It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Nyiah
In lieu of that option or the brick wall, just grab the nearest chain link fence & have your Movie Moment.
originally posted by: whiteblack
In order to attack USA with nuke, the satellites must be destroyed first so defence system can't do anything to stop nuke
Therefore it'll never happens at least in our life time
originally posted by: Notabot12345666
From a world political standpoint, would a blue state be more at risk for nuclear attack or would it be a red state?
originally posted by: Violater1
I don't know if this is common or not, but the number of private aircraft leaving New York is too numerous to count.
originally posted by: litterbaux
a reply to: Mantiss2021
You are correct. I think there would be warning which is how you would have the time to get inside and close windows ect. On the flip side if it were a dirty bomb in a shipping container like previously mentioned, the EMP would be minor, if at all, but would create a lot of fallout.
Both situations would completely suck if you're anywhere near ground zero.
Honestly the likelihood of this happening is so distant it's probably not even worth talking about but it's so easy to know what to do in that split second decision it's probably worth having the knowledge.
Get inside, get to the center of mass of the building and hope someone turned off the HVAC system. Wait......
originally posted by: anonentity
a reply to: visitedbythem
That's right a Tsunami bomb just wipes all the major coastal cities out. Not much fallout compared to an air blast.
originally posted by: anonentity
a reply to: visitedbythem
That's right a Tsunami bomb just wipes all the major coastal cities out. Not much fallout compared to an air blast.
originally posted by: StoutBroux
originally posted by: Violater1
I don't know if this is common or not, but the number of private aircraft leaving New York is too numerous to count.
Is the picture relative to the new announcement? Time and date, link? please.
I get that it's air craft moving in a certain location. But an image search shows a lot of similar pics in many places with similar activity. Just trying to figure out the relativity.
originally posted by: Violater1
a reply to: Violater1
This is not good advice. 1: The atomic blast will cause a huge EMP, knocking out anything that is electrical for hundreds of miles.
Putin could use a smaller Tsar nuke, 50 Kilotons on NYCX. Here is an example provided by nuclearsecrecy.com...
understanding the colors is sickening.
originally posted by: merka
originally posted by: Violater1
a reply to: Violater1
This is not good advice. 1: The atomic blast will cause a huge EMP, knocking out anything that is electrical for hundreds of miles.
Putin could use a smaller Tsar nuke, 50 Kilotons on NYCX. Here is an example provided by nuclearsecrecy.com...
understanding the colors is sickening.
50kt isnt a "smaller Tsar nuke" - you missed a couple of zeros to even reach 1/10th the force of the Tsar bomba.
50kt is a firecracker.
A ballistic missile today has 10+ warheads with 700kt+ yields each.
a reply to: beyondknowledge
Stay tuned? To what exactly. All consumer electronics are fried unless you have a radio, batteries, etc inside a refrigerator.