It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Evidence of an Ancient Advanced civilization that spanned the Globe

page: 11
87
<< 8  9  10    12  13  14 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 14 2022 @ 10:45 PM
link   
a reply to: Byrd

Well, either ancient civilizations were interconnected and came into contact with each other in the past(which archaeologists say was impossible) , or a long-lost mother culture predates all of the ancient civilizations on Earth, and it is from this mother culture that ancient civilization such as the Aztecs and Egyptians inherited their knowledge from. Something was responsible for the striking similarity of ancient art, architecture, symbolism, mythology, religion and scientific knowledge between ancient civilizations such as the Ancient Egyptian, Ancient Aztecs and Maya among others.



posted on Feb, 14 2022 @ 11:44 PM
link   
a reply to: RAY1990
Critical thinking skills.
Working memory allows the brain to retrieve, process and hold in mind several chunks of information all at one time to complete a task. A particularly sophisticated kind of working memory involves the ability to hold something in attention while you’re being distracted.

The Adineta vaga genome for 116 major conserved metazoan genes involved in direct damage reversal repair, BER, NER, AER, MMR, HR, NHEJ, and replicative and translesion synthesis. We identified 107 of these genes representing a total of 270 gene copies. We also identified four genes, three present in two copies and one in four copies, that have been acquired from non-metazoan sources.
Metazoans are monophyletic as they are developed from a single ancestor. But our DNA shows non-metazoan genes encoded that happened around 50,000 years ago(not an exact time is known yet).



posted on Feb, 14 2022 @ 11:51 PM
link   
a reply to: Harte

Biomedical Engineer.



posted on Feb, 15 2022 @ 12:20 AM
link   

originally posted by: Timely
I find ancient undocumented history (anything not destroyed or
Obfuscated eg. Library of Alexandria) fascinating!

I doubt that we will ever know the absolute truth, although I believe we will keep uncovering juicy tidbits of our past that one day will paint a clearer picture of who we are and where our true origins lie.

Nice thread!

Me too, this used to be my favorite subject. History and archaeology generally too. I come back and forth to it.



posted on Feb, 15 2022 @ 12:21 AM
link   
a reply to: Akragon

I tend to believe that there is more to history than we are being taught.

There is evidence of Pre-Columbian contact between the Old World and New World.

The megalithic structures including at Balbek and the Pyramids of Egypt raise a lot of questions.

How did ancients lift 800-1200 ton stones at Balbek? Not sure I've ever heard a great explanation. I know I know, "it was the Romans (tm)."



posted on Feb, 15 2022 @ 03:14 AM
link   

originally posted by: Madviking
a reply to: Akragon

...


How did ancients lift 800-1200 ton stones at Balbek? Not sure I've ever heard a great explanation. I know I know, "it was the Romans (tm)."


As discussed here.
edit on 15-2-2022 by Hooke because: edit link



posted on Feb, 15 2022 @ 03:30 AM
link   
a reply to: mcsnacks77

Can you explain this in layman's terms?

All I'm finding is research involving horizontal gene transfer and it would appear there's little to no evidence of this occuring in humans. As for the rest I'm not sure what you're getting at. Are you saying humans gained cognitive ability from metazoan animals? They're simple life forms...

Everything else I'm seeing is related to how metazoan lifeforms reproduce.

Please provide links.



posted on Feb, 15 2022 @ 08:15 AM
link   
"Therefore its name is called Babel, because there the LORD confused the language of all the earth; and from there the LORD scattered them abroad over the face of all the earth."



posted on Feb, 15 2022 @ 03:50 PM
link   

originally posted by: vNex92
a reply to: mcsnacks77

Why dont we try the same technique in today's era than?


That challenge has been made multiple times for many decades and to date no has taken it up. I suspect people HAVE tried to do it,failed, and not reported it.

I mean getting granite and putting it under pressure is not difficult - yet no one does a control experiment - easy to do and to prove themselves correct - nope easier to just claim it over and over.

One wonder why not? eh!



posted on Feb, 15 2022 @ 04:03 PM
link   

originally posted by: Plunkenstein
a reply to: RAY1990

(Haven't read the entire thread, so sorry if this has been covered). Seems to be a quite massive burden of proof on how the perfectly precise grooves and "rivets" on the H-blocks of Puma Punku -- which was an ancient complex or temple of some sort that was mysteriously blown apart (by what had to be a supermassive force) -- could have been done with only copper or stone tools. That stonework is very apparently exactly what it very strongly appears to be: good evidence of advanced machining in ancient times. Doesn't necessarily denote aliens, but clearly lost science, technology.



Nope just experience masonry skills done by motivated and skilled craftsmen

If you found a piece of stone from that period which was unfinished and abandoned what would it look like

We we have found them and here is one



So, what does it show? It shows a mix of bashing, pecking, abrasive use and guess what no high tech so that would mean they used simple methods to shape the stones.

Of course that and the quarries show they used simple methods to removed them (most of the sandstone was just picked up from surface finds) and oddly not a single instance of any high technology anywhere in any aspect of their culture.

Why well done the 'H" are similar but not exact duplicates - why would that be?

www.academia.edu...



posted on Feb, 15 2022 @ 04:15 PM
link   

originally posted by: Akragon
maybe these polygonal structures are the same people moving from one place to another... the incas admit they didn't build the huge megalithic walls... they were there when they arrived...


You do realize that the Inca were very late the civilization game right? They arose nearly 4,000 years after the Old Kingdom in Egypt.

The Inca civilization arose from the Peruvian highlands sometime in the early 13th century AD, they were the last in a long line of of earlier civilizations and advanced cultures. The Inca incorporated the Tiwanaku and made them the Empires masons.



