FOIA docs reveal Pfizer shot caused avalanche of miscarriages, stillborn babies

We get all kinds of reports about the adverse effects of the jab (all anti-vax propaganda it is called by MSN and the brain washed) and this story is just one of several we have all read.

I would never get the vaccine if I were pregnant based upon the articles I have read. Now someone will come along and say but C-19 can not be good for the baby either.. Which I agree but once you look at some of the abnormalities of babies born to vaccinated mother with the Pfizer jab it would seem the answer is readily available; if pregnant say away from the jab.

Among the first reports handed over by Pfizer was a 'Cumulative Analysis of Post-authorization Adverse Event Reports' describing events reported to Pfizer up until February 2021.

Data Pfizer didn’t want you to see

When a group called Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency asked Pfizer to share the raw data from their COVID vaccine trials and post-marketing surveillance that was used to license the injection, the pharma giant linked up with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to refuse the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests. In fact, the FDA (meant to serve and protect public health) hired Justice Department lawyers and went to court to shield the pharmaceutical giant from having to reveal its data – for 55 years. That’s right. The FDA and Pfizer did not want anyone to see the numbers behind their COVID vaccine until 2076.

Fortunately, a judge ruled that the FDA and Pfizer would have to answer their FOIA requests. Among the first reports handed over by Pfizer was a “Cumulative Analysis of Post-authorization Adverse Event Reports” describing events reported to Pfizer up until February 2021. It reveals that the drug behemoth received more than 150,000 serious adverse event reports within three months of rolling out its COVID shot, but here we will focus on Table 6 of the data on pregnant and lactating women who received the shots in the first few months of the rollout, which began December 11. Most of these women would have been healthcare workers because that was who the first rounds of shots went to. As the clinical trials preceding the rollout excluded pregnant women, these would have been the first pregnant and lactating women to have ever received the vaccines.

Table 6 states that of 270 “unique pregnancies” that were exposed to the vaccine, “no outcome was provided for 238 pregnancies.”

This leaves 32 pregnancies with known outcomes.

Pfizer’s report states that there were 23 spontaneous abortions (miscarriages), two premature births with neonatal death, two spontaneous abortions with intrauterine death, one spontaneous abortion with neonatal death, and one pregnancy with “normal outcome.” That means that of 32 pregnancies with known outcome, 28 resulted in fetal death.

Pfizer’s report states that there were five pregnancies with “outcome pending” as well as the 238 with “no outcome provided.” But 32 minus 28 equals four, not five.

www.lifesitenews.com...

originally posted by: 727Sky

I would never get the vaccine if I were pregnant based upon the articles I have read. Now someone will come along and say but C-19 can not be good for the baby either....

The biggest problem with that↑ is that those aren't the only 2 options.

If you get the vaccine, then you are obviously guaranteed to have the vaccine in your body. Whereas if you don't get the vaccine, that does not mean that you are guaranteed to get Covid.

So option 3 would be: Baby gets neither vaccine nor Covid.

So the fact that option 2(Covid) might be bad, is not a good enough reason to go ahead and take option 1(Vaccine)

Pfizer has a history of paying off judges and producing drugs that are dangerous for pregnant women.

Example: www.reuters.com...

damn someone should sue the # out of them

oh wait

Here's the thing though, we have 238 pregnancies that we don't know the outcome to. If most of those produced health babies then the numbers are in line with what is expected.

About 10-20% of pregnancies end with a miscarriage in the first trimester. An additional 3% end in stillbirth or with serious complications.

So until you can provide all of the data it is impossible to make a judgment one way or the other.

a reply to: 727Sky

Avalanche of miscarriages!

Gross

a reply to: 727Sky

This is actually old date. I saw it months ago and I'm not even involved with vaccine trials. it was debunked pretty much instantly.

What the OP isn't saying is that the data shows nothing out of the ordinary. Yes, those women miscarried, but they miscarried at the most common time for a woman to have a miscarriage, and the rate of miscarriage was in line with what you'd expect for mothers at a time of high stress, such as a pandemic.

Or, to put it another way, the miscarriage rate for vaxxed mothers aligns almost exactly with unvaxxed mothers, and the women who miscarried did so a the most common time.

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
Here's the thing though, we have 238 pregnancies that we don't know the outcome to. If most of those produced health babies then the numbers are in line with what is expected.

About 10-20% of pregnancies end with a miscarriage in the first trimester. An additional 3% end in stillbirth or with serious complications.

So until you can provide all of the data it is impossible to make a judgment one way or the other.

This is actually old data that's been in the public domain for a while now. It shows that the women mostly miscarried at the most common time, and in line with pre-pandemic rates.

There's no evidence that the vaccine is linked to the miscarriages, and the rate at which the women miscarried is in line with miscarriage rates for women living under stress such as a pandemic.

a reply to: AaarghZombies

COVID-19 vaccines don't raise miscarriage risk, 3 studies show
www.cidrap.umn.edu...

