It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Supreme Court pick Ketanji Brown Jackson .

page: 10
26
<< 7  8  9    11  12  13 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 24 2022 @ 05:54 PM
link   
a reply to: asabuvsobelow




It's called not playing the Race Card and no I don't know , so I'm giving them the benefit of the doubt regardless of how obvious the hypocrisy maybe .


LOL No you're not.



posted on Mar, 24 2022 @ 05:55 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: shooterbrody




Not looking at 80%of the population because of skin color or gender is disgusting.
You who are supporting this are racist.


Assuming that there was no black woman as equally as qualified as Brett Kavanaugh is discrimination.
Assuming that there was no black woman as equally as qualified as Niel Gorsuch is discrimination.
Assuming that there was no black woman as equally as qualified as Amy Comey Barrett is discrimination.


Respectively Sir , YAFOS .



posted on Mar, 24 2022 @ 05:59 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: asabuvsobelow




It's called not playing the Race Card and no I don't know , so I'm giving them the benefit of the doubt regardless of how obvious the hypocrisy maybe .


LOL No you're not.


Sure I am , It's how the politicians play it you never assume anything



posted on Mar, 24 2022 @ 07:21 PM
link   
a reply to: asabuvsobelow

So...."gaslighting"?



posted on Mar, 24 2022 @ 09:05 PM
link   
Trouble...

It Looks like a Justice Jackson will have to recuse herself from any cases involving sex-discrimination, sexual-orientation, sex-change operations, etc..

thefederalist.com...




posted on Mar, 24 2022 @ 09:09 PM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

Lol you're just angry she didn't allow Marsha's lame attempt to get her to fall into her probably mixed up rabbit hole. As she said, if the issue ends up in court, she will consider the argument from both parties and apply the law.



posted on Mar, 24 2022 @ 09:16 PM
link   
a reply to: frogs453

Does she know what a women is? If not, then how can we be sure she's actually a black woman like Biden promised to nominate?



posted on Mar, 24 2022 @ 09:25 PM
link   
a reply to: ketsuko


She referenced her daughters and being a woman, so you can be pretty sure she has an idea. Would have been better though if she got Amy's tough questions like "what are your hobbies".



posted on Mar, 24 2022 @ 09:31 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
Please answer these questions.

1) What is a woman?
2) When does life begin?
3) When does a person enjoy full equal protection under the law?

Nobody can factually answer those questions without inserting their opinion.



I can understand how that would be difficult when the job your applying for entailed asserting your opinion.



posted on Mar, 24 2022 @ 09:49 PM
link   

originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: carewemust

Lol you're just angry she didn't allow Marsha's lame attempt to get her to fall into her probably mixed up rabbit hole. As she said, if the issue ends up in court, she will consider the argument from both parties and apply the law.


I wonder would you be Running to her rescue if she were a Republican with the same credentials and sentence record ?

or ohhhh if she were a Republican Man with the same Credentials and sentence record ?




posted on Mar, 24 2022 @ 09:53 PM
link   
a reply to: frogs453




Would have been better though if she got Amy's tough questions like "what are your hobbies".


so your asserting that the Democrats didn't try to rip Amy to Shreds ?

And that the Democrats are not feeding ketanji baby questions ?
edit on 24-3-2022 by asabuvsobelow because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 24 2022 @ 09:57 PM
link   
Wait until we get to her yearbook....
Black panther this...beanpie that.....
Honorable elija muhammed ....
Wait...pedo problems???



posted on Mar, 24 2022 @ 10:17 PM
link   
a reply to: shooterbrody




Wait...pedo problems???


This is just my Conspiracy mind talking but all the Pedo stuff is probably just knocking on the Cult doors she has walked through .



posted on Mar, 24 2022 @ 10:31 PM
link   

originally posted by: asabuvsobelow
a reply to: shooterbrody




Wait...pedo problems???


This is just my Conspiracy mind talking but all the Pedo stuff is probably just knocking on the Cult doors she has walked through .

She issued those....she get to stand by them.
Those supporting such are just as disgusting imo.



posted on Mar, 24 2022 @ 10:32 PM
link   
a reply to: asabuvsobelow

If you were attacking her for these very same things, yes I would. She's well qualified. If she were conservative she still has the same qualifications. I mean to be honest if she was not picked by Biden, you wouldn't know whether she was conservative or not. Would you?

I never heard any type of radical agenda she had. I mean she's on a school board that has radical books according to Cruz but he chose a school to send his children to that has radical books too, so it can't really be an issue.



posted on Mar, 24 2022 @ 10:45 PM
link   
If you people don't draw the line at pedophiles then where is it?

This is not hard people.



posted on Mar, 24 2022 @ 10:51 PM
link   
I'm not a biologist but if I were asked if I knew what a woman was my answer would be a mammel with two X chromosomes.

It's not hard.

If you choose to take a different path in life other than what your parents gave you genetically, that's all you. I couldn't care less.



posted on Mar, 25 2022 @ 12:32 AM
link   
a reply to: litterbaux




I'm not a biologist but if I were asked if I knew what a woman was my answer would be a mammel with two X chromosomes.


Is a six month old female infant with two X chromosomes a "woman"?



posted on Mar, 25 2022 @ 07:52 AM
link   
a reply to: Xcalibur254

Are you suggesting it is unreasonable to know the LSAT scores of nominees to the highest court in the land? Do you think it is irrelevant?

As a non-lawyer, I see the matter as being relevant.



posted on Mar, 25 2022 @ 08:45 AM
link   
a reply to: Sookiechacha

That sounds like preparing for gender neutrality at birth and then let the babies chose what they want to be an male of female and when they point to the gender, lets mutilate them to the sex of choice before puberty strike.

Yep is and agenda alright.



new topics

top topics



 
26
<< 7  8  9    11  12  13 >>

log in

join