They were absolutely right they took over a lot of older cultures who had also worked stone.



posted on Feb, 15 2022 @ 04:19 PM
link   

originally posted by: Madviking
a reply to: Akragon

How did ancients lift 800-1200 ton stones at Balbek? Not sure I've ever heard a great explanation. I know I know, "it was the Romans (tm)."


They moved the little ones, the trilithons the 2-4th heaviest stones moved by humans. The big heavy ones approximately 1-1200 tons were never moved...probably because it exceeded their ability to do so

Very, very few heavy stones were moved in ancient times - Why? Because it fricken hard to do and they need a long time, superior rope technology, and the will to do so.



posted on Feb, 15 2022 @ 04:23 PM
link   

originally posted by: mcsnacks77
a reply to: Byrd

Well, either ancient civilizations were interconnected and came into contact with each other in the past(which archaeologists say was impossible) , or a long-lost mother culture predates all of the ancient civilizations on Earth, and it is from this mother culture that ancient civilization such as the Aztecs and Egyptians inherited their knowledge from.


Problem if the Aztecs got their info from the same source as the Egyptians and the AE civilization began around 3,200 BCE and the Aztecs in the 1300 AD- where exactly was this long lost culture doing for 4,400 years? Before the Aztecs finally got organized?



posted on Feb, 15 2022 @ 05:18 PM
link   

originally posted by: Hanslune

originally posted by: Madviking
a reply to: Akragon

How did ancients lift 800-1200 ton stones at Balbek? Not sure I've ever heard a great explanation. I know I know, "it was the Romans (tm)."


They moved the little ones, the trilithons the 2-4th heaviest stones moved by humans. The big heavy ones approximately 1-1200 tons were never moved...probably because it exceeded their ability to do so

Very, very few heavy stones were moved in ancient times - Why? Because it fricken hard to do and they need a long time, superior rope technology, and the will to do so.


How did they move the Trilithon ones, and get them up into place? Honest question.



posted on Feb, 15 2022 @ 10:39 PM
link   

originally posted by: Madviking


How did they move the Trilithon ones, and get them up into place? Honest question.


No one knows but we can speculate that they did what other ancient cultures did they dragged then on sledges by manpower from quarry up a ramp and pulled them into position.



They may have used winches but there is no evidence they had them at that time.





gilgamesh42.wordpress.com...

i0.wp.com...

www.abovetopsecret.com...

www.academia.edu... tween_the_Temples_at_Heliopolis_Baalbek_and_


edit on 15/2/22 by Hanslune because: (no reason given)

edit on 15/2/22 by Hanslune because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 15 2022 @ 11:05 PM
link   

originally posted by: Madviking

originally posted by: Hanslune

originally posted by: Madviking
a reply to: Akragon

How did ancients lift 800-1200 ton stones at Balbek? Not sure I've ever heard a great explanation. I know I know, "it was the Romans (tm)."


They moved the little ones, the trilithons the 2-4th heaviest stones moved by humans. The big heavy ones approximately 1-1200 tons were never moved...probably because it exceeded their ability to do so

Very, very few heavy stones were moved in ancient times - Why? Because it fricken hard to do and they need a long time, superior rope technology, and the will to do so.


How did they move the Trilithon ones, and get them up into place? Honest question.


They had a form of crane called a "shadouf".... however, what they did was more logical (and you can see it in place in the Temple of Karnak) (click for photo) -- they built ramps of mud brick and simply slid them up.

That section of Karnak was an area that they quit building on when the pharaoh who commissioned it died, if memory serves.



posted on Feb, 15 2022 @ 11:46 PM
link   

originally posted by: Madviking
a reply to: Akragon

I tend to believe that there is more to history than we are being taught.


There is... because there's so MUCH to teach. No kid is going to sit through all the details... and darn few adults do.

If you want it in depth then you need to learn Latin and Greek as well as the language of the country and then whatever language the research is usually written in.

For my Egyptology certificate (Bachelor's equivalent) I read more than 20 books and over 100 papers, learned some hieroglyphs and ancient Egyptian and struggled with German. If I wanted a Masters or PhD, I'd have to learn either German or French reasonably well and read several hundred papers and around 40 books. Museum visits, learning about technology (and sometimes hands on or watching profs with demonstrations)

And that would be enough to specialize in one area of Egyptian history.

Imagine yourself having to do all that reading just for ONE area of history (3000 years and one country) ... and now for every country in the world.

...and THEN... learn you math, language (English or whatever), science, social studies for your country, etc, etc.

As a ten year old.

So, no. They don't teach you everything... just like they don't teach you tensor analysis in math in school.



posted on Feb, 16 2022 @ 03:03 AM
link   
a reply to: RAY1990

Wang
ubmed has about 30 tests and procedures documented on DNA and the human brain evolution.
Laymens terms: All organisms on the planet can be traced back to the starting point of life on planet Earth, their DNA codes are based on a single code. The first human race has 3 divisions: Homo sapiens, Neanderthals and Denisovans. The Denisovans DNA is the one that has structures not found on this planet. And they are the ones whose
Brain development was faster than evolution could be credited for.



posted on Feb, 16 2022 @ 05:11 AM
link   

originally posted by: Hanslune
They may have used winches but there is no evidence they had them at that time.

Hans, are you saying there is no evidence that Romans had winches in the 1st Century CE?

Harte



posted on Feb, 16 2022 @ 05:13 AM
link   

originally posted by: Madviking
How did they move the Trilithon ones, and get them up into place? Honest question.

These large ashlars never had to be lifted at all.
The quarry is uphill from the site and the location of these stones in the temple is ground level.

Honest answer.

Harte




top topics



 
87
<< 8  9  10    12  13  14 >>

log in

join