U.S. EPA reaffirms that glyphosate does not cause cancer
mobile.reuters.com...

I guess glyphosate doesn’t cause cancer either.

Why do you keep $issuing on people and claim it’s rain….

a reply to: AaarghZombies

I guess people wouldn’t lie when billions are at stake, and guaranteed mandated market.

Justice Department Announces Largest Health Care Fraud Settlement in Its History

Pfizer to Pay $2.3 Billion for Fraudulent Marketing

WASHINGTON – American pharmaceutical giant Pfizer Inc. and its subsidiary Pharmacia & Upjohn Company Inc. (hereinafter together "Pfizer") have agreed to pay $2.3 billion, the largest health care fraud settlement in the history of the Department of Justice, to resolve criminal and civil liability arising from the illegal promotion of certain pharmaceutical products, the Justice Department announced today.

www.justice.gov...

to settle foreign bribery case
By Dina ElBoghdady
August 7, 2012
Pfizer Inc. agreed Tuesday to pay $60 million to settle charges alleging that some of its foreign subsidiaries bribed doctors and health-care officials in order to gain regulatory approval for the company’s drugs and boost sales in those countries.

www.washingtonpost.com... d_story.html

Your in the tank for Pfizer over people believing the vaccines shouldn’t be mandated, but an individual’s decision.

Your messed in the head.

a reply to: neutronflux

OK, let's unpack this. Firstly, you're using a well known tactic of the hard left. You're labelling me as pro-mandate in the hope that other people will read your comment and not bother to fact check you. Well, I can categorically say that while I'm pro-vax I'm anti-mandate. Because I think that people should be persuaded to take the vax through logical arguments and empirical facts.

Secondly, the the two cases that you raised are not only a decade old but are unrelated to the data posted by the OP.

Lastly, the data provided by the OP doesn't show what they claim it shows.

originally posted by: Ksihkehe
a reply to: AaarghZombies

I provided you the numbers showing that the vaccine was more dangerous then COVID for those under 18 and you proudly said you vaxxed your kids and said TLDR to my information.


[Removed by staff]

No, you posted some statistics that showed that only a small number of children world wide had been harmed by the vaccine, and that the risk form Covid was much higher. But you either didn't understand the data or purposefully misrepresented it.

Based on current statistics, the statistics that you thought were accurate when you posted them, about 500 children in the entire of the US will suffer a side effect significantly beyond mild flu like symptoms, and fewer than 50 will suffer serious side effect that could pose a danger to life.

a reply to: neutronflux

I will see your sources, and raise you a link to the NRA saying that "guns don't kill people, people kill people", and a bitchute video where they analyse how many times a minute Hilary Clinton blinks compared to various types of Iguana.

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
Here's the thing though, we have 238 pregnancies that we don't know the outcome to. If most of those produced health babies then the numbers are in line with what is expected.

About 10-20% of pregnancies end with a miscarriage in the first trimester. An additional 3% end in stillbirth or with serious complications.

So until you can provide all of the data it is impossible to make a judgment one way or the other.

The report is from Pfizer, what do you think the outcomes were?

I mean, surely they wouldn't hide the data of further negative outcomes, right?

originally posted by: carewemust
Pfizer has a history of paying off judges and producing drugs that are dangerous for pregnant women.

Example: www.reuters.com...

Yes, and Pfizer has twice pleaded guilty to medical fraud.

Only the most gullible amongst us believes a word that company says.

originally posted by: AaarghZombies
a reply to: neutronflux

OK, let's unpack this. Firstly, you're using a well known tactic of the hard left. You're labelling me as pro-mandate in the hope that other people will read your comment and not bother to fact check you. Well, I can categorically say that while I'm pro-vax I'm anti-mandate. Because I think that people should be persuaded to take the vax through logical arguments and empirical facts.

Secondly, the the two cases that you raised are not only a decade old but are unrelated to the data posted by the OP.

Lastly, the data provided by the OP doesn't show what they claim it shows.

Riddle me this how can you be pro vax and an anti vaxxer at the same time?

Because you are the definition of an anti vaxxer

Definition of anti-vaxxer
: a person who opposes the use of vaccines or regulations mandating vaccination
www.merriam-webster.com...

Pfizer is one of the most corrupted companies in the US and have a hold now on humanity with the crap covid jabs. This nazis use money to pay for everything in order to push the dangerous crap on humans with no regard for safety. Pfizer and their partner companies have hordes of lawyers on their call and also have plenty of corrupted judges to squash the opposition and complains, now in the US they have managed to get immunity from wrong doings, that means experimentation at will at the expenses of Americans.

Their motto of for the good of humanity is now for the good of their pockets.

They know this but money talks and bull crap walks.

a reply to: 727Sky

How do you FOIA a private company?

a reply to: 727Sky

"If pregnant, stay away from the jab?"

How about: EVERYBODY JUST STAY AWAY FROM THE JAB!