Abortions - Why so bad?

a reply to: Sookiechacha

So link to a pro abortion website and a doctor who makes a career from abortion proves my photo is artwork.

Okey dokey, think I’ll let the crazies go back to doing their thing.

myanetwork.org...

Early abortion is safe and common.¹ We offer you private and personalized options for ending your pregnancy.
We are a network of clinicians² who are expanding early abortion options in primary care settings.

Unbiased eh?

a reply to: Annee

I never said it wasn’t enhanced, it’s still a photo, not a painting.

It’s still clearly a human baby, just like the other photos your friend posted.

originally posted by: Grenade
a reply to: Annee

I never said it wasn’t enhanced, it’s still a photo, not a painting.

It’s still clearly a human baby, just like the other photos your friend posted.

You can stay in your lane -- I'll stay in mine.

All women have the right of autonomy of their body. It is no one else's business.

I stand by the choice I made. I have no regrets. I would do it again under same circumstances.

originally posted by: loam

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: loam

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Annee
IMO -- this is 'murder': Every year, 3.1 million children die (8500 children per day) due to poor nutrition.

The world does not need one more child that cannot be cared for. That is unwanted.

MONEY THAT COULD HAVE GONE TO THESE LIVING CHILDREN

1. Anti-Abortion PACs Spent $1.1 Million In Just Four Weeks Backing Herschel Walker www.forbes.com...

2. The anti-abortion rights sector spent $300,000 on federal lobbying www.opensecrets.org...

JUST 2 EXAMPLES.

I agree, some people's principles are hypocritical.

YES! Definitely

If you want to force "your nose" into other people's reproduction -- how about doing it to take care of the kids that are already LIVING.

It rings of self-righteousness - selfishness for their own reasons

YES.

There is not one unselfish reason to procreate.

Wanted or Not.

Says the person where procreation is a biological universal for all living creatures on the planet.

And ? ? ?

According to the UN Environment Programme, the Earth is in the midst of a mass extinction of life. Scientists estimate that 150-200 species of plant, insect, bird and mammal become extinct every 24 hours.

Humans are not in danger of becoming extinct any time soon.

They do however contribute significantly to habitat loss -- which is a main reason for extinction of other lifeforms.

Not sure what point you're trying to make and how it relates to abortion, but I imagine what you're trying to say is that it's okay to murder our children because human beings aren't at risk of becoming extinct anytime soon?.

Can't imagine what taking care of the LIVING has to do with not bringing more unwanted into the world (s/)

There is not one unselfish reason for humans to procreate.

a reply to: Annee

Like I said, death cult thinking.

originally posted by: loam
a reply to: Annee

Like I said, death cult thinking.

Again - interesting interpretation from your mind.

I continue to support the LIVING -- taking care of those children already LIVING and in great need.

But your mind sees a death cult.

a reply to: Annee

That your attempt to shut me down?

Good luck with that. If you can’t address any of the points I raise then don’t reply at all.

originally posted by: Grenade
a reply to: Annee

That your attempt to shut me down?

Good luck with that. If you can’t address any of the points I raise then don’t reply at all.

Really? Like anything's changed in 52 pages. Cynical much?

All your points have been addressed in this thread by one poster or another.

What you really want is for me to agree with you.

originally posted by: loam
a reply to: Annee

Like I said, death cult thinking.

Apparently in your mind.

a reply to: Grenade

Unbiased eh?

At least the photos presented weren't doctored to make them look more undeveloped than they actually are, like your anti-abortion artists do, trying to make a 10 week embryo look exactly like a pink newborn, just tinier.

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: Grenade

Unbiased eh?

At least the photos presented weren't doctored to make them look more undeveloped than they actually are, like your anti-abortion artists do, trying to make a 10 week embryo look exactly like a pink newborn, just tinier.

Right.

Not that it changes my view on women's autonomy and Right to Choose. I 100% always support woman's Right of Choice.

But when I miscarried -- I did have the sense of mind to retrieve the "fetus" from the toilet.

It looked like a pink bean. There was no definement in legs and arms like these pictures show.

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: loam
a reply to: Annee

Like I said, death cult thinking.

Again - interesting interpretation from your mind.

I continue to support the LIVING -- taking care of those children already LIVING and in great need.

But your mind sees a death cult.

Let's compare...

I support the LIVING, including the unborn.

You support the LIVING, but support the killing of the unborn.

Yes, I know...clump of cells all the way to 9 months from your view.

Which brings us back to full circle...convenient thinking.

originally posted by: loam

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: loam
a reply to: Annee

Like I said, death cult thinking.

Again - interesting interpretation from your mind.

I continue to support the LIVING -- taking care of those children already LIVING and in great need.

But your mind sees a death cult.

Let's compare...

I support the LIVING, including the unborn.

You support the LIVING, but support the killing of the unborn.

Yes, I know...clump of cells all the way to 9 months from your view.

Which brings us back to full circle...convenient thinking.

I'll be sure to tell those 3+ million starving LIVING children -- they're just a convenient thought.

ffl.org...

a reply to: Annee

Concentrate on your own offspring, if you can’t even support your own pregnancies then best not comment on others who’ve had children despite hardships you could only imagine.

Virtue signalling BS

a reply to: Sookiechacha

That photographer is anti abortion? News to me.

How is the image edited in your opinion? Before you answer you should understand I’m very experienced with photo and video editing.

a reply to: Annee

Nah you’re too far down the rabbit hole to accept basic biology.

a reply to: Grenade

How about you ask your 5 year old nephew what these non-enhanced pictures look like.

10 weeks


11 weeks

www.gettyimages.com...

Or these, colored but not enhanced to make it look more like a newborn..

10 weeks


or this one at 6 weeks


Do you see the difference now?

originally posted by: Grenade
a reply to: Annee

Concentrate on your own offspring, if you can’t even support your own pregnancies then best not comment on others who’ve had children despite hardships you could only imagine.

Virtue signalling BS

I did. I had the abortion so I could afford the 2 LIVING CHILDREN I already had -- while in the process of divorce (ex-husband-to-be was sperm donor).

Single mother of 2 apparently doesn't rate as a hard ship to you. Gotta pump out another one to qualify.

No thanks.

originally posted by: Grenade
a reply to: Annee

Nah you’re too far down the rabbit hole to accept basic biology.

Potential to be -- is Potential to be.

Does not qualify beyond that.

a reply to: Sookiechacha

Human babies.

What species are you suggesting those beings belong to?

Is there a foetus species I’m not aware of?

Again, denial of basic biology.