Active Shooter Oxford Michigan High School

originally posted by: LSU2018
POST REMOVED BY STAFF

I'm not Left. But I'm not "fall off the cliff" Right either.

Re: Rittenhouse - my personal opinion is undecided.

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: LSU2018

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: shooterbrody
Good luck PROVING that.
The word KNOWING sinks the charge.
How does ANYONE know someone else will go ape#?

Oh, I don't know, maybe the homicidal drawings the kid's parents saw right before he went on a homicidal rampage.

The most likely scenario is that these parents created the monster and more than likely saw drawings like that all the time. The mom probably clasped her hands together and with a big smile, told him how good his drawings were, too ignorant to see the mental incapacities screaming out at the surface of it all. But then again, the kid had to get those mental issues from someone.

On the surface, I see similarities to the parenting of Rittenhouse.

Is there a fine line between terrorist and vigilante?

Laughable rhetoric.

originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: LSU2018
Once again, you and I agree. I know of many who had guns strictly for hunting which they taught the kids to do, kids who grew up on a farm so proud of the switchblade they got for their birthday. However these were responsible parents and made sure the kids were never handling the items willy nilly.

Not often we agree on anything, glad to see it here.

My parents HATE everything to do with firearms, but I have similar memories of them at least making an attempt (all you can realistically expect from parents of a teenager) to ensure safety training and supervision as needed with knives, power tools and chainsaws.

I grew up surrounded by hunters (other than my parents) and never witnessed any kids or parents even remotely similar in firearm safety negligence to what appears to have been the case in this family.

originally posted by: Ghostsdogood

originally posted by: shooterbrody

originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: shooterbrody

I'm not sure if you're a parent. As a parent, aware of previous violence at schools across the country, if my child has access to a gun I've bought him, has video on YouTube of blowing up home made explosives, I was informed he was looking up where to get ammo while in school, then the school shows me a picture he drew shooting people, tell me we have 48 hours to get him mental health, tell me to take him home, how could I possibly not know there could be a possibility of something bad happening?

I have to be a parent to understand the law?
Take your feelz elsewhere.

Prove the kid did not steal the gun.
It is really that simple.

No need.

They discovered the gun was missing when school called about homicidal drawings and not only refused to pick him up and seek help as the school suggested, but sent him a text telling the kid to stop being so obvious that he gets caught.

Negligence.

Enough to charge negligence anyway, not sure if enough for conviction.

Your described timeline us askew.
Perhaps you should review the "facts"?

originally posted by: shooterbrody

originally posted by: Ghostsdogood

originally posted by: shooterbrody

originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: shooterbrody

I'm not sure if you're a parent. As a parent, aware of previous violence at schools across the country, if my child has access to a gun I've bought him, has video on YouTube of blowing up home made explosives, I was informed he was looking up where to get ammo while in school, then the school shows me a picture he drew shooting people, tell me we have 48 hours to get him mental health, tell me to take him home, how could I possibly not know there could be a possibility of something bad happening?

I have to be a parent to understand the law?
Take your feelz elsewhere.

Prove the kid did not steal the gun.
It is really that simple.

No need.

They discovered the gun was missing when school called about homicidal drawings and not only refused to pick him up and seek help as the school suggested, but sent him a text telling the kid to stop being so obvious that he gets caught.

Negligence.

Enough to charge negligence anyway, not sure if enough for conviction.

Your described timeline us askew.
Perhaps you should review the "facts"?

I will when the dust settles and we have official information.

Due to democrat activities over the past 15 years i no longer believe a single word from msm and wait until my own eyes and ears are given a chance to see actual evidence.

Thank you democrats.

Your plan is working.

This timeline was the last one I read yesterday.

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

up until the parents ran,I would have said "No." now WTFK

This is NOT the Mud Pit!!!

All rules for POLITE debate will be enforced.
Community Announcement re: Decorum
Go after the ball not the player.


