It doesn't make any sense to kill off the obedient

originally posted by: jidnum

originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: JAGStorm

LOL No it hasn't. There may have been 6.5 million people with covid labeled on their death certificate but I can guarantee you that not all of them died because of covid.

We are nearly 4 years into this thing and NONE of the "plandemic" conspiracy's alleged goals are evident, or even likely. Nor do they even make sense. Open your eyes, the whole conspiracy theory is delusion.

Please present to me ANY proof that the majority of those that had COVID as cause of death, in fact died of something other than that - not just one or two mis-classified cases (because that will happen in any human endeavor), but millions of them, from everywhere.

Every country in the world is reporting deaths from COVID, and they don't all operate under the same governance and rules as the US, (where there is such a culture of distrust that there are popular profit earning media channels that are based solely on it - Infowars & etc). Even though you don't believe the 'official' statistics, you have no quantification of the numbers involved and no evidence for the often repeated propagandist conspiracist hyperbole.

I highly doubt that, except for a few mis-classifications, there are millions of lying false death certificates, done by millions of doctors worldwide. To suggest such is ridiculous.

originally posted by: chr0naut
Every country in the world is reporting deaths from COVID, and they don't all operate under the same governance and rules as the US

THEY ALL DID IT BECAUSE US ELECTIONS.

originally posted by: LordAhriman

originally posted by: chr0naut
Every country in the world is reporting deaths from COVID, and they don't all operate under the same governance and rules as the US

THEY ALL DID IT BECAUSE US ELECTIONS.

It is clear that they actually died of looking at paint. Yet no-one ever talks about that!

a reply to: JAGStorm

Sure it does, deaht is death they dont give it to the new version of the gestapo or the brown shirts, so when its all said and done a small percentage will be willing to resist but they will be outgunned by the bad guys.

a reply to: chr0naut

Please present to me ANY proof that the majority of those that had COVID as cause of death, in fact died of something other than that - not just one or two mis-classified cases (because that will happen in any human endeavor), but millions of them, from everywhere.

The inherent problem here is that covid tended to kill people with comorbidity such as diabetes, hypertension, heart or lung disease, or renal failure, so it was often a matter of interpretation as to whether covid killed someone or if it merely weakened them sufficiently for their comorbidity to kill them.

People can argue this one back and forth all day and get absolutely nowhere. One side will argue that the numbers were pushed in favor of covid in order to make covid seem much more dangerous than it really was, and the other side will argue the exact opposite.

The truth is that when you're looking at numbers or graphs it's more or less impossible to tell. One coroner might er on the side of covid, another might er on the side of the comorbidity, and keyboard warriors aren't going to be able to tell the difference unless there is some kind of inquest or inquiry.

From my perspective, I've seen absolutely no evidence that there is an organized effort to sway the numbers either way. If there were a conspiracy it would need to be global in scope, and would need to include so many local coroner's offices in so many countries that the sheer number of people who would need to be involved would be in the hundreds of thousands just for the US, and in the millions for the world. For the simple reason that covid statistics globally tend to be very similar, therefore in order for there to be a conspiracy it would need to include all of the places that have similar numbers, in order to make sure that those numbers were similar.

originally posted by: LordAhriman

originally posted by: chr0naut
Every country in the world is reporting deaths from COVID, and they don't all operate under the same governance and rules as the US

THEY ALL DID IT BECAUSE US ELECTIONS.

Why would countries that were allied with the US, and countries that were opposed to the US, all do the exact same thing because of the US elections?

Surely they'd have different agenda?

For example, why would China, Russia and Iran all do the same thing as countries like the UK?

"It doesn't make sense to kill of the obedient".

OP: ...Ah? Yes it does. Especially when there's profit to be made.
You're thinking like a good "Democratic" citizen. Like you actually have a say, in finding an answer to your question. Or that your (government/leaders) care about you, or your safety, as an individual.
You are just a pet, that they will have to feed. The fact that you do tricks, when you're told? .... Doesn't make you part of the family. It makes you entertainment.

If their, (the) mission, the goal, is to depopulate?... It makes perfect sense.

You are living in a "legal" Jonestown. Somebody is making bank off of you.
My advice would be? To not drink any "Kool Aid".

I don't care how much "law", "titles" or "badges" they have.
If they have to use "law", to destroy you, and get your compliance?...

It ain't for your "safety".

a reply to: JAGStorm

"It doesn't make any sense to kill off the obedient"

The only thing I can come up with to refute your statement is that cruel psychos prey on easy targets.
The most obedient are easy pray.

If you want a load of people dead,the easiest to kill with the least energy/monetary expenditure are those who you know will do exactly what you tell them to do.

a reply to: Silcone Synapse

Like this Dr. Fouchi,? Mr. "I am science", or whatever the F his name is, (sick M.Fer!)
The guy "experimented" on beagle puppies?
That's just wrong! I Don't care how "educated" you think you are, or what "title" you think you have.

That F"n P.O.S.! May as well, ate Bald Eagles!
I don't care if his brain contains all the "knowledge" of "Science".

I"d love to take him "camping". It would be good for humanity.

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: jidnum

originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: JAGStorm

LOL No it hasn't. There may have been 6.5 million people with covid labeled on their death certificate but I can guarantee you that not all of them died because of covid.

