self assembling nano particles responding to wifi

In this interview, Stew Peters interviews a guy who does microscopy, he studies samples of vaccines under a microscope and switches on the wifi. His slides show something that looks like microcircuitry assembling when the wifi is on, it disassembles when off and then starts to reassemble when on again. If you mention magnetics in vaccines the shills come at you quickly, if you mention Mac addresses coming from the deceased in cemeteries the gulps of laughter derision, and the rest of the disinformation accusers pop up. But these slides are real and Klaus said you were going to get chipped. What part of that don't they understand? Bluetooth connects to just about everything so if you were going to get connected, it is the next logical step.
People actually think that they are getting a shot which if it were a vaccine should have been pulled within the first month of its rollout. It certainly is not a vaccine. But it really is showing the signs of something with a nano technical aspect among its many other negative attributes. Then when patents are researched low and behold DARPA seem to have them. www.bitchute.com...

a reply to: anonentity

Seriously?

You do understand that this is science fiction, don't you, that kind of technology simply does not exist, and even if it did what kind of secret world government would be stupid enough to create a device that responds to household wifi, something so ubiquitous that literally anyone who put a sample of the vax under a microscope would see it because just about every lab in the entire country has wifi?

a reply to: AaarghZombies

something so ubiquitous that literally anyone who put a sample of the vax ........

......... into themselves via injection might find themselves not quite themselves anymore.

a reply to: anonentity

I have 2 different EMF radiation meters, both are not cheap . One thing i noticed beside getting RF readings is that if i measure just magnetic field /electric field , it goes really high if i have mobile phone in other hand and talking to someone. I bet same happens with WIFI .

“When heated, these nanoparticles made by Gang Bao’s lab at Rice can activate select genetically modified insect brain cells. Using different amplitude and field strength of magnetic fields we’ve shown that we can quickly turn on and off specific behaviors in fruit flies using a remotely applied magnetic field. In the future, and in conjunction with the US FDA, we hope to use similar technologies to remotely activate specific neurons in the visual cortex of humans to help restore sight to people that suffer from blindness.”

“In one final experiment, the researchers injected Magneto into the striatum of freely behaving mice, a deep brain structure containing dopamine-producing neurons that are involved in reward and motivation, and then placed the animals into an apparatus split into magnetised a non-magnetised sections. Mice expressing Magneto spent far more time in the magnetised areas than mice that did not, because activation of the protein caused the striatal neurons expressing it to release dopamine, so that the mice found being in those areas rewarding. This shows that Magneto can remotely control the firing of neurons deep within the brain, and also control complex behaviours.”

Mass Formation and the Missionary Mind: A Wounded Warrior's Cry


We are allready in time of neuromodulation / behavioral modification or at least will be soon ....the injections are part of this .

a reply to: anonentity

For the uninitiated, the performance of a transmitter scales directly to the size of the antenna, as does the performance of a receiver. While signal strength drops off exponentially based on distance and insulating mediums.

Link

A device that small physically cannot detect a signal on either the 2.5ghz or 5ghz range that wifi uses, and even if it could detect it (It can't because it violates the laws of physics), it would not be able to do so from inside your body because the antenna is too small to pick up a signal through your skin.

Oh, and that kind of nano technology doesn't exist, period.

originally posted by: myselfaswell
a reply to: AaarghZombies

something so ubiquitous that literally anyone who put a sample of the vax ........

......... into themselves via injection might find themselves not quite themselves anymore.

Why would you program your top secret science fiction technology to react to something that's literally everywhere?

That's like building your secret headquarters underneath a set of floodlights so that everyone can see who comes and goes.

a reply to: AaarghZombies

Oh, and that kind of nano technology doesn't exist, period

You're over looking the possibility that these might be test builds.

a reply to: AaarghZombies

That's like building your secret headquarters underneath a set of floodlights so that everyone can see who comes and goes.

The CIA admitted they were experimenting on people through facebook. People are still using facebook ...... do I really need to spell it out?

a reply to: Kenzo

The article that you're quoting isn't a scientific post, it's a blog entry by a lady named Tessa Lena.

