It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: TheReaversChain
Well so what we have equates to a popularity contest. Slick burns, no actual points being heard, and pokes. Look I could not care less about the star ratio but it does kind of maybe illustrate where everyone's focus is. And insinuate that is the ticket: some fun over burns.
I didn't say what I did for no reason or to get into a damn contest. And being that when I called the other poster out people did more and more of it means that you are partaking in the "joy" of all this and I feel like I have to clarify I'm not down with that aspect of it. So that people don't glance over entirely what I said before or fail to ask anything of substance and really do make it about a slick burn. I'm one person and I'm fine being ignored but please dont insult me and drag me into American politics with cute pokes. Take me at my word. Stop doing this. Grow up on here.
~~~~final word~~~~ except, it wasn't.
Anyone care to point me in the direction of more mature clientele? I'll still come here for news and all but this stuff is maybe not up my alley for one or two particular subjects. No one asks "what did you mean?" And everyone just assumes I'm fine making my points. I'm up for more mature discourse you can hit me up in my PMS. I didn't say anything to change the culture or be a point maker because I get misinterpreted as just wanting to touch minds.
originally posted by: TheReaversChain
a reply to: shaemac
I'm not interested in slick burns. So I dont care how versed you are.
originally posted by: shaemac
originally posted by: TheReaversChain
a reply to: shaemac
I'm not interested in slick burns. So I dont care how versed you are.
Is that a hairstyle? Or something that happens on race tracks?
WTF is a slick burn?
originally posted by: optimisticcontrarian
today's American and British men have an aging and unhealthy population due to no war and therefore no natural selection
Hey Captain Brilliance, weve been at war almost constantly for over 20 years
Youre either super super young or ignorant
I don't think American and British men can fight wars anymore.
originally posted by: lordcomac
originally posted by: Freeborn
a reply to: guaman
I think when push comes to shove you'd find that they are just as tough and resilient as their predecessors.
Blue hair gender fluid children in their 20's aren't going to make it through basic training.
If they survived actual combat they might snap out of it and prove to be "tough and resilient"...
Now I will say, I'm not exposed to the current generation of teenagers outside of the internet- so it's entirely possible the bulk of them aren't whining on the internet about how they want to be commies.... Hopefully the silent majority is still a thing.
Is it me or has ATS had an influx of Russian keyboard warriors of late? It just shows how awesome ATS is that russia troll factories think by posting here it will change the worlds views on Mad Vlad.
I'm beginning to think "The Undeclared War" is more than just fiction.
originally posted by: shaemac
originally posted by: Freeborn
a reply to: guaman
I think when push comes to shove you'd find that they are just as tough and resilient as their predecessors.
As one who was previously married to the military and has a lot of veteran friends and knows parents with kids currently enlisted.No. No the new pussified military is not tough, nor resilient and nothing like their predecessors.
We are in serious trouble!