It doesn't make any sense to kill off the obedient

a reply to: JAGStorm
As it gets more evident the vaxxers are dying the media will blame the anti-vaxxers. The vaxxers will turn on the anti-vaxxers and kil them before they die off. So everyone dies.

originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: JAGStorm

Covid has killed 6.5 million in a three year period.

It is becoming endemic. Mutating to new forms more than seasonally.

Those who oppose any reasonable defense against the disease, are making the problem worse.

So then all the authorities are making it worse by all the actions they have taken, many of those actions being illegal.

a reply to: TzarChasm
What makes you think "they havent served their purpose"?

originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed

originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: JAGStorm

Covid has killed 6.5 million in a three year period.

It is becoming endemic. Mutating to new forms more than seasonally.

Those who oppose any reasonable defense against the disease, are making the problem worse.

So then all the authorities are making it worse by all the actions they have taken, many of those actions being illegal.

No, you have that backwards. It is the ones who want to do nothing (when there are effective things we can do) who are making the problem worse.

And by definition, the actions taken by the legal authorities are not illegal unless they directly contradict some definite statutory law.

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed

originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: JAGStorm

Covid has killed 6.5 million in a three year period.

It is becoming endemic. Mutating to new forms more than seasonally.

Those who oppose any reasonable defense against the disease, are making the problem worse.

So then all the authorities are making it worse by all the actions they have taken, many of those actions being illegal.

No, you have that backwards. It is the ones who want to do nothing (when there are effective things we can do) who are making the problem worse.

And by definition, the actions taken by the legal authorities are not illegal unless they directly contradict some definite statutory law.

Democide is pretty high up in "illegal".

a reply to: JAGStorm

Your answer comes with a simply question: who says it has to make sense when it makes money?

How billionaires saw their net worth increase by half a trillion dollars during the pandemic

originally posted by: ChristianSupremacist

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed

originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: JAGStorm

Covid has killed 6.5 million in a three year period.

It is becoming endemic. Mutating to new forms more than seasonally.

Those who oppose any reasonable defense against the disease, are making the problem worse.

So then all the authorities are making it worse by all the actions they have taken, many of those actions being illegal.

No, you have that backwards. It is the ones who want to do nothing (when there are effective things we can do) who are making the problem worse.

And by definition, the actions taken by the legal authorities are not illegal unless they directly contradict some definite statutory law.

Democide is pretty high up in "illegal".

It is illegal because it is against definite statutory laws.

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: JAGStorm

You won't get an answer. I have been pointing this out for a while.

Its easy really and since you havent gotten the answer ill give it to you.

They dont want or need people who are obedient sheep.

Think about the future that is coming. Why deal with the sheep when you can automate the sheep. You only want intelligent people who can think for themselves when you start colonizing a universe.

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: ChristianSupremacist

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed

originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: JAGStorm

Covid has killed 6.5 million in a three year period.

It is becoming endemic. Mutating to new forms more than seasonally.

Those who oppose any reasonable defense against the disease, are making the problem worse.

So then all the authorities are making it worse by all the actions they have taken, many of those actions being illegal.

No, you have that backwards. It is the ones who want to do nothing (when there are effective things we can do) who are making the problem worse.

And by definition, the actions taken by the legal authorities are not illegal unless they directly contradict some definite statutory law.

Democide is pretty high up in "illegal".

It is illegal because it is against definite statutory laws.

and they're doing it right now

a reply to: Another_Nut

"Colonising a universe"? When do we start doing that?

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: Another_Nut

"Colonising a universe"? When do we start doing that?

It will begin in the next 50-100 years. Maybe sooner.

a reply to: JAGStorm

It doesn't make any sense to kill off the obedient

Hi Jag,

I ran across this viewpoint back in 2016. Some quotes from it:

It's not "Goodbye to the West" but "Goodbye to the Modern Era" as Elitist politicians (like those who write for Project Syndicate) pursue their relentless campaign for the "refeudalisation" of society.

It's easy to forget that the Modern Era with its Modern Era values of egalitarianism, democratisation and national self-determination is . . . well . . . MODERN. It hasn’t been around for very long.

It is easy to forget that when viewed with proper perspective, human history up until the time of the Modern Era was a story of aggressively narcissistic, machiavellian psychopaths competing (sometimes collaborating) to attain positions of power, then using that power to dominate and brutalise their fellow human beings. We know from the historical record that these rulers showed no remorse in wasting the lives of thousands - even millions - of people they regarded as “their” Subjects.

Human psychology has not evolved. Evolution operates over a much longer time frame. The psychopaths (and their sycophant supporters) have not gone away.

