It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: PioneerFigureSkating
This past week, they've been citing over and over again individuals in the Biden Administration who say Russia is on the Precipice of invading Ukraine.
originally posted by: F2d5thCavv2
a reply to: PioneerFigureSkating
You may wish to look into the history of groups collectively called "Basmachi" by the Russians. A long history of Islam on Russia's southern border being restless. The two sides have not liked each other pretty much forever.
Was the "agency" in Kazakhstan? Possible, but not necessary for what transpired.
That one is a long game for the Turkic peoples in the region. I think some of their leaders dream of another Khanate stretching from Istanbul to Ulan Bator. Not that such ideas are popular in Beijing
Cheers
originally posted by: PioneerFigureSkating
originally posted by: Ghostsdogood
originally posted by: PioneerFigureSkating
a reply to: F2d5thCavv2
There's also the situation in Kazakhstan to consider. The Russians believe the CIA is behind that crap, and they're likely correct, imo. Between Ukraine and Kazakhstan, Russia's national security is being threatened on two fronts.
The question is, did Putin and Trump discuss all of this back when Putin tossed Trump that soccer ball and are the Russians playing along? I believe the answer to both is yes.
Time will tell.
I have also feared agency involvement, but honestly see no signs of it all.
And I've been looking.
fwiw.
Maybe they suddenly got a whole lot better at not being so obvious?
Seems unlikely, but I guess anything's possible.
Here ya go, check this thread.
mobile.twitter.com...
originally posted by: PioneerFigureSkating
a reply to: Ghostsdogood
Why? Because they're trying to pick a fight. And it isn't a question as to whether or not the NED is factually involved in Kazakhstan or not. They undoubtedly are.
www.ned.org...
From July 2021 to mid-January 2022, Hamalian and her Latitude Clinic have treated 1,092 covid patients.
For most of them, she prescribed the much-disparaged drug, ivermectin, and to all of them the treatment protocols of the much-disparaged doctors of the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance.
Her results would shame mainstream medicine: Only one of Hamalian’s patients died.
None was intubated.
None was put on a ventilator.
Only ten were hospitalized.
The one who died was a man of advanced age with multiple end-stage cormorbities.
New studies from the British Health Ministry suggests that COVID vaccines might interfere with the ability of our immune system to produce antibodies against other parts of the virus, crucial aspect for developing cross protection
Pfizer was wrong.
Science didn’t win. Biology won.
Our immune systems cleared out the anti-spike protein antibodies that the mRNA vaccines had forced them to make; and the vaccines did not produce the same long-term immunological improvements that natural infection and recovery from Covid cause.
Once the antibodies disappeared, the protection did too.
By July, new infections in Israel were soaring. By August, serious cases were soaring too. (The late summer 2021 spike is the fourth one on the top chart.)
The majority of the sick had been fully vaccinated - 60 percent as of mid-August. Yes, the unvaccinated still had a higher risk of becoming severely ill. But as I have written over and over, comparing death rates in unvaccinated elderly people in highly vaccinated countries to rates in the much larger group of vaccinated people is misleading. Many unvaccinated elderly people have not been vaccinated because they are too frail to tolerate a vaccine, and thus they are at high risk from Covid (or any illness).
The overall population-level numbers are what matter. Israeli health experts knew. “This is a very clear warning sign for the rest of the world,” one told Science magazine on August 15.
originally posted by: PioneerFigureSkating
a reply to: Ghostsdogood
We agree there is no interest there or in Ukraine. That's why I say they're trying to pick a fight. They wanted war with Russia back when Hillary was running. They still want war with Russia.
I view it as a rearranging of the deck chairs situation. War will distract from all the other disasters they are currently running in the wide open for everyone to see.
Again, there is no difference between NED and the CIA.
originally posted by: Ghostsdogood
originally posted by: PioneerFigureSkating
a reply to: Ghostsdogood
We agree there is no interest there or in Ukraine. That's why I say they're trying to pick a fight. They wanted war with Russia back when Hillary was running. They still want war with Russia.
I view it as a rearranging of the deck chairs situation. War will distract from all the other disasters they are currently running in the wide open for everyone to see.
Again, there is no difference between NED and the CIA.
I agree partly (maybe mostly) on NED.
Some obama agency types were involved in creating that crap, but it's usually pretty obvious when the agency itself is doing something with those groups.
Funding and training/tactics are two of the first signs, then comes advance media placement and international propaganda.
None of those signs are here in this case.
And we just have no interest there in the first place.
For as much as I hate what obama's colors did, they did at least try to limit themselves to non nuke states that had a long history of threatening us or our allies in some way.
This just doesn't even fit with what he was doing, and no way biden did something like this without obama pulling the strings.
Will be an interesting CT to watch for a while, but I just don't see anything worth pursuing yet.
originally posted by: PioneerFigureSkating
originally posted by: Ghostsdogood
originally posted by: PioneerFigureSkating
a reply to: Ghostsdogood
We agree there is no interest there or in Ukraine. That's why I say they're trying to pick a fight. They wanted war with Russia back when Hillary was running. They still want war with Russia.
I view it as a rearranging of the deck chairs situation. War will distract from all the other disasters they are currently running in the wide open for everyone to see.
Again, there is no difference between NED and the CIA.
I agree partly (maybe mostly) on NED.
Some obama agency types were involved in creating that crap, but it's usually pretty obvious when the agency itself is doing something with those groups.
Funding and training/tactics are two of the first signs, then comes advance media placement and international propaganda.
None of those signs are here in this case.
And we just have no interest there in the first place.
For as much as I hate what obama's colors did, they did at least try to limit themselves to non nuke states that had a long history of threatening us or our allies in some way.
This just doesn't even fit with what he was doing, and no way biden did something like this without obama pulling the strings.
Will be an interesting CT to watch for a while, but I just don't see anything worth pursuing yet.
😂
Nothing worth pursuing. 🤣
And what do you mean they aren't funding anything in Kazakhstan? You're not even reading the source material I provide.
“This wide-ranging grand jury subpoena suggests that Joe’s son and brother received transfers from an account with the Bank of China. The question that remains is why Bill Barr directly intervened to ensure that the U.S. Attorney in Delaware’s investigation into Joe’s family was kept from the public for over 17 months until after the election, as previous reporting has confirmed. David Weiss and Bill Barr—or someone with a conscience inside the Justice Department—should answer that question for the American people,”