Tessa Lena isn't a scientist, or an engineer, she's a musician Link

You're citing a blog post based on a concepptual album that she wrote link

I wonder why you didn't cite the original article that your quote comes from. Could it be because the original peice includes this exact quote:

Next, religious belief was measured using a version of the Supernatural Belief Scale ( Jong et al. , 2013 ) modified to create two scales which mirror positive and negative aspects of Western religious belief, comparable with the positive and negative immigrant authors in the ethnocentrism measure. The items were presented in random order and rated according to the same scale employed in the immigrant ratings. The positive scale consisted of the following: (i) ‘There exists an all-powerful, all-knowing, loving God’; (ii) ‘There exist good personal spiritual beings, whom we might call angels’ and (iii) ‘Some people will go to Heaven when they die’ (α = 0.90). The negative scale consisted of the following: (i) ‘There exists an evil personal spiritual being, whom we might call the Devil’; (ii) ‘There exist evil, personal spiritual beings, whom we might call demons’ and (iii) ‘Some people will go to Hell when they die’ (α = 0.93). An overall religiosity variable combining both scales was calculated by averaging all six items (α = 0.95).

Or maybe this

This study provides a ‘proof-of-concept’ that adherence to high-level abstract beliefs can be experimentally neuromodulated. However, the present design does not address several key questions that should be pursued in further research. Most notably, in order to create a context in which ideological adherence could be expected to be relatively intense, particularly with regard to religious ideas, we reminded all of our participants of death. Our data therefore do not reveal whether downregulation of the pMFC via TMS would reduce either group bias or religious belief in the absence of a recent threat prime. Relatedly, we have conceptualized the present design as involving two sorts of problems (i.e. mortality and criticism of group values) that may each be addressed by custom-tailored solutions (i.e. religiosity, and derogation of the critical out-group member, respectively). This framing is consistent with the finding that TMS influenced evaluation of the critical author, but not the complimentary author. However, death primes have been found to exaggerate derogation of individuals who criticize in-group values in numerous studies, such that encountering an attack on group values in the aftermath of a reminder of death may constitute a double-shot threat. Thus, the reduction in out-group derogation observed in the TMS condition may reflect a diminution in the impact of the death prime rather than—or in addition to—a diminution in the response to the challenge posed by the out-group critic. Future research incorporating a non-threat control condition will be essential to ascertain whether downregulation of the pMFC reduces out-group derogation, or avowed religious belief, in the absence of a background threat.

Link

Plus, it was a psychology experiment, not mind control using nano robots.

originally posted by: myselfaswell
a reply to: AaarghZombies

Oh, and that kind of nano technology doesn't exist, period

You're over looking the possibility that these might be test builds.

In a vax handed out to a researcher?

The absolute cutting edge of science cannot even get close to this.

originally posted by: myselfaswell
a reply to: AaarghZombies

That's like building your secret headquarters underneath a set of floodlights so that everyone can see who comes and goes.

The CIA admitted they were experimenting on people through facebook. People are still using facebook ...... do I really need to spell it out?

The CIA weren't using nano-machines, and source for this, because you can't just make a statement like that without putting it in context first.

a reply to: Kenzo

I have 2 different EMF radiation meters, both are not cheap . One thing i noticed beside getting RF readings is that if i measure just magnetic field /electric field , it goes really high if i have mobile phone in other hand and talking to someone. I bet same happens with WIFI .

Would you care to include the numbers, and the make or model of the EMF meter.

a reply to: AaarghZombies

Mate, you're assuming that everything is out there in the public domain. Do I need to suggest how mistaken that is?

Anyway, it's late, I've just cracked a red and it's time for some Chilli Con Carnage*.

*Red beans and me, no es bueno, mucho gas.

a reply to: anonentity

The gravesite thing , how does the signal go through 6 feet of dirt.
Tptb have been telling us openly what they are doing, but if you bring it up you are crazy.

a reply to: AaarghZombies

I try, my phone battery just end so have to recharge.

a reply to: AaarghZombies

Nano Sensors

WNSN[ editby]edit on 9/9/22 by Grenade because: (no reason given)