FOIA docs reveal Pfizer shot caused avalanche of miscarriages, stillborn babies

a reply to: M5xaz

I didn't think I was going to need to explain basic human biology to you but here we are.

The data set covers a three month period. A human pregnancy generally lasts nine months. Ergo the outcome of most of the pregnancies is going to be unknown.

When you consider that most pregnancies are conceived in the winter months that means most of these pregnancies would have been in the 1st trimester.

When do most miscarriages occur? The 1st trimester.

Since this data was released independent studies have been performed looking specifically at pregnancy and these vaccines. They have all found that the vaccines have no effect on birth rates.

So, once again you are basing your hysteria on nothing.

a reply to: 727Sky

I am waiting for the local hospitals to say something to the local papers about a big decline in births in our county. I'll be honest, we have a high spanish population and they can be relied on to have kids. But the birth announcements in the paper have been as low as I've ever seen. With a county population of over 400,000 a birth every other day or less among two big hospitals is not normal. i used to see four or five a day.

a reply to: Xcalibur254

I did not think I have to explain basic math to you, but here we are....actually, I did.

At no time in human history did women ever get 28 losses out of 32 pregnancies, even in the first trimester.
Basic biology

originally posted by: DontTreadOnMe

Is low dose aspirin mandated anywhere?
Boosters?
Job loss?

Everything has side effects.
Almost none of them are forced. [Oxygen, water and nutrition don't count

]

That there my friend is a totally different debate. You all want to attack the vaccine because the Goverment sucks in trying to mandate it. The vaccine is as safe or safer than any other one, and as you said they all have cases of negative side effects, but you all want to make the vaccine the bogyman and the real bogyman is the government trying to mandate it and canx people who do not want it.

originally posted by: Xtrozero

originally posted by: DontTreadOnMe

Is low dose aspirin mandated anywhere?
Boosters?
Job loss?

Everything has side effects.
Almost none of them are forced. [Oxygen, water and nutrition don't count

]

That there my friend is a totally different debate. You all want to attack the vaccine because the Goverment sucks in trying to mandate it. The vaccine is as safe or safer than any other one, and as you said they all have cases of negative side effects, but you all want to make the vaccine the bogyman and the real bogyman is the government trying to mandate it and canx people who do not want it.

Did you just say the "vaccine" is "safer than any other one"?

What?

a reply to: M5xaz

You're right. If 32 pregnancies are ending in the 1st trimester we're getting 32 losses.

originally posted by: Dutchowl

I am waiting for the local hospitals to say something to the local papers about a big decline in births in our county. I'll be honest, we have a high spanish population and they can be relied on to have kids. But the birth announcements in the paper have been as low as I've ever seen. With a county population of over 400,000 a birth every other day or less among two big hospitals is not normal. i used to see four or five a day.

America, EU, China, Japan and a handful of other countries have been in negative birth rates for a good while now. If we didn't have immigration our population would be declining. What is causing this is economics, as in kids stop being an economical asset to families as countries progress from the poverty level to middle class. They are free labor in poverty stricken countries and a cost burden in countries where they are no longer used as free labor.

Add in that many younger people do not want to get married and do not want to have the burden of kids and yes the birthrates get lower. The max population of the planet will be about 11 billion in 2100 and that is about it, still a rather huge number of people.

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

The independent real world studies have shown safety an efficacy to be better than the majority of vaccines currently used which is to be expected as it had the biggest sample size and resources allocated in the design/clinical trail stage than any other drug or vaccine in human history.

It's not the most effective vaccine though as four shots of Polio is 99% effective and two shots of MMR can be up to 97% effective but is one of the safer vaccines/drugs with less than a fifth of the risk of serious side effects of either of those two.

originally posted by: M5xaz

I did not think I have to explain basic math to you, but here we are....actually, I did.

At no time in human history did women ever get 28 losses out of 32 pregnancies, even in the first trimester.
Basic biology

So are you suggesting that all pregnant women who get the vaccine will have a 90% chance of losing their babies? One would think if it was even 10% past the norm the data would be screaming in from all over the world.

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0

Did you just say the "vaccine" is "safer than any other one"?

What?

Yep,.... What?

Show me a data point in history where billons of people are monitored at the level the world is doing with the COVID vaccine? You are all freaking out over anything that is put on bitchute and I have yet to find any credibility with anything I actually looked into on that crap.

Case in point, there is a 100 posts on ATS about 278 cases of minor Myocarditis found in Israel with young men. This is out of 10s of million vaccinated.

Looking into it all, all cases were successfully treated with simple anti-inflammatory drugs and we have no clue if 278 young men had Myocarditis prior to the vaccine. It is not like they checked for it prior, so 278 our of millions is a very small number that could have had it prior. In any case it was found and easily treated, BUT holy hell did that generate an avalanche of posts here.

