It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Thoughtful1
a reply to: crankyoldman
Did you see Fojack's tweet this morning?
Lady Gaga, black eyes and a child. Very graphic and disturbing. It feels like we have a tidal wave of information coming in all at once from every direction.
Fojack Tweet
PARIS — Cédric Charbit, the executive who has steered Balenciaga to rapid growth under creative director Demna Gvasalia, is the latest Kering executive to share his business acumen with an emerging designer.
Now in its 31st edition, French fashion prize ANDAM will today name Charbit as the designated mentor of this year’s winner of the main Fashion Award, and reveal that L’Oréal Paris and Google France are joining the consortium of sponsors of the prize.
originally posted by: MindBodySpiritComplex
a reply to: dashen
Since 1979, new members of the Raëlian Movement have been expected to sign an "Act of Apostasy," and send a letter of apostasy to any religious organisation that they were previously involved with. They also sign a contract permitting a mortician to cut a piece of bone from their forehead after death, which they understand as the "Third Eye." This specimen will be stored in ice at a Swiss facility until the Elohim return, at which time it may be used to clone the deceased individual.
The UFO cult made headlines when its leader, a former French sports journalist who calls himself “Rael,” appeared at a US congressional hearing on cloning. He claims that Jesus, the Buddha, and other religious figures were actually cloned by extraterrestrials and living in “UFOland.” Rael, whose real name is Claude Vorilhon, maintains that cloning will create a paradise where people will live forever.
originally posted by: SMOKINGGUN2012
#1816 - 2018-08-05 06:00:15 (UTC+1)
FISA.
FISA.
FISA.
[20]
There is a reason why we needed to go mainstream prior to the EVIDENCE being dropped.
You have more than you know.
D5.
WWG1WGA.
Q
azsos.gov...
D5=Dec 5th
Katie Hobbs is FUBAR....
originally posted by: Justoneman
I agree, we don't know what that plan actually is thanks to the Sun Tzu like nature of the situation....
How can we trust something we are only seeing bits and pieces of is a fair question?
A producer at ABC recently asked if I’d be willing to be interviewed for a documentary they’re making about Bill Clinton. I agreed.
hen I asked when they’re planning to show it.
“After he dies,” they said.
“What!? Is he dying?” I asked, shocked.
“Oh, no,” they said. “It’s for the archive.”
“You mean, it’s for whenever he dies, even if that’s twenty years from now?”
“Exactly.”
“Even if you and I are long gone by then?”
“Yup.”
I was relieved, but flummoxed. Was I supposed to talk about Clinton in the past tense? Should I give only the sort of glowing tribute accorded former presidents when they pass? Would it be inappropriate to say anything even slightly critical of him or his presidency?
I just did the interview from my office at Berkeley.
At first it all seemed weirdly morbid but after five minutes or so I forgot the weirdness and just talked.
Bobby Kennedy had been assassinated a few months before. Gene McCarthy’s presidential bid had gone nowhere. Democrats were about to nominate Lyndon Johnson’s vice president, Hubert Humphrey. Republicans were nominating the abominable Richard Nixon. Several American cities were in flames. The Vietnam War continued unabated.
My other recollection from that voyage, by the way, occurred in the ship’s stateroom, on one of my few outings from my cabin.
The stateroom was almost empty except for a pale, gray, thin man sitting at a far table, smoking a cigarette.
I sat down and introduced myself.
He told me his name was Bobby Baker.
Of all the people to be on this ship, he was the last I expected — or wanted to talk with. (If you don’t remember, Baker had been a crony of Lyndon Johnson’s. He was secretary to the Democratic Party when LBJ was Senate Majority Leader — until Robert Kennedy, as Attorney General, exposed Baker’s alleged deals with organized crime and Baker was forced to resign. Kennedy’s investigation led to allegations that Johnson himself received kickbacks from military contractors. It was rotten stuff, even worse when several newspapers found evidence that Baker had also been involved in procuring women for JFK.)
