a reply to:
MountainLaurel
a reply to:
Guyfriday
I watched Ye's brief appearance on the Timcast. Haven't seen the Frid interview yet, where he supposedly rambles on about it for an hour or two.
I get the impression of someone who means well, but is misinformed, and has public communication skills issues in the bargain. Perhaps he's being
given poor advice as well. Like Tim Pool said after Ye walked off, Ye doesn't need them. If it were me though, and I wanted to reach as wide an
audience as possible with a truth I thought it was vitally important for the public to hear, I would not have walked off set at the first instance of
an erroneously perceived slight.
That shows poor judgement. Ye does appear to be highly intelligent though. Of course, he rolled in there with Yanopolous and Fuentes looking over
his shoulder, and they promptly departed shortly after he did. I can't help but wonder what influence they might have on some of his judgement calls.
Based on the game he spittin', I don't think I have to wonder very hard to presume that they are heavily influencing the direction of his research.
The 'It's all the Jews!' theory does tend to converge with white supremacy propaganda often.
That's not to condemn Yanopolous or Fuentes, nor to defend them. I know they both make 'racy' comments, and that at least Fuentes is considered to be
some sort of white supremacist mouth piece or some such. I don't know enough about either to make an informed decision. Regardless, these characters
may also be the tools of larger players in this sick game. They may be useful pawns for manipulation of public opinion, and encouraged and well paid
precisely to achieve that end. Tools using tools? Perhaps...
Perhaps then Guy, he is being misdirected in the same way that Fuentes and Yano may be. A poison apple I would call it, not sure what the typical
info warfare term for it would be. People accept their flawed truths as 'the truth', and are then effectively demonized by any interested third party
who wishes to do so.
a reply to:
interupt42
a reply to:
Justoneman
Interesting theory I42. I think he might just be misdirected and being 'handled' in a different way than he was before, and actually means well, but
you could be right.
Do you know if he was right on the money previously with calling out the corruption and exposing globalist dogma? If so, and he is now changing his
presentation, that tends to support your theory over mine.
Just to be clear, I'm well aware of the historical connection of ethnic Jews and the religion of Judaism to the globalist conspiracy. I'm also well
aware that those players are only a small part of what appears to be, ultimately, a transnational conspiracy, and not a Jewish conspiracy.
Plenty of professed practicing Jews involved with it, sure. Also plenty of professed Catholics, Protestants, Atheists, Muslims, Buddhists, Hindus,
Satanists, Taoists, Zoroastrians, and Shintoists involved as far as I can tell. Plenty of ethnic Jews, sure. Also plenty of Europeans of all
nationalities, Asians, Africans, Australians, and Americans, who are not of Jewish descent, involved, as far as I can tell.