Supreme Court pick Ketanji Brown Jackson .

a reply to: shooterbrody

No, you clearly ignore that fact that when the previous President verbally stated he was only considering a woman, no one here lost their minds, they were very very supportive with no mention of the other 97% of candidates who didn't even get a consideration.

One thing if you read the thread you may notice, even though I don't think her experience was that qualified, I certainly wasn't on there bashing her, nor did she really need any defending as lavish praise was bestowed upon her with again no mention of the President's overtly sexist choice. I would have defended his choice of a female but wasn't necessary for some odd reason.

a reply to: shooterbrody

So then do you admit that Trump was wrong and a sexist when his primary qualification in picking Barrett was that she was female? If so, why didn't you say anything at the time? Doesn't your silence about Barrett's gender while supporting her as luck mean that you are also sexist?

a reply to: frogs453
No matter if "no one here" lost their mind or not, racism is wrong. It has no place in the hiring process for a federal job. You justifying such is disgusting.

Your skin color or gender should not determine if you get a job, or a job interview, in 2022.

Rules for thee not for me

a reply to: frogs453

Amy Comey though was part of the inner circle and even though she may not have had trial experience that is not what I would consider something needed to be a judge. She worked more than enough in the inner workings and behind the scenes.

She was a law clerk for the Court of Appeals and SCOTUS under Scalia.
She worked the Court of Appeals the same amount of time as Jackson.
She was an accomplished and awarded Law Professor for 17 years with Federal Appointments

She was the 3 appointee, and a woman after 2 guys, who were all on the list Trump provided during his 2016 campaign. Where is Joe's list?

Only issue I had with Comey was her religious views.

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: shooterbrody

So then do you admit that Trump was wrong and a sexist when his primary qualification in picking Barrett was that she was female? If so, why didn't you say anything at the time? Doesn't your silence about Barrett's gender while supporting her as luck mean that you are also sexist?

If you will show her sex was trumps primary qualification, as mister biden stated, then sure.
Should he have replaced rbg with someone else?

How you judge my "silence" would be interesting to know. As if you were the arbiter of such.

Are you in favor of race and gender requirements for federal jobs?

a reply to: shooterbrody

I will be putting forth a nominee next week. It will be a woman,

Source

a reply to: Xcalibur254

The President told reporters earlier Saturday there about 45 people on his list, but he does have a "short list" for potential nominees.

From the same you provided.
Are all 45 ladies?



Are you in favor of race and gender requirements for federal jobs?
tfaia

a reply to: shooterbrody

It's just very odd though that the gender issue is now a factor when it wasn't a few years ago. Why now? Why not then? Yes your silence does speak. You were here then, yet you did not raise this issue then.

If women or other races are marginalized and excluded even though they are as,or if not more qualified than others, that's a sad state of affairs and apparently we have not yet reached that equality that is strived for. Call me racist if you wish.

a reply to: frogs453

But? WHATABOUT !!!!!! 🤣🤣🤣🤣👋🏼👋🏼👋🏼

a reply to: frogs453
As if it is not racist to hire someone because of their skin color.
It is disgusting.
Your support of such is as well.

You attempting to deflect, but but but trump is weak as well.
This is ALL mister biden. He said he would discriminate based on skin color and gender, and then did.
In this day and age for people to openly support discrimination because of skin color is unacceptable.

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: frogs453

But? WHATABOUT !!!!!! 🤣🤣🤣🤣👋🏼👋🏼👋🏼

Worse than whatabout they support this blatant racism.

a reply to: Xcalibur254

Because that is what he picked from his list of 20

www.cnn.com...

This was in your linked article. There were men on his list as well as women.

Lol ok Shooter, I'm a flaming racist, sexist. You feel better now? Hopefully we see a fully diverse court in the near future. It would actually be a good thing. Maybe males, females and all races will be considered equally, that is the goal.

Let's see the next pick. I have a feeling a seat is opening up soon as Judge Thomas seems to have a conflict of interest with his openly supporting insurrectionist wife. That last lone dissenting vote they had on the J6 request for WH documents appears to be a big problem.

originally posted by: frogs453
Lol ok Shooter, I'm a flaming racist, sexist. You feel better now? Hopefully we see a fully diverse court in the near future. It would actually be a good thing. Maybe males, females and all races will be considered equally, that is the goal.

Diversity without racism would be great.
Sadly that is not what mister biden is doing, he admitted himself they were not considered equally.

a reply to: frogs453

Let's see the next pick. I have a feeling a seat is opening up soon as Judge Thomas seems to have a conflict of interest with his openly supporting insurrectionist wife. That last lone dissenting vote they had on the J6 request for WH documents appears to be a big problem.

Oh really?
How does that work?
You will hold a husband accountable because his wife has a different political opinion than you?

You people are by far the absolute most tolerant I have encountered.

a reply to: Xcalibur254

I'd say they're pretty irrelevant. First off, it's just a test to measure a person's logic and reasoning. It doesn't actually have anything to do with legal knowledge.

Yeah I know right , since when is Logic and Reasoning relevant I mean this is Washington we are talking about .

Since the founding of this country, there have been 120 Supreme Court justices. We have seen the LSAT scores for zero of them. So why are LSAT scores suddenly important when the nominee is a black woman?

You seriously think it's something to do with her being Black ? Jesus Christ !!!

NO ONE CARES THAT SHE IS BLACK EXCEPT THE DEMOCRATS APPARENTLY

No one has mentioned her skin color except the democrats , and maybe her LSAT scores came up because someone took a look at them and they were horrible . LSAT's are just a formality for any one in the Legal profession and looking at them is a formality and it does not become a problem or even get mentioned unless there is a problem with your LSAT's which clearly there is with her .

a reply to: shooterbrody

No but when you have a conflict of interest you recuse yourself from the case. They each can believe what they want. You should not be able to hear and vote on a case in which there may be documents that can incriminate your wife or husband, whichever. I mean unless he had no clue she was texting Mark Meadows and Jared. Possible I suppose, yet he was still the only dissenting voice so he likely knew. When he recovers they certainly should inquire if he knew.

a reply to: frogs453
You don't even know the particulars yet you want him thrown off the bench?
Wow
I have to wonder if your opinion would be different if he wasn't black.

a reply to: frogs453

You should not be able to hear and vote on a case in which there may be documents that can incriminate your wife or husband, whichever.

That is pretty scary.
Big smiles!
Big smiles!

a reply to: shooterbrody

We do know that texts from her appear in Mark Meadows phone, spouting Q anon theories and noting that they cannot stop in trying to overturn the election. We do know that the J6 had a case go to SCOTUS to get WH documents and other related materials released to them. We do know that 8 were in favor, that Justice Thomas voted against it. I stated he should be questioned regarding why he didn't recuse himself. As for the previously stated position may become open, I wasn't implying he would be removed, I think he may retire due to "health" reasons.

I don't like black people now? Weird I thought you were just all over me for supporting Jackson. Dang, what am I supposed to do about half of my family?