It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: chris_stibrany
There is already a long list of international politicians and famous elite that have been proven to have not taken the injection, or to have faked taking it.
originally posted by: JAGStorm
...
With the Covid vaccine EVERY single person, and I mean every single person I know that got it has had Covid.
Weird right.
originally posted by: XxGargamelxX
The compliant and unquestioning will always be the 1st to slaughter or sacrifice.
originally posted by: ARM1968
The vaccines are hopefully just very badly done and a money making exercise. If not then they are very sinister indeed. My opinion is that we will see a collapse in western birth rates very soon. Those dying now are just a fortunate sideshow for these sick freaks running the scheme. Seems, if you dig in, few of the top politicians or elites have had the vaccine. Again, we must wonder why?
originally posted by: Notabot12345666
THEY’RE KILLING OFF ALL THE STUPID PEOPLE.
originally posted by: HUBE007
By that same measure, those of you who think you are doing something about it are actually causing the disease to mutate and create ways around these stupid vaccines. Variants anyone?
originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: JAGStorm
Covid has killed 6.5 million in a three year period.
It is becoming endemic. Mutating to new forms more than seasonally.
Those who oppose any reasonable defense against the disease, are making the problem worse.
originally posted by: chris_stibrany
Did 'covid' kill those people just because the 'Governments' and Corporations moving in lockstep said so? Surely they are not to be questioned on their manipulated use of terminology and statistics?
a reply to: chr0naut
Because the magic doesn’t work if you don’t shove it I our face first.
originally posted by: CriticalStinker
originally posted by: joemoe
If the Georgia Guidestones gives any clue, then "C" they just want to reduce the population of the world and they don't care how or who.
Why would they make their plans public for everyone to see? Why not just keep it on the down low?
originally posted by: loam
originally posted by: chr0naut
Those who oppose any reasonable defense against the disease, are making the problem worse.
You mean all of those therapeutics they banned even mention of by any physician under the guise those physicians would cause hesitancy to the pharmaceutical companies' poorly tested and no liability vaccines?
I agree.
originally posted by: slatesteam
Because the magic doesn’t work if you don’t shove it I our face first.
originally posted by: CriticalStinker
originally posted by: joemoe
If the Georgia Guidestones gives any clue, then "C" they just want to reduce the population of the world and they don't care how or who.
Why would they make their plans public for everyone to see? Why not just keep it on the down low?
Predictive programming and all.
originally posted by: LordAhriman
originally posted by: Notabot12345666
THEY’RE KILLING OFF ALL THE STUPID PEOPLE.
LOOOOOOLLLLL!
Did you actually type that with a straight face?
Conclusion
Ivermectin is an effective treatment for COVID-19. Treatment is more effective when used early. Meta analysis using the most serious outcome shows 62% [51‑70%] and 83% [74‑89%] improvement for early treatment and prophylaxis, with similar results after exclusion based sensitivity analysis, for primary outcomes, for peer-reviewed studies, and for RCTs. Statistically significant improvements are seen for mortality, ventilation, ICU admission, hospitalization, recovery, cases, and viral clearance. All remain significant after exclusions. 58 studies from 52 independent teams in 22 different countries show statistically significant improvements in isolation (40 for primary outcomes, and 38 for the most serious outcome). Results are very robust — in worst case exclusion sensitivity analysis 59 of 93 studies must be excluded to avoid finding statistically significant efficacy.