It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Why did people all wear a mask, really???
originally posted by: Kurokage
a reply to: Asmodeus3
It was authorised for emergency use by MHRA and initially given to the most at Vulnerable.
originally posted by: thethinkingman
Well if people all follow the same rules more or less, they're quite predictable. If 99+% of people have no clue about most things, they only predictably behave in a certain number of ways.
Its a top down thing, people do as they're told. Thats why you followed "rules". Then when you follow them....it makes to seem like everyone "wanted" to do that. Did you ask all of them??? clearly the vast majority just didnt wanna rock the boat and just breeze through with no issues.
The doctors have people above them. Scientists have people above them. If you have the entire media practically mind programming everyone to think you're a bastard if you do anything otherwise, its quite easy to "cancel" people for whatever you want. Its quite easy to threaten peoples likelihoods and they'll shut up. It happens every single day in peoples work and they just put up with whatever cause they need the job.
You know how you refer to other people all the time????? You and thousands of others are infact peddling a few peoples ideas......... Its not that hard to get people to do it, you literally watch it happen.
Why did people all wear a mask, really??? cause they #ing got told to and threatened if they didnt and didnt wanna be the odd one out. Hence why nobody is wearing them now and instantly stopped as soon as they were "allowed".
Its completely pathetic. Spineless morons. Gullible fools. And the problem is people hate being fooled, they dont like feeling stupid....and if so many of them are, they'll just ignore it, they'll just pretend it didnt happen that way. Duhhhhhhh. But keep being in denial.
Billions of people took an injection they literally didnt even know what it did, for most of them their thoughts were "vaccine good, science good, vaccine save people, death bad". ive talked to # loads of people about it, less than 1% even know the basics about any vaccine nevermind this one, or anything else. You can lead people anywhere you want with all this bull# and they have no idea its bull# until someone in "authority" says so.
99% of people took the vaccine literally based on faith, not on their knowledge. They had no clue and STILL dont.
originally posted by: Asmodeus3
originally posted by: ScepticScot
a reply to: Asmodeus3
The vaccines weren't even available when that was written.
No decision had been made.
If you know about the process of establishing vaccine safety you would know it takes years.
It's precisely because we knew nothing about them they couldn't be rolled out in the young and healthy populations. One can argue they shouldnt have been rolled out at all.
If you know about the process of establishing vaccine safety you would know it takes years.
It's precisely because we knew nothing about them they couldn't be rolled out in the young and healthy populations. One can argue they shouldnt have been rolled out at all.
originally posted by: Asmodeus3
originally posted by: Kurokage
a reply to: Asmodeus3
It was authorised for emergency use by MHRA and initially given to the most at Vulnerable.
Yes I know. But semergency authorisations are very different from establishing vaccine safety. That's why you shouldn't give them to young and healthy populations, as to avoid the harm.
And as per Dr Malhotra's paper
"In the non-elderly population the “number needed to treat” to prevent a single death runs into the thousands. Re-analysis of randomised controlled trials using the messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) technology suggests a greater risk of serious adverse events from the vaccines than being hospitalised from COVID-19"
originally posted by: ScepticScot
originally posted by: Asmodeus3
originally posted by: ScepticScot
a reply to: Asmodeus3
The vaccines weren't even available when that was written.
No decision had been made.
If you know about the process of establishing vaccine safety you would know it takes years.
It's precisely because we knew nothing about them they couldn't be rolled out in the young and healthy populations. One can argue they shouldnt have been rolled out at all.
And of course there was no special circumstances in 2020...
originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: Deplorable
We are not being killed "en masse".
It's not like 28 Days Later here, ya know?
originally posted by: Kurokage
a reply to: Asmodeus3
If you know about the process of establishing vaccine safety you would know it takes years.
It's precisely because we knew nothing about them they couldn't be rolled out in the young and healthy populations. One can argue they shouldnt have been rolled out at all.
Thats just your assumption.
It was authorised for emergency use by MHRA and initially given to the most at risk. But by your argument, we gave the jab to the people who'd be killed the easiest by a faulty drug? I don't remeber hundreds of thousands of the elderly and sick dropping dead from the jab?
If the jab was thought to be dangerous and was a risk, then you'd give it to the people able to fight off any ill effects, the young and more healthy.