It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: ketsuko
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: linda72
originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: linda72
I have to agree, this is just bonkers.
No one seems to use the term "Political Correctness" any more.
This is PC gone mad.
I blame the Snowflake generation.
We have this nonsense here in the UK.
news.sky.com...
This is a good phrase I often forget! Snowflake generation it is.
But the problem is real n serious when they try to silence Kathleen Stock n every other academic who speaks against the gender ideology by just stating facts.
This Olivia student needs to not sign up for liberal arts courses, there problem solved.
I recall when a grounding in the liberal arts was a noble thing. Now it's trash and you just confirmed it.
originally posted by: Terpene
a reply to: linda72
The problem with adding, the socially constructed term, women to biological, is that you exclude the person that was born with two xx but is not a woman.
I can see how she would use that in a solid yet discriminatory argument.
Maybe when referring to the necessity of a binary system for sexual reproduction it would be wise to use the scientific terms. Like an xx and a xy person.
She must have posted her work for all to see and judge for themselfs?
No?
Well then i call agenda, and by the looks of it, Republicans might bank on that topic for the next elections...
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: ketsuko
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: linda72
originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: linda72
I have to agree, this is just bonkers.
No one seems to use the term "Political Correctness" any more.
This is PC gone mad.
I blame the Snowflake generation.
We have this nonsense here in the UK.
news.sky.com...
This is a good phrase I often forget! Snowflake generation it is.
But the problem is real n serious when they try to silence Kathleen Stock n every other academic who speaks against the gender ideology by just stating facts.
This Olivia student needs to not sign up for liberal arts courses, there problem solved.
I recall when a grounding in the liberal arts was a noble thing. Now it's trash and you just confirmed it.
Go to this Olivia's tik tok page and her far reaching agenda is plain for all to see. She is just a sh** disturber for the conversative base and this looks like a planned agenda to me.
originally posted by: quintessentone
a reply to: linda72
What course was she taking? Why hasn't she appealed the grade? Why isn't she providing the teacher's reasoning for the grade? Please provide answers to these questions so we can dig deeper.
originally posted by: linda72
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: ketsuko
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: linda72
originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: linda72
I have to agree, this is just bonkers.
No one seems to use the term "Political Correctness" any more.
This is PC gone mad.
I blame the Snowflake generation.
We have this nonsense here in the UK.
news.sky.com...
This is a good phrase I often forget! Snowflake generation it is.
But the problem is real n serious when they try to silence Kathleen Stock n every other academic who speaks against the gender ideology by just stating facts.
This Olivia student needs to not sign up for liberal arts courses, there problem solved.
I recall when a grounding in the liberal arts was a noble thing. Now it's trash and you just confirmed it.
Go to this Olivia's tik tok page and her far reaching agenda is plain for all to see. She is just a sh** disturber for the conversative base and this looks like a planned agenda to me.
You keep referring to Olivia like someone with an agenda but there is no agenda.
You are trying a lot to give support to the people on tik-tok and the gender ideology but the more these stories surface the more the gender ideology is exposed.
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: linda72
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: ketsuko
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: linda72
originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: linda72
I have to agree, this is just bonkers.
No one seems to use the term "Political Correctness" any more.
This is PC gone mad.
I blame the Snowflake generation.
We have this nonsense here in the UK.
news.sky.com...
This is a good phrase I often forget! Snowflake generation it is.
But the problem is real n serious when they try to silence Kathleen Stock n every other academic who speaks against the gender ideology by just stating facts.
This Olivia student needs to not sign up for liberal arts courses, there problem solved.
I recall when a grounding in the liberal arts was a noble thing. Now it's trash and you just confirmed it.
Go to this Olivia's tik tok page and her far reaching agenda is plain for all to see. She is just a sh** disturber for the conversative base and this looks like a planned agenda to me.
You keep referring to Olivia like someone with an agenda but there is no agenda.
You are trying a lot to give support to the people on tik-tok and the gender ideology but the more these stories surface the more the gender ideology is exposed.
Her tik tok footprint is all we have to go on to assess her intentions. She will not comment to the magazine Evie, she won't reveal the school, course, or prof. name. How are we to assess the situation with no leads?
originally posted by: strongfp
a reply to: linda72
The student can easily use this wacky term as a case to get her paper graded properly.
