It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
IDK. It seems to me that I've shown to you that Trump's plan was to withdraw troops, before the civilians, because that's exactly what he actually did. It appears that his priorities drew down troop numbers, not civilian numbers, under his leadership. So, I think I've shown you that Trump's plan was to pull out troops before civilians. as you requested.
originally posted by: Alien Abduct
Can you show in Trump's plan where he wanted to pull out the troops before the citizens?
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: Nunyabizisit
Troop and civi levels from prior years have NOTHING to do with what joe just did
I disagree. Biden didn't inherit a blank slate.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: Alien Abduct
Can you show in Trump's plan where he wanted to pull out the troops before the citizens?
Can you show me in his plan where he didn't?
originally posted by: Nunyabizisit
Joe's plan was lost in the Whitehouse bushes somewhere.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: Nunyabizisit
Joe's plan was lost in the Whitehouse bushes somewhere.
We're talking about Trump's plan, try to pay attention.
We're talking about Trump's plan, try to pay attention.
apnews.com...
Stlll, Trump spoke cautiously about the deal’s prospects for success, warning of military firepower if “bad things happen.” Pompeo similarly said the U.S. was “realistic” and “restrained,” determined to avoid endless wars.
U.S. officials made clear at the time that the agreement was conditions-based and the failure of intra-Afghan peace talks to reach a negotiated settlement would have nullified the requirement to withdraw.
One day before the Doha deal, a top aide to chief U.S. negotiator Zalmay Khalilzad said the agreement was not irreversible, and “there is no obligation for the United States to withdraw troops if the Afghan parties are unable to reach agreement or if the Taliban show bad faith” during negotiations.
Those negotiations were intended to begin within a month of the deal being signed but were delayed amid disputes between the Taliban and the Afghan government over prisoner releases. Amid fits and starts, the negotiations had not produced any outcome by the time Biden announced his withdrawal decision in April. Nor have they done so since.
Miller said it was the “right approach” and necessary to force Ghani into negotiations. He said the Doha deal was always supposed to be “phase one” of the process, with the next part being the U.S. using its leverage to have Ghani negotiate on a power-sharing deal with the Taliban.
originally posted by: neutronflux
Are you sure?
Wat you did show me however is that Trump did leave enough troops to take care of business until the U.S. civilians could be evacuated.
And the Trump administration kept to the pact, reducing U.S. troop levels from about 13,000 to 2,500, even though the Taliban continued to attack Afghan government forces and welcomed al-Qaeda terrorists into the Taliban leadership.
April 15 — In response to Biden’s decision to delay full withdrawal until Sept. 11, the Taliban releases a statement that says failure to complete the withdrawal by May 1 “opens the way for [the Taliban] to take every necessary countermeasure, hence the American side will be held responsible for all future consequences.”
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: neutronflux
Are you sure?
Yeah, I'm positive what the other poster and I were discussing.
The Taliban had no negotiation power bubba. Do you really think we would need to negotiate with them?
And obviously biden didn't like Trump's plan to get the civilians out FIRST so biden left like 8,000 AMERICAN CITIZENS behind NOT TRUMP.
So you can take your lame ass blame game and shove it up your @**
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: Alien Abduct
The Taliban had no negotiation power bubba. Do you really think we would need to negotiate with them?
Weird. I wonder why Trump wanted to host the Taliban at Camp David for "talks"? I wonder how/why they got Trump to release 5,000 of their terrorist buddies from prison.
And obviously biden didn't like Trump's plan to get the civilians out FIRST so biden left like 8,000 AMERICAN CITIZENS behind NOT TRUMP.
How many did Trump get out, again?
So you can take your lame ass blame game and shove it up your @**
I don't know how you got "blame game" out of my post. There seems to plenty of it to go around.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: putnam6
Everybody learns at their own pace... more people than ever have that sentiment.
Sadly it's like The Tortoise and the Hare That Got Run Over By A Semi.
How many did Trump get out, again?
originally posted by: Alien Abduct
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: MykeNukem
There was no 'right plan'. Unless we intended on staying for more than one generation to let the Taliban breed itself out of existence while simultaneously getting a bunch of backwards tribal numpties to accept democracy this whole thing was doomed to failure from October 2001.
Even a 10 year old would understand that if you want to leave out of the country and leave it to an evil terrorist group, the first thing you do is make sure ALL of your citizens are out first! So there may not be a perfect plan but ANY plan with just a smidgen of logic would include this!
originally posted by: GravitySucks
There was never going to be any easy way out, no matter who did it or when or how, and the bitch of it all is that we both overreacted and knew this going in.
We could discuss this forever and get nowhere. We can point fingers, criticize, and armchair quarterback until we're blue in the face.
Or, we could have just patiently waited as each president pushed it along to the next, but what would that have bought anyone other than more political fodder and more money for the MIC?
A war on terrorism cannot target a particular country or countries. That's not how it works.
originally posted by: GravitySucks
a reply to: Nunyabizisit
From what I've seen the military is still operating in getting people out. Marines, Air Force, probably Army. I believe we're coming up on 40,000. And now private airlines are involved as well.
Ironically, this will mostly be old news in about a month or so, and people will have moved on to bitching about refugees.