It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Nunyabizisit
You don't know me. Do not make assumptions.
originally posted by: Nunyabizisit
Your leaders are under the impression that you are ok with their fascist ways.
Will you speak up?
Or defend?
originally posted by: Nunyabizisit
I was joking.
Guess I should have included a smiley face?
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Doctor Smith
See how you make stuff up?
Are you still working on the math?
originally posted by: Nunyabizisit
originally posted by: rounda
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: rounda
Yes I did, and do.
You wanted evidence of the "one report."
The OP was not able to provide it. We know that. But the OP then made a couple of claims of his own, which I countered.
More than 50 percent could be 80 percent.
The vaccinated are doing worse than the un-vaccinated.
The OP has not responded. Which is no surprise.
He doesn't have to respond to you. And it doesn't surprise me he hasn't. You're a dick.
If you want evidence of the "one report," go ask the doctor yourself.
I would also like to see the one report, if it exists.
Are you going to call me dirty names next time if I am the first to ask?
Well I would say it depends on how they do their statistics.
Compared to what? It was never claimed that the mRNA vaccines were 100% effective in any regard.
But if any significant amount are still getting the disease after vaccination, also proves mRNA vaxx isn't effective.
Prove it.
Plus the variants are being generated by the vaccines.
Prove it. I can just as easily claim that without the mitigation measures 2 million would have died in the US.
And almost zero would have died with proper early treatment.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Nunyabizisit
Ok.
I question the decisions of our leaders. Continually.
I even communicate with my representatives.
originally posted by: rounda
originally posted by: Nunyabizisit
originally posted by: rounda
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: rounda
Yes I did, and do.
You wanted evidence of the "one report."
The OP was not able to provide it. We know that. But the OP then made a couple of claims of his own, which I countered.
More than 50 percent could be 80 percent.
The vaccinated are doing worse than the un-vaccinated.
The OP has not responded. Which is no surprise.
He doesn't have to respond to you. And it doesn't surprise me he hasn't. You're a dick.
If you want evidence of the "one report," go ask the doctor yourself.
I would also like to see the one report, if it exists.
Are you going to call me dirty names next time if I am the first to ask?
Yep.
You can go ask the doctor yourself too.
Because apparently you, as well as your buddy, have an issue understanding the OP didn't make the claim, the doctor in the video did.
If you have a problem with the content of the video, take it up with the video creator, not the person sharing the video.
That's like watching a documentary on TV, and then you call the TV station and ask them to provide evidence for the documentary you just watched instead of contacting the people who actually made the documentary.
It's completely stupid.
originally posted by: Xtrozero
originally posted by: Nunyabizisit
I was joking.
Guess I should have included a smiley face?
Sorry...I'm quick reading at times cheers...
What more is required?
Because a statement like that, on its own, is quite meaningless. What was the sample? How many cases? How many of the people were vaccinated and how many were not?
originally posted by: Doctor Smith
a reply to: [post=26042197]Nunyabizisit[/post
They talked about it at 4 minutes into the video. Dr McCullough explained it. What more is required?
originally posted by: rounda
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: rounda
Yes I did, and do.
You wanted evidence of the "one report."
The OP was not able to provide it. We know that. But the OP then made a couple of claims of his own, which I countered.
More than 50 percent could be 80 percent.
The vaccinated are doing worse than the un-vaccinated.
The OP has not responded. Which is no surprise.
He doesn't have to respond to you. And it doesn't surprise me he hasn't. You're a dick.
If you want evidence of the "one report," go ask the doctor yourself.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Doctor Smith
"According to one report." I don't suppose you might happen to be able to provide that report?
Because a statement like that, on its own, is quite meaningless. What was the sample? How many cases? How many of the people were vaccinated and how many were not?
originally posted by: MykeNukem
originally posted by: rounda
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: rounda
Yes I did, and do.
You wanted evidence of the "one report."
The OP was not able to provide it. We know that. But the OP then made a couple of claims of his own, which I countered.
More than 50 percent could be 80 percent.
The vaccinated are doing worse than the un-vaccinated.
The OP has not responded. Which is no surprise.
He doesn't have to respond to you. And it doesn't surprise me he hasn't. You're a dick.
If you want evidence of the "one report," go ask the doctor yourself.
I have to disagree with your second line.
If we write an OP or make a claim, it's our responsibility to back that OP and/or claim up.
Especially when it's in the title.