It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: WanderingMrM
I dont think the west underestimated russia. Seems like they gave just enough estimation as the money faucet is still open, the corruption still obvious and now the US gets to sell more LNG to Europe.
While in the same week OPEC gives us the finger.
If this isnt planned, its one epic series of coincidences
originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: WanderingMrM
I dont think the west underestimated russia. Seems like they gave just enough estimation as the money faucet is still open, the corruption still obvious and now the US gets to sell more LNG to Europe.
While in the same week OPEC gives us the finger.
If this isnt planned, its one epic series of coincidences
originally posted by: MidnightWatcher
originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: WanderingMrM
I dont think the west underestimated russia. Seems like they gave just enough estimation as the money faucet is still open, the corruption still obvious and now the US gets to sell more LNG to Europe.
While in the same week OPEC gives us the finger.
If this isnt planned, its one epic series of coincidences
Does the US have the infrastructure to export any more LNG to Europe?
Then why keep repeating the lie?
originally posted by: Dolby_X
a reply to: WanderingMrM
Nah the french confirm nothing for now it's just a news source in french
originally posted by: JinMI
originally posted by: MidnightWatcher
originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: WanderingMrM
I dont think the west underestimated russia. Seems like they gave just enough estimation as the money faucet is still open, the corruption still obvious and now the US gets to sell more LNG to Europe.
While in the same week OPEC gives us the finger.
If this isnt planned, its one epic series of coincidences
Does the US have the infrastructure to export any more LNG to Europe?
Then why keep repeating the lie?
Socks dont get to lecture about dishonesty. Youre the pinnacle of bad faith.
Has the US shipped more or less LNG to Europe?
More, definately more.
originally posted by: MidnightWatcher
originally posted by: JinMI
originally posted by: MidnightWatcher
originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: WanderingMrM
I dont think the west underestimated russia. Seems like they gave just enough estimation as the money faucet is still open, the corruption still obvious and now the US gets to sell more LNG to Europe.
While in the same week OPEC gives us the finger.
If this isnt planned, its one epic series of coincidences
Does the US have the infrastructure to export any more LNG to Europe?
Then why keep repeating the lie?
Socks dont get to lecture about dishonesty. Youre the pinnacle of bad faith.
Has the US shipped more or less LNG to Europe?
More, definately more.
More than we are now obviously, our LNG facilities are at 100% capacity, and the revenue from that isn't at all on a significant scale to our oil & gas industry.
There just isn't anything to gain.
originally posted by: JinMI
originally posted by: MidnightWatcher
originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: WanderingMrM
I dont think the west underestimated russia. Seems like they gave just enough estimation as the money faucet is still open, the corruption still obvious and now the US gets to sell more LNG to Europe.
While in the same week OPEC gives us the finger.
If this isnt planned, its one epic series of coincidences
Does the US have the infrastructure to export any more LNG to Europe?
Then why keep repeating the lie?
Socks dont get to lecture about dishonesty. Youre the pinnacle of bad faith.
Has the US shipped more or less LNG to Europe?
More, definately more.
originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: WanderingMrM
Ahem....
...and this...
originally posted by: MidnightWatcher
a reply to: JinMI
Number 1 ATS Word Twister
I bow in awe and respect of your twistiness.
From ISW:
Russian forces conducted a Shahed-136 drone strike against Bila Tserkva, Kyiv Oblast, on October 5, the first Russian strike in Kyiv Oblast since June.[4] Footage from the aftermath of the strike shows apparent damage to residential structures.[5] Russian milbloggers lauded the destructive capability of the Shahed-136 drones but questioned why Russian forces are using such technology to target areas deep in the Ukrainian rear and far removed from active combat zones. That decision fits into the larger pattern of Russian forces expending high-precision technology on areas of Ukraine that hold limited operational significance.[6]
originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: WanderingMrM
Ahem....
...and this...
originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: WanderingMrM
Eta: i also dont think its not beyond the pale for Ukraine to stab the west in the back and use that USD warchest to work something out with russia.
originally posted by: WanderingMrM
originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: WanderingMrM
Eta: i also dont think its not beyond the pale for Ukraine to stab the west in the back and use that USD warchest to work something out with russia.
I suspect something along the lines of the following, if Russia does obliterate the Ukrainian military and take Ukraine. I think a lot of the extremist elements that made it into Europe might use their NATO training as payback for the West backstabbing them.