I could play this same scenario above over and over as these incidences are actually looked into past the hype generated, so yes the vaccine is very safe...

a reply to: Xtrozero

well then take your never ending boosters and dont complain when you get cancer.

we know its not safe. You're not convincing anyone. I know like 5 people that have died just after getting their vaccine.

Yes some of them had cancer but the vaccine exacerbated it to the point where they could no longer fight it off.

This is a war. and you are on the wrong side.

originally posted by: Xtrozero

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0

Did you just say the "vaccine" is "safer than any other one"?

What?

Yep,.... What?

It's literally the most dangerous vaccine in history and has killed more than every single other vaccine combined in the last 30 years. You're not convincing anyone of anything.

And what does bitchute have to do with anything? If I upload a video to youtube and the same video to bitchute what's the difference? Oh, right there is no difference, it's just a different hosting provider. Yet another fallacy.

a reply to: Xcalibur254

I strongly disagree with your claim that "all is well" regarding miscarriages and such from the shots.

I know one young woman who miscarried just a month after the shot. Yes, that is anecdotal.

Alex Berenson pointed out many months ago that in the few animal studies done by the manufacturers, of the pregnant rats who got the shot, all miscarried.

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0

Yeah and we are seeing the massive number of side effects and deaths.

It is interesting you say "we" and not "I". Who is we, the people that live on their confirmation biases?

There's plenty of whistle blowers and analysts that have calculated that it's killing more people than the virus. On top of that there is zero evidence it "reduces severity of symptoms." If a vaxxt person dies you can simply say it's rare, but if they survive, you can say it "reduced symptoms," but you have absolutely zero evidence. And don't try posting some fabricated CDC study, you're wasting your time.

There is just not that many, and the ones that try I have looked into a number of them and they are trying to push a buck in their doom porn. When I look at the two states I'm in, OR and WA , they have consistently been posting 90%+ unvacced in their hospitals this who year. I like to look more at the state level to avoid all the bias on both sides, so you can believe it or not...really don't care, but that is the reality of it all. On a personal level I have had a number of people unvacced and got COVID, they told me it was the worst illness in their life for 8+ days, and the ones that been vacced and got it were slightly sick for a few days, so once again you can believe the doom porn people or do your own independent research outside of social media.

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0

And what does bitchute have to do with anything? If I upload a video to youtube and the same video to bitchute what's the difference? Oh, right there is no difference, it's just a different hosting provider. Yet another fallacy.

Pick whatever social media you like to feed you confirmation biases, Youtube is as bad if not worst, but bitchute is where all the doom porn people seem to go to, so no fallacies here.

originally posted by: Salander

Alex Berenson pointed out many months ago that in the few animal studies done by the manufacturers, of the pregnant rats who got the shot, all miscarried.

Out of billions of people we would be talking 10s of millions of miscarriages, and countries like Israel that monitor everyone would have crazy numbers as proof, so were is that mass rate?

originally posted by: booyakasha

well then take your never ending boosters and dont complain when you get cancer.

we know its not safe. You're not convincing anyone. I know like 5 people that have died just after getting their vaccine.

Yes some of them had cancer but the vaccine exacerbated it to the point where they could no longer fight it off.

This is a war. and you are on the wrong side.

I never said I agree with the policies, or that I don't think big Pharma is out to make money off of this, so spare me the sarcasm. You want to make the vaccine the bogyman and the real bogyman is in the Whitehouse.

I also call total BS to your 5 people dying to it.

a reply to: Salander

Once again, 10-20% of pregnancies end in miscarriage in the 1st trimester. An estimated 25% (maybe more) of all pregnancies end in miscarriage.

Sadly it's not an uncommon occurrence.

originally posted by: majesticthirteen
a reply to: tanstaafl

First the virus didnt exist,

Only a tiny fraction ever made this claim.

then when that couldnt be ignored anymore antivaxxers started saying they needed fda approval.

Pure unadulterated BS.

Actual anti-vaxxers couldn't care less about FDA approval.

Fda approval comes and "fda is compromised".

FDA has been compromised almost since its inception. This is well known and easily provable byu the very fact of the absolutely proven and easily confirmed revolving door of its leadership and the Boards of Directors of all of the large pharma companies they are supposed to be regulating.

Trump comes out and says taking the vaccines is a good thing, "trump is compromised".

Either just purely ignorant, or part of the plan all along.

These people dont want truth. They want that natural dopamine hit they get by being indignant 24/7. Bless their hearts, i wish them the best.

Disingenuous much?

Note: that's a rhetorical question, the answer is blatantly oblivious.