It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: AaarghZombies
a reply to: anonentity
How on Earth can you say that when Phizer wanted to hide the data from the public for seventy-five years?
They don't, they simply have protection against people spamming them with data requests. The 75 years isn't how long they have to release all of the data, it's how long it would take them to release it in batched of 50,000 documents a month. On account of there being millions of pages of documents.
They hid and buried data in their own trials
Link, please.
It's a business model that works.
For them, maybe, but not for governments, so why would governments go along with it. Especially socialist governments like those in Europe, or like China, Russia, and the African governments who make zero money from this.
Why would Trump go along with this?
As for the front men, they are like everyone else "Only as good as their word"
And 99.999 percent of them are just regular people. Coroners, pharmacists, grad students. People who have nothing to gain, but everything to lose if they are found tampering with the data.
Plus, there are just so many people with access to the data. Even if 99.999 percent of them were corrupt, that would still leave hundreds of thousands of people who weren't all around the world.
Pushing bad health products on a naive public is not new
And in previous cases, such as the opioid crisis, people all over the industry were blowing the whistle years ago. Nothing was really secret from the very beginning.
it's a gift to pharmaceutical companies.
Maybe in the US, but in much of the rest of the world they're prices are capped, and they have to go through narrow business channels. You're argument might be plausible in the US, but somewhere like France or Germany it's absolutely not. What they gain in selling the vax at a tightly controlled price they lose by not being able to sell other products like cosmetics because people went out less.
Most people will do what is suggested by experts even if the science is screaming "Don't do it
For example?
Most of the experts are socially screened so they don't turn people off
Like Faucci?
originally posted by: AaarghZombies
a reply to: anonentity
How on Earth can you say that when Phizer wanted to hide the data from the public for seventy-five years?
They don't, they simply have protection against people spamming them with data requests. The 75 years isn't how long they have to release all of the data, it's how long it would take them to release it in batched of 50,000 documents a month. On account of there being millions of pages of documents.
They hid and buried data in their own trials
Link, please.
It's a business model that works.
For them, maybe, but not for governments, so why would governments go along with it. Especially socialist governments like those in Europe, or like China, Russia, and the African governments who make zero money from this.
Why would Trump go along with this?
As for the front men, they are like everyone else "Only as good as their word"
And 99.999 percent of them are just regular people. Coroners, pharmacists, grad students. People who have nothing to gain, but everything to lose if they are found tampering with the data.
Plus, there are just so many people with access to the data. Even if 99.999 percent of them were corrupt, that would still leave hundreds of thousands of people who weren't all around the world.
Pushing bad health products on a naive public is not new
And in previous cases, such as the opioid crisis, people all over the industry were blowing the whistle years ago. Nothing was really secret from the very beginning.
it's a gift to pharmaceutical companies.
Maybe in the US, but in much of the rest of the world they're prices are capped, and they have to go through narrow business channels. You're argument might be plausible in the US, but somewhere like France or Germany it's absolutely not. What they gain in selling the vax at a tightly controlled price they lose by not being able to sell other products like cosmetics because people went out less.
Most people will do what is suggested by experts even if the science is screaming "Don't do it
For example?
Most of the experts are socially screened so they don't turn people off
Like Faucci?
Basically the TORY PARTY are enemy's of the state, it is even on there manifesto to REDUCE the state, to REDUCE government
Despite continuing deaths from COVID-19, in 2021 mortality from other causes has been about 9% lower than usual (in England, January to September 2021). In the midst of a pandemic, how could this have happened? Did the pandemic, and our lockdowns, unexpectedly reduce deaths from other causes? Or have deaths during the pandemic ‘displaced’ mortality that would otherwise occur at a later point in time?
This analysis explores the story behind this 9% figure
The CDC isn't "admitting" that it's wrong.