All that happened in the Modern Era was a temporary change in the environment: the demands of the industrial economy meant that it was expedient – for a time – for the rulers to make limited concessions to their Subjects.

What we are witnessing now is an elite response to the post-industrial world of AI and robotics.

No longer are large numbers of Subjects required to run complex but not fully automated machinery. Now it is small numbers of very highly trained technicians required to manage the robotic workforce. Small in number, they can easily be bought off. Better still, they can effectively be reduced to the status of indentured workers through the weapon of crippling student debt. They dare not rebel for fear of their debts being called in.

As for the rest of humanity, they are now redundant or soon will be. Their rulers no longer need them. And those the earlier concessions are - as the saying goes - “inoperative”.

Elective government provides no safeguards. It will prove no barrier to containing the psychopaths once the cost of pacification falls as a result of robotics.

You don’t need to be Einstein to see how this game must play itself out.

For most people it’s not going to be a happy ending.

There is more in that "rant" and it is a grim take. Yet, knowing the history I do, I find many of the points in the text cogent.

The brutal truth may be that most of us are not considered essential, even those who are 'obedient' to the elites.

Cheers

originally posted by: Another_Nut

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: JAGStorm

You won't get an answer. I have been pointing this out for a while.

Its easy really and since you havent gotten the answer ill give it to you.

They dont want or need people who are obedient sheep.

Think about the future that is coming. Why deal with the sheep when you can automate the sheep. You only want intelligent people who can think for themselves when you start colonizing a universe.

I think you haven't thought it through. They don't want intelligent people because sooner or later those intelligent people are gonna realise "hang on a minute, how come they've got all the luxury and we haven't", "we want a bit of that" and that ladies and gentlemen is where the trouble starts.

Every civilization since the world formed has tried the same scenario. Rich, controlling elites (whether they call themselves gods, kings or priests) by keeping the populace in subjection to control them. Control, whether it's food, shelter, fear or some other method. But in the end they all fail.

Why? Because over time some of the elite will want to be more elite than their friends. In fighting.

originally posted by: Insurrectile
a reply to: JAGStorm

Your answer comes with a simply question: who says it has to make sense when it makes money?

How billionaires saw their net worth increase by half a trillion dollars during the pandemic

Big Pharma might be making money on the vax, but it's losing money on its other products like cosmetics because people aren't going out dolled up nearly so much as they used to due to the pandemic.

Big Pharma owns so many different products, and they gain on the vax don't offset the loses elsewhere.

a reply to: Another_Nut

Why deal with the sheep when you can automate the sheep.

Because they need the sheep in order to maintain their positions.

You can't automate consumerism.

You can't be a real estate baron if there are no people to rent your apartments.

You can't be a movie start if there are no audiences.

You can't run an online shopping empire if there isn't anybody to buy what you're selling.

The 1 percent depend on the 99 percent to remain part of the 1 percent. Killing them makes no sense. Can you imagine these people once their empire collapse through lack of population to maintain them?

a reply to: JAGStorm

@Jag

Heh, I went looking on the internet for that rant (it used be on several sites) and wonder of wonders ... it is not in the search results.

Hmm.

Cheers

In this world it is necessary for individuals to agree to your demise. In the Bible you have to agree to the mark. Granted the results of not agreeing is death but your soul is free.

Always remember your soul is more important than your life and if they were right and good they would’ve lied or deceived.

There are rules but you have to know them.

originally posted by: AaarghZombies

originally posted by: Insurrectile
a reply to: JAGStorm

Your answer comes with a simply question: who says it has to make sense when it makes money?

How billionaires saw their net worth increase by half a trillion dollars during the pandemic

Big Pharma might be making money on the vax, but it's losing money on its other products like cosmetics because people aren't going out dolled up nearly so much as they used to due to the pandemic.

Big Pharma owns so many different products, and they gain on the vax don't offset the loses elsewhere.

I'm talking about the filthy rich getting richer, not about a single venue like patent-rights. And the political actionism with corona restrictions saw poor people suffer from this pandemic the most, except for... I dunno... places like South Korea or China?

The "Evil Communists" vaccinated half of the world (the poorer parts we gave up a long while ago) while our filthy rich investors still reek in the profits of a neo-colonial depopulation agenda. That's Sinopharm right there. Different kind of Big Pharma Silk Road, innit?

a reply to: crayzeed

And i dont think you have thought it through and don't understand the future that is coming.

You are stuck in the last century.

a reply to: AaarghZombies

This post just shows how outdated your thinking is.

You think the object of their desire is money. Its not.

Are the unvaccinated the chosen ones? The X-files had this one , and regarding the whole story and what has happened last few years, makes go really hmmmmmm


A Warning for the Vaccinated from Twenty Odd Years Ago