Heated protests in North Hollywood over Pride assembly at elementary school

a reply to: quintessentone

Studies must have simple logic and well defined terms. If someone has an obsession with same sex, child or otherwise, they are also homosexual, by definition. The are lying when they say they are straight, unless people who have same sex relatons with minors are somehow under the straight umbrella.

You do understand that If A = B and C = A then B = C

originally posted by: CoyoteAngels
a reply to: quintessentone

Studies must have simple logic and well defined terms. If someone has an obsession with same sex, child or otherwise, they are also homosexual, by definition. The are lying when they say they are straight, unless people who have same sex relatons with minors are somehow under the straight umbrella.

You do understand that If A = B and C = A then B = C

Where do you categorize poly people?

a reply to: quintessentone

We established way back there, that this was about more than a book. It was about a Pride Month assembly.

So we are going in circles.

a reply to: quintessentone

I don't know! I don't know what poly people are!

Are they straight too?

originally posted by: CoyoteAngels
a reply to: quintessentone

We established way back there, that this was about more than a book. It was about a Pride Month assembly.

So we are going in circles.

You didn't answer: Do you have kids??? Im betting you do not.

Why do you think the LGBTQ community thought it necessary to have an assembly in front of that school? This does not take much thinking about.

a reply to: quintessentone

Because they like to force their views on everyone else? Because they like to start sh**?

originally posted by: CoyoteAngels
a reply to: quintessentone

Because they like to force their views on everyone else? Because they like to start sh**?

Nope. Well I think I will leave you with that thought as I have better things to do.

a reply to: quintessentone

the school was having an assembly, it wasn't an assembly of LGBTQ activists. Parents showed up to protest the assembly, the LGBTQ showed up to counter protest the parents.

Why do you insist on twisting facts? Cant win the arguement any other way, eh?

Have a great Saturday!

originally posted by: CoyoteAngels
a reply to: quintessentone

the school was having an assembly, it wasn't an assembly of LGBTQ activists. Parents showed up to protest the assembly, the LGBTQ showed up to counter protest the parents.

Why do you insist on twisting facts? Cant win the arguement any other way, eh?

Have a great Saturday!

It's not about winning, it's about getting the fact right.

You have a great day too.

a reply to: quintessentone

You're perception of the facts isnt accurate!

originally posted by: CoyoteAngels
a reply to: quintessentone

You're perception of the facts isnt accurate!

We need to have a look at that book that parents are up in arms about. Because this is what it is all about, that one reference to 2 moms and 2 dads that has some parents going off the rails.

a reply to: LordAhriman

Which simply makes them liars as well. Not straight.

a reply to: quintessentone

Its more than just about a book, you've been told and you purposely just overlook the facts presented in the video for that one LGBTQ activists statement about this being about a book. It was about a Pride Month Assembly. Go review the sourced KTLA link again before continuing to minimize the facts and lie by omission.

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: CoyoteAngels
a reply to: quintessentone

Why not opt-in to the gay stuff?

It's not gay stuff, it's diversity and inclusiveness within different family dynamics. Any other questions from children should be answered by parents. But parents, it seems, don't know how to explain it or simply don't want to face the realities of life.

...It's literally gay stuff.

Oh and your responses all sound like they are written by an A.I. program, with all the current political and LGBTQLMNOP buzzwords written into the code.

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: CoyoteAngels
a reply to: quintessentone

Why not opt-in to the gay stuff?

It's not gay stuff, it's diversity and inclusiveness within different family dynamics. Any other questions from children should be answered by parents. But parents, it seems, don't know how to explain it or simply don't want to face the realities of life.

So the way to be included is to be excluded?

Why do we need it at all? How does it prepare anyone for the future more than reading, writing, and arithmetic? Are the school's students proficient in all their base subjects to be wasting time on social engineering?

originally posted by: ColeYounger
a reply to: quintessentone

Thanks for posting the link. I find it curious that burning the flag itself isn't a crime, but the "circumstances around the burning" may constitute a hate crime. Again, WTF???

oh,
it's the intent!

originally posted by: quintessentone
The fact is that any family that does not want their child to view any videos or books about diversity, have the option to have their child not attend. Problem solved.

This is a viable option anywhere that has real school choice - meaning, gets full tax credits that allows them to take their tax dollars to their school of choice.

But this simply isn't an option for most who don't have school choice. Paying for private schools is very expensive - I know, because we were already paying for private schools (could barely afford it). That said, we were forced into homeschooling when the terrorists closed down our schools, so they ended up forcing us into saving a ton of money.

They need to keep this stuff away from kids and schools, PERIOD. If the "opinion and belief engineering" is so important to this segment, do it where it belongs....in church

originally posted by: quintessentone
a reply to: CoyoteAngels
They could have just opted their children out of reading time and video time. Why go to all that trouble when what they wanted could actually be achieved with opting out?

First, they have to actually know that this garbage is happening to even be able to attempt to 'opt their kids out', and since schools have decided they have the right to hide this kind of garbage from parents, and their attempts to 'opt-out' would almost certainly fail, your disingenuous attempt to claim that parents have a choice is exposed for exactly what it is... full on raging support for the garbage agenda being forced on children.

Second - while garbage like this shouldn't even be in the schools, at a bare minimum, it should be opt-IN, not opt-out.

originally posted by: quintessentone
a reply to: CoyoteAngels
We all know what 'leave kids alone' really means and grooming is not what is going on in that school.

'We' do?

Teaching children the dynamics of different family units is in no way grooming.

Said the groomer...