. Bill Gates
Bill Gates was nominated as an honorary guide on July 26, 2004. Founder of Microsoft, one of the world’s wealthiest men, and a worldwide philanthropist, Gates arranged in 2004 to give yet another $3 billion to charitable trusts promoting greater equality in global health and learning. In declaring him an Honorary Guide, Rael said Gates is much more of a saint than Mother Theresa was since he doesn’t spend 90 percent of his donated funds trying to convert those he helps to a religious faith other than their own as she did. Stating that education and basic health measures should be the right of all, Rael pointed out that Gates was setting an example of generosity and compassion – with no strings of religious conversion attached.
Jimmy Carter was nominated honorary guide on October 11, 2007, for his courageous stance of “putting truth before politically correct nationalism.”
Leaked Email Alleges Arizona Gov-Elect Katie Hobbs, Twitter Employees Colluded to Censor ‘Election Related Misinformation’
Lake, who has yet to concede to her opponent based on allegations of election fraud, called the email leaks a “Conflict of Interest, Coercion, Corruption
originally posted by: Guyfriday
Interesting timing on this story.
From: MSN News
A producer at ABC recently asked if I’d be willing to be interviewed for a documentary they’re making about Bill Clinton. I agreed.
hen I asked when they’re planning to show it.
“After he dies,” they said.
“What!? Is he dying?” I asked, shocked.
“Oh, no,” they said. “It’s for the archive.”
“You mean, it’s for whenever he dies, even if that’s twenty years from now?”
“Exactly.”
“Even if you and I are long gone by then?”
“Yup.”
I was relieved, but flummoxed. Was I supposed to talk about Clinton in the past tense? Should I give only the sort of glowing tribute accorded former presidents when they pass? Would it be inappropriate to say anything even slightly critical of him or his presidency?
I just did the interview from my office at Berkeley.
At first it all seemed weirdly morbid but after five minutes or so I forgot the weirdness and just talked.
So, no Bill Clinton isn't dying, well at least not that it's being reported. This isn't the interesting part of the story though. This part is:
Bobby Kennedy had been assassinated a few months before. Gene McCarthy’s presidential bid had gone nowhere. Democrats were about to nominate Lyndon Johnson’s vice president, Hubert Humphrey. Republicans were nominating the abominable Richard Nixon. Several American cities were in flames. The Vietnam War continued unabated.
My other recollection from that voyage, by the way, occurred in the ship’s stateroom, on one of my few outings from my cabin.
The stateroom was almost empty except for a pale, gray, thin man sitting at a far table, smoking a cigarette.
I sat down and introduced myself.
He told me his name was Bobby Baker.
Of all the people to be on this ship, he was the last I expected — or wanted to talk with. (If you don’t remember, Baker had been a crony of Lyndon Johnson’s. He was secretary to the Democratic Party when LBJ was Senate Majority Leader — until Robert Kennedy, as Attorney General, exposed Baker’s alleged deals with organized crime and Baker was forced to resign. Kennedy’s investigation led to allegations that Johnson himself received kickbacks from military contractors. It was rotten stuff, even worse when several newspapers found evidence that Baker had also been involved in procuring women for JFK.)
Now one thing was how he framed the time when he met Bill Clinton. "Democrats were about to nominate Lyndon Johnson’s vice president, Hubert Humphrey. Republicans were nominating the abominable Richard Nixon. Several American cities were in flames. The Vietnam War continued unabated."
Compare that to today:
DNC was pushing LBJ (who they put in the article that "Kennedy’s investigation led to allegations that Johnson himself received kickbacks from military contractors.")
And the RNC was pushing for Nixon (we have a different view on him today thanks to the media, but Nixon was a very popular individual at the time)
What concerns me is the part after those points: Cities in flame (the DNC stated this will happen if the election wasn't in their favor), and this war (Ukraine is really being pushed as a Western Countries vs Russia)
Finally, there is the weird part about Bod Baker. Is this piece a story about Bill Clinton dying while also pushing an excuse for soft disclosure of political behavior by saying "See those things have always been happening".
I didn't link any -Q-Posts to this story since there are way too many -Q-Posts that cover a lot of these talking points. That was why I am left wondering if this is a form of soft disclosure.
The DOJ, Twitter and Perkins Coie, the law firm representing Twitter for the subpoena, did not respond to the Caller when asked to verify the authenticity of the subpoena.
originally posted by: crankyoldman
How long as it been since anyone here said "Creepy Porn Lawyer?"
Obligatory.
Q Avenatti