The Ancient Egyptian Stones Were Perfectly Precise How is this Possible? Many Qs Little Answers

originally posted by: AlanBChrist
a reply to: Harte

Frist of all you are going on the total volume of the qurries you have forgotten the 5ft of space that surrounds every block pad so once again the volume thatcame out as in blocks is far less than you state if you do this to all the qurries what did YOU do with all that extra mateial

..and you are forgetting that the pyramids are not solid rock



They left a lot of room for fill at least 10%

originally posted by: AlanBChrist
a reply to: Harte

Frist of all you are going on the total volume of the qurries you have forgotten the 5ft of space that surrounds every block pad so once again the volume thatcame out as in blocks is far less than you state if you do this to all the qurries what did YOU do with all that extra mateial

Mind telling me what you're talking about here? Did I mention anything about quarry volumes?

You simply make statements without making any effort at being correct.
Where, exactly, did you get this "five feet" business?

All it takes is a moment's effort before you post, you know. If you think you know something, and don't know how you know it, then you don't know it.

So tell us. How many feet were between the blocks in this quarry (which you earlier claimed didn't exist)?



Harte

originally posted by: AlanBChrist
a reply to: Harte

And yet you did not explain how your method is correct but sense you have no
method to speak of you could never be right either so that makes complete redundency

Quote me saying ANY method is correct.
You don't actually read posts, do you.

Apparently, you felt the need to pretend that I didn't offer you an example of one of the handful of theorized construction methods that would have worked.
The link I gave you was based on evidence in hand. Actual, real, physical evidence that has been found at Giza and elsewhere.
What you're claiming is utterly unevidenced anywhere, except in your own fevered pea brain.

Harte

originally posted by: Hanslune

originally posted by: AlanBChrist
a reply to: Harte

Frist of all you are going on the total volume of the qurries you have forgotten the 5ft of space that surrounds every block pad so once again the volume thatcame out as in blocks is far less than you state if you do this to all the qurries what did YOU do with all that extra mateial

..and you are forgetting that the pyramids are not solid rock

They left a lot of room for fill at least 10%

The estimate is 500,000 tons of mortar in the GP alone.

Harte

originally posted by: Harte

They left a lot of room for fill at least 10%

The estimate is 500,000 tons of mortar in the GP alone.

Harte

Yep

a reply to: Hanslune

were you get all the dirt to make those magical bricks

Plateau ] Sand + limestone = no magical mud

We know your trying but try to keep up

a reply to: Hanslune

You didn't tell us what they did with all the extra matereial that came out of the quarry alone with the blocks
you can't becouse if you do you would be confirming what theDDC has already said
and that would mean that the DDC is correct . tell us how you are going to get rid of that much usless material
by not REDISTRIBUTING that material through out the area remember you can't make magic mud bricks out of them

I'm going to bet that your answer will have nothing to do with the question
run rabbit run

The DDC Logic at work

a reply to: AlanBChrist

This evening I used the DDC to find a book for you;
THE PYRAMIDS AND TEMPLES OF GIZEH

a reply to: Harte

The qurry has rows They were chiped away the same time as the block
if your block is 3ft by 31/2 foot that would make the sled that they are draging it out of the quarry with at leat 4ft So at 5ft you would have 6 inces or so on each side of the pathway now all you have to do is find the total volume of all those pathways to get the true volume of BLOCKS that came out of the qurries

at what point do you not understand that volume of waiste materal would be very close to the volume of blocks This would cut your quarry block volume in 1/2
so what did they do with the rest of the materiall that did not become blocks

ACK-ACK If this is to complicated for you to understand why say anything at all

The one the only DDC

originally posted by: AlanBChrist
a reply to: Harte

The qurry has rows They were chiped away the same time as the block
if your block is 3ft by 31/2 foot that would make the sled that they are draging it out of the quarry with at leat 4ft So at 5ft you would have 6 inces or so on each side of the pathway now all you have to do is find the total volume of all those pathways to get the true volume of BLOCKS that came out of the qurries

at what point do you not understand that volume of waiste materal would be very close to the volume of blocks This would cut your quarry block volume in 1/2
so what did they do with the rest of the materiall that did not become blocks

ACK-ACK If this is to complicated for you to understand why say anything at all

The one the only DDC

If you look at the picture of the quarry I handed you - you know, a quarry that YOU claimed no longer exists - you can see why anyone that isn't blind knows you are just making stuff up - grasping at straws.

