rights over the children than the parents?
Do you think children's rights should be respected?
Please quote for me in the Constitution a child's rights in the United States.
This for a start:
The challenge to the 2022 law contends that it violated constitutional due-process, equal-protection and First Amendment rights, along with a federal law known as Title IX, which bars sex-based discrimination in education programs.
Plaintiffs in the revised version of the case, filed in October, are two students in Miami-Dade County and Manatee County schools, two lesbian couples with children in Miami-Dade County schools, a woman with children in Orange County schools and two teachers in Broward County and Pasco County schools. The defendants are the State Board of Education, the Florida Department of Education and the school boards in Broward, Manatee, Miami-Dade, Orange and Pasco counties.
The lawsuit alleged the plaintiffs have suffered “concrete harms” from the 2022 law.
“They have been denied equal educational opportunities they would like to receive, in the curriculum and beyond, and they have been subjected to a discriminatory educational environment that treats LGBTQ people and issues as something to be shunned and avoided, on pain of discipline and liability,” the lawsuit said. “This type of overtly discriminatory treatment has no place in a free democratic society and should not be permitted to stand.”
www.wlrn.org...
Basically denying LGBTQ children equal educational opportunities.
originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: igloo
Another article. The man has been banned from all school events.
CBC News
He denies it. However the original Facebook post had comments from others there stating it did occur. He's also now receiving pushback and his business is as well
Of course he's going to back peddle.
I mean you can feel it's suspect. But considering people knock over pride displays, groups were outside of schools on video screaming at students who were wearing masks during the pandemic, is it really that hard to believe?
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: ketsuko
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: quintessentone
I'm still waiting for you to tell me what you think talent is from earlier today.
I answered that, it depends on the activity or sport.
No, it doesn't. It's actually pretty simple. You're making it complex to avoid the question.
No it's not simple, because how do you determine talent vs skill sets learned from training. Natural talent is difficult to define. How about you give an example.