"Heteronormativity"
Heteronormativity is the concept that heterosexuality is the preferred or normal mode of sexual orientation.[1] It assumes the gender binary (i.e., that there are only two distinct, opposite genders) and that sexual and marital relations are most fitting between people of opposite sex
A concept, not an actual widely accepted academic term, a concept made up by post modernists to try and take away the fact that humans have sex to procreate, and that's called a heterosexual act, sex between a biological man and woman is heterosexual!
But wait, the concept double downs:
Heteronormativity creates and upholds a social hierarchy based on sexual orientation with the practice and belief that heterosexuality is deemed as the societal norm
Most of humanity is heterosexual!
This is getting ridiculous.
en.wikipedia.org...
originally posted by: linda72
originally posted by: quintessentone
a reply to: linda72
What course was she taking? Why hasn't she appealed the grade? Why isn't she providing the teacher's reasoning for the grade? Please provide answers to these questions so we can dig deeper.
Simply because it is more than likely there is a formal complaint on the way
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: linda72
originally posted by: quintessentone
a reply to: linda72
What course was she taking? Why hasn't she appealed the grade? Why isn't she providing the teacher's reasoning for the grade? Please provide answers to these questions so we can dig deeper.
Simply because it is more than likely there is a formal complaint on the way
More than likely you don't know what the hell is going on with this.
originally posted by: linda72
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: linda72
originally posted by: quintessentone
a reply to: linda72
What course was she taking? Why hasn't she appealed the grade? Why isn't she providing the teacher's reasoning for the grade? Please provide answers to these questions so we can dig deeper.
Simply because it is more than likely there is a formal complaint on the way
More than likely you don't know what the hell is going on with this.
Having worked in academia for a number of years I am sure I know well the complaint procedures.
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: linda72
I have to agree, this is just bonkers.
No one seems to use the term "Political Correctness" any more.
This is PC gone mad.
I blame the Snowflake generation.
The folks on Reddit are saying that she is a transphobic with an agenda and just trying to stir up sh**.
Olivia, this is a solid proposal. However, the terms 'biological women' are exclusionary and are not allowed in this course as they further reinforce heteronormativity."
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: CoyoteAngels
a reply to: quintessentone
Since we are striving to be so open minded that we will throw out science for fantasy, whats to stop someone from identifying as a different race so they can get in on the reparations grab early?
Are you that open minded? Its DNA, afterall, and that should be completely meaningless compared to how we FEEL inside, and I feel oppressed.
What if the anti-LGBTQ protesters won the right to ban the books and videos teaching diversity and inclusiveness in the school, they deem inappropriate? Would not the LGBTQ parents then feel oppressed? It works both ways. They have the freedom to have their children opt out of the reading/videos and that should be the end of it, not to take away others' rights to have their children taught as they see fit.
originally posted by: CoyoteAngels
a reply to: Jason79
Pay $1500 to bend the knee.
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: linda72
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: linda72
originally posted by: quintessentone
a reply to: linda72
What course was she taking? Why hasn't she appealed the grade? Why isn't she providing the teacher's reasoning for the grade? Please provide answers to these questions so we can dig deeper.
Simply because it is more than likely there is a formal complaint on the way
More than likely you don't know what the hell is going on with this.
Having worked in academia for a number of years I am sure I know well the complaint procedures.
Is a student and prof. allowed to email each other while a complaint has been lodged?
originally posted by: coop039
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: CoyoteAngels
a reply to: quintessentone
Since we are striving to be so open minded that we will throw out science for fantasy, whats to stop someone from identifying as a different race so they can get in on the reparations grab early?
Are you that open minded? Its DNA, afterall, and that should be completely meaningless compared to how we FEEL inside, and I feel oppressed.
What if the anti-LGBTQ protesters won the right to ban the books and videos teaching diversity and inclusiveness in the school, they deem inappropriate? Would not the LGBTQ parents then feel oppressed? It works both ways. They have the freedom to have their children opt out of the reading/videos and that should be the end of it, not to take away others' rights to have their children taught as they see fit.
So youre ok with whites going "transblack" to get some reparation money.
originally posted by: Terpene
a reply to: linda72
The problem with adding, the socially constructed term, women to biological, is that you exclude the person that was born with two xx but is not a woman.
I can see how she would use that in a solid yet discriminatory argument.
Maybe when referring to the necessity of a binary system for sexual reproduction it would be wise to use the scientific terms. Like an xx and a xy person.
She must have posted her work for all to see and judge for themselfs?
No?
Well then i call agenda, and by the looks of it, Republicans might bank on that topic for the next elections...