I do, however, know what happened to the approximately 1% (not 50%) waste that came from quarrying operations.
Anyone that has spent much time studying findings made at Giza knows where it went.

In light of that, you asking that question is rather revealing, not that it revealed anything I didn't already know about you.

Harte

originally posted by: AlanBChrist
a reply to: Hanslune

were you get all the dirt to make those magical bricks

Plateau ] Sand + limestone = no magical mud

DDC doesn't exist until you link to it - successfully

Do try and keep up

So there is no mud in Egypt huh? That's your play? LOL

There is this magical watery thing called the NILE river a few hundred feet away from the pyramid, an entire western bank of the river covered with years layers of - wait for it -

MUD

factsanddetails.com...

i.imgur.com...

originally posted by: Mike27
a reply to: AlanBChrist

This evening I used the DDC to find a book for you;
THE PYRAMIDS AND TEMPLES OF GIZEH

Don't confuse him with reality.....

originally posted by: AlanBChrist

You didn't tell us what they did with all the extra matereial that came out of the quarry alone with the blocks
you can't becouse if you do you would be confirming what theDDC has already said
and that would mean that the DDC is correct

No link to the DDC, so dismissed

You mean the rubble? It was put back into the quarries after construction was finished and was there in the 19th century when it was cleared.

No link to the DDC means = nonsense

a reply to: Mike27

Thank You for the book
I know I've been given you guys alot of crap the last few days
But there is a reason
but I don't have time at this moment to explain
So disreguard any BS and hang tight

a reply to: Harte

Yes I have KNOWEN about those qurries that still remain for years they are old news
Those three quarries would not have enough volume to build the three pyramids so there must have been one or more qurries that they ether have not found or simply is not there any more .


By having a extra qurry would have made up for tha lack in volume from the other three

The reason for the 50% of volume reduction is the way they were quarryed

I explain,,.
If you are standing at ground level and you need a a block the size of a 3ft square
you would have to chip away the width of you tool in a square three feet down in a shape of a square,,
Now if your lucky
you could get it to crack free at the bottom
but you would still have to dig a path 3ft deepand 3ft wide to put on a sled to move the block out of the quarry
you have in other words quarryed two three foot blocks it is just that
The material that has been removed to make the negitive space for the pathway would be included in the total volume of the quarry but in reality would only yeild 1/2 the amount

Therefor the amount of 1% waste and the fact that you believed it is puzzling to say the least

Anyone that has spent much time studing the finding at GIZA knows were it whent I have not been there
so tell me where it went
In light of what,., are you for real,.,

a reply to: Mike27

I'm going to show you step by step what to type and compare it to what you typed

YOU TYPED A _ AFTER EVERY WORD LIKE THIS WORD_WORD_WORD_ ECT ECT
NOWHERE DID I SAY TO DO THAT

GO TO GOOGLE
ENTER THIS INTO THE SEARCH BOX
Dig Down Concept / Alan B Christ
then hit your spacebar one time
then type this
FileDCpage6.jpg
there are no spaces in the last part but maybe you need a little more help
so type it like this
File:
DDC
page6
.jpg
then hit enter
IF YOU STILL DON'T GET IT , I DON'T CARE

a reply to: Hanslune

First off I never said there was no mud There is lots of mud
but if you take the mud away and use the for bricks ,
what is going to hold back the water

Plus that would make the nile a very deep river
which it is not

The DDC is logic

a reply to: AlanBChrist
What a joke, you can't post a link and can't seem to understand that when one follows the instructions you give you get one hit to wikipedia that says file does not exist when you click on it. If you click on the images, which I guess are the two B&W line drawings to the left, they lead to the same dead end on wikipedia.