Reaffirming Our Desire For Productive Political Debate (REVISED)



You are responsible for your own posts.....those who ignore that responsibility will face mod actions.


and, as always:

Do NOT reply to this post!!

a reply to: LSU2018

I heard they were going to turn themselves in from their lawyers,so running might not be correct.

a reply to: shooterbrody

Even crapbags get due process here.

Is anyone suggesting the parents be denied due process? They are being charged... they will face a jury... that's called "due process."

We don't convict someone of something someone else did.

No, but we do convict people of what they do. If the parents were on trial for first degree murder (like the kid is, and as an adult I might add), then you would have a point and I would agree with you. They are not guilty of premeditated murder. There is nothing I have seen that tells me they intended for anyone to die. They may, however be guilty of negligence that assisted in the killing of another without intent to kill. That's involuntary manslaughter. And it's illegal.

You seem to be reacting based on emotion, not facts. There is nothing political here. 4 children are dead tonight, and 7 more are trying to recover from being shot. Their blood was all the same color: red.

TheRedneck

originally posted by: shooterbrody
Even crapbags get due process here.

Who, besides you and your strawman, said they weren't getting due process?

Its a HUGE leap from putting a handgun in a nightstand to providing one to a raving maniac intent on shooting up a school.

Yet they did it.

originally posted by: shooterbrody
As if you hadn't welched here previously.
Lol
No thanks.

Why not? You think you're correct, stand by your assertion, povera.

originally posted by: LSU2018
The most likely scenario is that these parents created the monster and more than likely saw drawings like that all the time.

I'm sure this POS didn't form his lunacy in a vacuum.

originally posted by: LSU2018
I don't think the Din Do Nuttin's are coming out for this one... Those parents definitely did sum'n.

No? Look at the winners debating with me. Dey dinnin do nuffin wrong, dey innocent.

originally posted by: JIMC5499
up until the parents ran,I would have said "No." now WTFK

One more time...DEY. DIDDIN. DO. NUFFIN. WRONG.

And due process something something.

originally posted by: TheRedneck
You seem to be reacting based on emotion, not facts.

I agree. Well said.

originally posted by: Ghostsdogood

originally posted by: shooterbrody

originally posted by: Ghostsdogood

originally posted by: shooterbrody

originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: shooterbrody

I'm not sure if you're a parent. As a parent, aware of previous violence at schools across the country, if my child has access to a gun I've bought him, has video on YouTube of blowing up home made explosives, I was informed he was looking up where to get ammo while in school, then the school shows me a picture he drew shooting people, tell me we have 48 hours to get him mental health, tell me to take him home, how could I possibly not know there could be a possibility of something bad happening?

I have to be a parent to understand the law?
Take your feelz elsewhere.

Prove the kid did not steal the gun.
It is really that simple.

No need.

They discovered the gun was missing when school called about homicidal drawings and not only refused to pick him up and seek help as the school suggested, but sent him a text telling the kid to stop being so obvious that he gets caught.

Negligence.

Enough to charge negligence anyway, not sure if enough for conviction.

Your described timeline us askew.
Perhaps you should review the "facts"?

I will when the dust settles and we have official information.

Due to democrat activities over the past 15 years i no longer believe a single word from msm and wait until my own eyes and ears are given a chance to see actual evidence.

Thank you democrats.

Your plan is working.

This timeline was the last one I read yesterday.

Lots of msm followers here.
Sadly.

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: shooterbrody
As if you hadn't welched here previously.
Lol
No thanks.

Why not? You think you're correct, stand by your assertion, povera.

Perhaps because parlays with welchers are folly?
Sadly your reputation preceded you.

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

Who, besides you and your strawman, said they weren't getting due process?

Lol
You
You said they are guilty
Lololololololol

a reply to: shooterbrody

Mom and Dad of the Year are going to prison and this is the sole reason for your reticence. If people stopped processing the situation emotionally and instead of factually it would be obvious.