It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Asmodeus3
originally posted by: ScepticScot
a reply to: Asmodeus3
Here it is again as well.
The JCVI said there had not been a decision on who would be eligible for the vaccine.
The health department said it was looking at advice from the JCVI, adding that it wanted “as many people as possible to access a Covid-19 vaccine”.
Ms Bingham, who is also managing partner at fund manager SV Health Investors, said that if any vaccine proved to be 95 per cent effective, which is thought to be unlikely, then it may make sense to vaccinate more widely but any decision on this would be taken later
See post above and the opening post.
Unless you are in a denial.
I will repeat again that the vaccine task force wasn't advised by pedestrians but by scientists
1.older adults’ resident in a care home and care home workers
2.all those 80 years of age and over and health and social care workers
3.all those 75 years of age and over
4.all those 70 years of age and over
5.all those 65 years of age and over
6.high-risk adults under 65 years of age
7.moderate-risk adults under 65 years of age
8.all those 60 years of age and over
9.all those 55 years of age and over
10.all those 50 years of age and over
11.rest of the population (priority to be determined)
originally posted by: ScepticScot
a reply to: Asmodeus3
Your own link says different.
originally posted by: Kurokage
a reply to: Asmodeus3
I will repeat again that the vaccine task force wasn't advised by pedestrians but by scientists
Yes, scientists that worked for the Department of Health. Which is were the quote I posted comes from, that was linked to in the FT article at the time.
1.older adults’ resident in a care home and care home workers
2.all those 80 years of age and over and health and social care workers
3.all those 75 years of age and over
4.all those 70 years of age and over
5.all those 65 years of age and over
6.high-risk adults under 65 years of age
7.moderate-risk adults under 65 years of age
8.all those 60 years of age and over
9.all those 55 years of age and over
10.all those 50 years of age and over
11.rest of the population (priority to be determined)
originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: Asmodeus3
Your article is from October 2020.
Before the first COVID jab was even give in the UK:
www.england.nhs.uk...
originally posted by: thethinkingman
hmmmm yes, billions of pounds exchanged hands for the vaccine before they were created or known if they'd be safe at all, advertised as the our only hope the entire time. Went from for the vulnerable then turned into being everyone but pretended it was your "choice". They immediately came up with this vaccine response, fully across the entire globe practically. ........
They were ALWAYS going to roll it out, they'd hardly spend billions and then go ah nah, it doesnt work, its unsafe and errr it cost insane amounts of money. they're hardly going to turn around and say that now either. Even with all the evidence in the world, which we literally have.
The response to events like this was changed. The government even did "pandemic training excercises" about 4 years before covid and the results were they were completely unprepared if something terrible happened on a scale far beyond covid, what did they do??? absolutely nothing.
Theres literally no excuses. There is only excuses because its damn well obvious is was completely over exaggerated then they just rolled with it and see how far it would go. They spent around 15 billion pound of a spying app. They paid people to stay at home and go along with the bull#, not that they had a choice cause businesses were lawfully shut down.
They allowed privileged businesses to open only, they made completely ridiculous illogical non sense rules that were only designed to see who is compliant. All of this made people believe something bad was going on cause they can't believe the government would do all that for something that is not killing barely anyone. 0.1% of the uk population in 2020. They lied about how bad it would be. They lied about how effective their lockdowns were. They lied about masks. They lied about how the vaccine works and its effectiveness. They lied about scientists opposing their lies. They lied about having parties whilst everyone was following dumb ass rules. They spent insane amounts of money that will put EVERYONE into debt for decades. Someone pocketed all that money. And you're going to pay.
You think these lies are all mistakes, you're obviously either completely bone headed or you're a liar yourself.
originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: Asmodeus3
Your article is from October 2020.
Before the first COVID jab was even give in the UK:
www.england.nhs.uk...
originally posted by: Kurokage
a reply to: Asmodeus3
As both ScepticScot and OldCarpy2 have pointed out the vaccination program hadn't begun yet, but as I've shown, the Health of England site was already posting a list for the expected rollout with the most vulnerable and careworkers first.
originally posted by: ScepticScot
a reply to: Asmodeus3
The vaccines weren't even available when that was written.
No decision had been made.