Trump Knew the Proper Protocol for Declassifying Records

originally posted by: Sookiechacha

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: CoyoteAngels

POTUS can write EOs to change policy in the executive any time he wants.

Any EOs Trump wrote and signed would be a matter of public record. Got a record of his EO that gives President Trump the right to declassify documents with his mind, or actions?

1st page,1st response.

Any presidential plenary powers the president may, or may not have, do not exempt the President's EOs from the public record. Got that public record?

Your framing is wrong, that's the point:

Got a record of his EO that gives President Trump the right to declassify documents with his mind, or actions?

A POTUS doesn't need an EO.

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Annee
It’s the law.
It’s not in dispute.
You denying such makes you look looney.
It’s why I prefaced my post with respect.
Please take a moment, you are not a flat earther.

Obviously -- it is in dispute.

And will be settled by SCOTUS.

No it’s not…

No it won’t be…

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: network dude

Leaving something that you neither packed nor unpacked, untouched for years shows intent?

Do you know how important Joe's vette is to him? It's hard to believe he would let anyone just throw boxes of classified documents around his garage that he stored his CORVETTE in. But then, I suppose the question of how did classified documents make it out of the SCIF would also be a question. Seems like it would take "intent" to shove them down your pants, no?

Someone I used to do work for snuck a document out in his sock (seriously… it happened) and got in a wee bit of trouble for it back in the early oughts… PedoPete had boxes… so it should be exponentially worse for him… except he’s a Chinese puppet… so nothing will happen…

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: RazorV66

You say as you deflect from the fact that Jack Smith has built up a pretty strong case against Trump.

Yeah… Mueller had one of those too… how’d that work out for ya… 🤣🤣🤣

a reply to: JinMI

Oh. Okay. You got a memorandum?

Memorandum on Declassification of Certain Materials Related to the FBI’s Crossfire Hurricane Investigation

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: RazorV66

There's been enough evidence presented that not only did a judge order that attorney-client be pierced due to the crime-fraud exception, multiple times, but also ordered the former VP to testify before a grand jury.

None of those actions would have been taken if Smith had nothing.

And that's before we get into the number of Trump lawyers that have jumped ship (the latest was yesterday) or been required to lawyer up themselves.

Let me guess… the FBI never lied to a FISA court either to conduct a witch hunt huh… Jesus this is better comedy than SNL has had in decades…

Question. So if he declassified with no order and doesn't have to tell anyone, how will the appropriate departments know? How will information that must be redacted occur? I mean even though we can see he's not that bright, we do see from orders he's actually officially requested that he is aware that people need to know and info needs to be redacted.

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: JinMI

Oh. Okay. You got a memorandum?

Memorandum on Declassification of Certain Materials Related to the FBI’s Crossfire Hurricane Investigation

Again, 1st page, 1st response.

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: RazorV66

Sure. If this ends up being a nothingburger I'll apologize.

Now how about you tell us what you've been right about in any of these cases.

See Durham report… there’s plenty more… but boom… goes… the dynamite… 🤣🤣🤣

originally posted by: xuenchen
They deflections and "what ifs" are getting thicker 😍

Almost nearing Hillary’s cankle volume… 🤣🤣🤣

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: JinMI

Oh. Okay. You got a memorandum?

Memorandum on Declassification of Certain Materials Related to the FBI’s Crossfire Hurricane Investigation

Again, 1st page, 1st response.

I wonder why the DOJ and Special Counsel Jack Smith are unaware of such plenary rights?

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: CoyoteAngels

POTUS is the top dawg in the executive.

POTUS takes an oath to uphold and enforce the laws of the United States Government, not to dictate law, not write laws on the spot and in secret.

Do you know what an “executive order” is… I’m guessing not… you’re hero Zero signed hundreds of them… if they’re illegal than lock the usurper up… 🤣🤣🤣

originally posted by: Sookiechacha

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: JinMI

Oh. Okay. You got a memorandum?

Memorandum on Declassification of Certain Materials Related to the FBI’s Crossfire Hurricane Investigation

Again, 1st page, 1st response.

I wonder why the DOJ and Special Counsel Jack Smith are unaware of such plenary rights?

I'll bet you do.


History and precedent tell you why.

originally posted by: Sookiechacha

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: JinMI

Oh. Okay. You got a memorandum?

Memorandum on Declassification of Certain Materials Related to the FBI’s Crossfire Hurricane Investigation

Again, 1st page, 1st response.

I wonder why the DOJ and Special Counsel Jack Smith are unaware of such plenary rights?

what new things should we be expecting from Jack Smith?

originally posted by: Sookiechacha

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: JinMI

Oh. Okay. You got a memorandum?

Memorandum on Declassification of Certain Materials Related to the FBI’s Crossfire Hurricane Investigation

Again, 1st page, 1st response.

I wonder why the DOJ and Special Counsel Jack Smith are unaware of such plenary rights?

Have you met our DoJ? Since when do they even care about anything like laws and rights? They thumb their collective noses at Americans, Congress people, anyone they don't agree with. They agree with the laws and rights that serve them politically right now, not their chosen, on orders enemies.

originally posted by: Sookiechacha

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: JinMI

Oh. Okay. You got a memorandum?

Memorandum on Declassification of Certain Materials Related to the FBI’s Crossfire Hurricane Investigation

Again, 1st page, 1st response.

I wonder why the DOJ and Special Counsel Jack Smith are unaware of such plenary rights?

I wonder why the FBI/DOJ knew Trump was not colluding with Russia but pushed the narrative anyway… witches gonna hunt… not sure how you’re missing that… 🤣🤣🤣

a reply to: SwissMarked

34 indictments.

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: SwissMarked

34 indictments.

25 nebulous russians and "lying to the FBI" for the rest.


Imagine if equal application were applicable.......

a reply to: SwissMarked

Have you read the Mueller Report?

a reply to: Xcalibur254

With convictions that were made with false information based on the latest from Durham...and Cohen who we know is dirty.