We are nearly 4 years into this thing

Can someone fact check this?

I keep reading “why kill the obedient” as a theme here.
Basic math says that the ‘masses’ are the obedient. So it makes sense that they were targeted for removal.

Also, the obedient masses will go along with the official story of why everyone is dying. So that works as well.

Also also, TPTB are actually great minds and great thinkers. Not saying that they are ‘nice’ but I am saying that they are smart and scientific.
When planning for a new humanity to emerge, the last thing this planet needs is more non-thinking sheeple.
Only the strong and the braves’ DNA is wanted for our brave new world.

Poor logic on this one. Ultimately we’re all compliant to different levels. They don’t care who they kill off as long as they reduce the population. End of the story.

a reply to: EmmanuelGoldstein

These are silent weapons for quiet wars. The circuit board is being probed and measured. The opposition is already under control. With fear of pandemic and and vaccine and pundit demagoguery cycle, the masses are programed to adjust rather quickly to emergency powers. They have robots that can perform brain implant surgery. Who else but the obedient masses will line up for the brain implants after it has been shown to make the blind to see, deaf to hear, and lame to be able, and the sick to heal.

Presumably, the humane environment-saving option available then would be to put the masses in simulation mode and placed in bio-electricity farms.

You're a farmer, you need to plough the field.

You have some weak sickly cows that will come running if you call them. Almost dog like obedient but useless for work.
If you try to plough the field with them most will just lay down and loudly moo moo moo moo in protest, the ones that try to do the job give up after 2 meters because work is hard. They think you the farmer should just feed them and plough the field yourself.
The cows are utterly useless, unable to even give milk.
They eat all the hay and give you nothing in return except their loving moos.

You also have some big strong hard to control bulls. They rarely if ever listen to you, but if you can get the yoke on and give them a few hits with the whip and bring them into line you'll have all your fields ploughed in a day. They may be difficult to control, but if you manage to do it they will get the job done.

Which ones would you use? The cows or the bulls?

If you had to cull the herd which would you cull? The weak and sick or the strong and healthy?

Weak people don't build societies. Strong people do.

The weak and sickly do not contribute to the gene pool, the strong and healthy do.

The strong contribute, the weak take.

I know if who I'd be choosing.

You break the strong, get them under control and you will thrive. The weak are already under control, but they're also already broken and not in a good way.

Seems pretty simple.

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: jidnum

originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: JAGStorm

LOL No it hasn't. There may have been 6.5 million people with covid labeled on their death certificate but I can guarantee you that not all of them died because of covid.

We are nearly 4 years into this thing

Can someone fact check this?

It started in fall 2019, it's now fall 2022. That's 3 years.

That's 75 percent of 4 years, so ... if you want to be pedantic, we're 3/4 of the way into 4 years.

a reply to: AtomicKangaroo

The problem with your analogy is that the people who are getting vaxxed are more likely to be middle class and educated or blue collar and skilled.

While the people who are least likely to get vaxxed are rurally and uneducated, or inner city and uneducated.

So, you're killing off the people who contribute most to society and the economy, while leaving behind angry rural conservatives who own most of the guns and distrust the government and inner city minorities who also distrust the government.

You're not killing off the weak cows, you're putting a bullet in the head of your blue ribbon bullocks while leaving behind a bunch of angry razorbacks and the raccoons living in your attic.

originally posted by: macaronicaesar
Poor logic on this one. Ultimately we’re all compliant to different levels. They don’t care who they kill off as long as they reduce the population. End of the story.

So why kill off the peaceful section of society living quietly in the suburbs and leave behind angry rural conservatives with a bunch of guns.

Surely if you wanted to kill of part of society, you'd simply hand out free fentanyl in the homeless camps and ghettos and watch all of the least productive members of society kill themselves.

Equally, if you wanted to reduce society, why not just encourage people to use condoms more. At least 25 percent of all pregnancies in the US are unplanned. You could reduce the population simply by encouraging safe sex and making abortions cheaper, and you wouldn't actually need to directly kill anybody.

How about reducing immigration?

You could reduce the population simply by letting fewer people into the country.

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: loam

originally posted by: chr0naut

Those who oppose any reasonable defense against the disease, are making the problem worse.

You mean all of those therapeutics they banned even mention of by any physician under the guise those physicians would cause hesitancy to the pharmaceutical companies' poorly tested and no liability vaccines?

I agree.

If by therapeutics, you mean HQC and Ivermectin, they didn't and don't work.

Remember Brazil and India actually distributed them to the public. Now, neither country even approves them or distributes them, because they didn't work.

Ivermectin worked for 3 friends, my parents and I as well as 2 others I know. That's a 100% efficacy rate. The fact that they banned it and HCQ tells me how utterly malignant governments are and you can go on believing in the trustworthiness of them but do not preach their virtues to the rest of us.

To all those who think the least educated are the most vaccine hesitant, think again!
Americans with PhDs are the most reluctant to get vaccinated
www.dailymail.co.uk...

originally posted by: AaarghZombies
Why would countries that were allied with the US, and countries that were opposed to the US, all do the exact same thing because of the US elections?

Surely they'd have different agenda?

For example, why would China, Russia and Iran all do the same thing as countries like the UK?

I was kidding. They wouldn't.