It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Kenzo
a reply to: chr0naut
Conclusion
Ivermectin is an effective treatment for COVID-19. Treatment is more effective when used early. Meta analysis using the most serious outcome shows 62% [51‑70%] and 83% [74‑89%] improvement for early treatment and prophylaxis, with similar results after exclusion based sensitivity analysis, for primary outcomes, for peer-reviewed studies, and for RCTs. Statistically significant improvements are seen for mortality, ventilation, ICU admission, hospitalization, recovery, cases, and viral clearance. All remain significant after exclusions. 58 studies from 52 independent teams in 22 different countries show statistically significant improvements in isolation (40 for primary outcomes, and 38 for the most serious outcome). Results are very robust — in worst case exclusion sensitivity analysis 59 of 93 studies must be excluded to avoid finding statistically significant efficacy.
Ivermectin for COVID-19: real-time meta analysis of 93 studies
Brazil and india has huge toxity problem, making people sick .
originally posted by: anonentity
a reply to: Blaine91555
That is what you are supposed to think. Even as the average death rates are going up when logic suggests they should now be going down. It is totally inconceivable that a democratically elected government would engage in a depopulation program.
originally posted by: mblahnikluver
originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: JAGStorm
Covid has killed 6.5 million in a three year period.
It is becoming endemic. Mutating to new forms more than seasonally.
Those who oppose any reasonable defense against the disease, are making the problem worse.
10 million a year die from various forms of cancer....where is your concern for those numbers?
I do not believe any numbers for covid, they are lies.
Our local hospital got caught lying on numbers mid plandemic!
It was laughable! I know a few people who died during covid, one was end stage kidney failure (forced to get the vaccine) and died but they said covid killed him. Uh no the cancer killed him
and the , their frankenshot just made his death sooner!
He was also in his 80s. There WAS a FB group of people who had family or friends die of something NON covid related but it was labeled covid on their DC. Nurses were commenting anonymously the same thing.
So yea I do not believe their numbers. They are there to 'scare' the ones who can't think for themselves. If something is truly and I mean TRULY pandemic the world would still be shut down.....oh wait I live in a state that didn't shut down, our governor gave the middle finger on that and vaccine requirements.
I will NEVER get any vaccine.
If you have to bribe and threaten people to get a vaccine that is NOT OK! I have friends who got the shot and NOW they wish they didn't because they have all been sick in one way or another AND they all got covid multiple times...but hey some were threatened with their jobs to get the shot and others were given a bonus to get the shot. There isn't anything in this world that could convince me to take that shot. Nope, no amount of money in the world.
originally posted by: anonentity
a reply to: chr0naut
Because of the safe effective vaccine?
originally posted by: andr3w68
a reply to: chr0naut
No, people who refuse to take the vax and wear masks are not making the problem worse.
Viruses mutate and spread each year, many different kinds of them. Generally, like COVID 19(SARS COV II), this means that they actually do LESS harm to the host but become more virulent instead.
So, once again, tell me how not wearing a mask which doesn't contain the exhaled virus in the first place, and not taking a vaccine that doesn't stop you from spreading the virus makes anything worse, other than your personal health that is.
originally posted by: pureblood69
a reply to: Blaine91555
Because its not a vaccine.
And I dont believe for one second it has saved anybody.
They lied about efficacy, they said you would not catch it or spread it, why do you believe they are telling the truth about less symptoms?
They have done nothing but lie
originally posted by: v1rtu0s0
originally posted by: JAGStorm
I've been pondering this for a while.
We've often discussed tptb (or some evil powers) that there is a scheme to kill off people. A central theme is that they will do it with the vaccinations.
It is widly accepted that this is being pushed by the left, the liberal and the liberal media.
On the opposite side, it is mostly conservatives that are against the vaccines.
So if the media and the left are so pro vaccines, would they push it on the people that would support them the most?
That dosen't make any sense. If anything they would want the people against it to perish.
Remember, those in charge have a much deeper understanding of human nature. Just like how Insurance agencies can predict death pretty accurately, those in charge -know- human behavior. They know who will vaccinate and who won't.
So this leads me to believe one of two things.
-Covid is much much worse than any of us can imagine, mild now but maybe much worse later on. Vaccines actually do help, if even a little. This would explain the unbelieveable measures China is taking.
or
-The vaccines are much worse than any of us can image and it will take out the obedient while the skeptics, and survivalist will prevail.
In a way... Eugenics...
or C..
Both the vaccines and covid is much worse than we can imagine and they are only delaying the inevitable and trying to kill off as many of us as possible. Oddly if this is the case, this would also explain the whole Abortion debate. Get as many people to argue about it and bring it to light, and more people will want to do it and accept it. Just like the war on drugs made drug use so much worse.
hmmmm.
It's a bigger picture than immediate deaths from the vaccines. Some are saying there will be wars, famines and economic collapse as well.
But beyond the immediate deaths, they aren't supposed to "kick in" for 4 or 5 years. And beyond that, depending on the concoction people receive their children might be sterile. Affecting birth rates long term has much more of an impact that the initial 20% sustained increase in all cause mortality.
originally posted by: fencesitter85
The depopulation agenda has never made any sense. Ever.
Population = profit.
Lower population = less profit.
It's beyond ridiculous to think the 1% would want to kill off all the people they can make money from e.g. through pharmaceutical addiction.
And as you note, why would they take out the compliant people, leaving all the supposed free thinkers and rebels?
It's one of the more ridiculous conspiracy theories peddled by the nut jobs.
these reasons can not account for the vastly increased levels of excess mortality being reported in previously young healthy people.
. In a cataclysmic scenario, they're the sort of people you want around you, not blindly obedient imbeciles.
Most of the people I know who resisted mandates are skilled professionals and/or independently wealthy.
originally posted by: jidnum
originally posted by: fencesitter85
The depopulation agenda has never made any sense. Ever.
Population = profit.
Lower population = less profit.
It's beyond ridiculous to think the 1% would want to kill off all the people they can make money from e.g. through pharmaceutical addiction.
And as you note, why would they take out the compliant people, leaving all the supposed free thinkers and rebels?
It's one of the more ridiculous conspiracy theories peddled by the nut jobs.
It's not about profit, it's about maintaining power and control. The less people there is, the easier it is to maintain that control. Profit is completely irrelevant.