It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: dashen
a reply to: PilSungMtnMan
They would need the infrastructure for maintenance and upkeep.
Also. Nearly Every single device was accounted for.
Except the ones the crooked generals sold off for parts.
originally posted by: dashen
Ukrainian women reporting Russian troops are trying to pick them up on tinder
originally posted by: PioneerFigureSkating
So the big story I'm seeing today is that Russia may be targeting US biolabs in Ukraine. Apparently there are quite a few of them over there.
Here's an article about the labs. Russia has said it has no intention of occupying Ukraine. What they are currently doing is using precision weapons to target military targets. Could these labs be the targets? They're doing this to stop the "accidental leaks" of more bioweapons?
www.newsweek.com...
A Soviet military base in Ukraine was so secret that it was identified as a children’s camp on maps. That all changed on April 26, 1986, when the nearby Chernobyl nuclear reactor suffered a an explosion in reactor number four. The installation was immediately abandoned, and never used again. All that anyone knew about it before that was the mysterious radio signals known as the Woodpecker signal.
The purpose of the Russian Woodpecker remained a mystery. Conspiracy theories ranged from Soviet mind control to weather experiments. Then came the collapse of the Soviet Union, which revealed that the Russian Woodpecker was at the forefront of what is known as “over the horizon” radar, designed to provide early warning of an inter continental ballistic missile attack. The Duga-3 (Eastern) radar broadcasting the Woodpecker signal was located in the forests surrounding Chernobyl......
originally posted by: Justoneman
Why are you so critical of the proofs? You should concentrate on FAILURES instead.
I firmly believe the "proofs" of what was predicted impress me, but not enough for you apparently.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: FlyingFox
I just think the subject has already gotten more attention than it deserves...
And I think it hasn't. No one make you discuss this or reply to me, that's your call. I am discussing the findings with another poster who is obviously interested.