It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: butcherguy
a reply to: carewemust
With Trump being out of office, its likely Brennan is safe from being exposed, because nothing was declassified that can implicate him. And of course, there will be no declas now, unless the Justices are made aware of something and demand the Intel or DOJ officials turn it over to them. (IF they have that power/authority)
My thought was that Trump shows evidence to the court that the election was rigged.
If that is shown, the proper remedy is to overturn the results of the election.
That would make Trump POTUS.
Then Brennan would have something to worry about.
originally posted by: doobydoll
originally posted by: butcherguy
a reply to: carewemust
With Trump being out of office, its likely Brennan is safe from being exposed, because nothing was declassified that can implicate him. And of course, there will be no declas now, unless the Justices are made aware of something and demand the Intel or DOJ officials turn it over to them. (IF they have that power/authority)
My thought was that Trump shows evidence to the court that the election was rigged.
If that is shown, the proper remedy is to overturn the results of the election.
That would make Trump POTUS.
Then Brennan would have something to worry about.
Trump's lawyers already proved yesterday at the impeachment thing that dems presented deliberately altered/doctored/faked evidence to a court . .. they exposed and proved as absolute fact and without any shadow of doubt that these people are prepared to destroy any person's chances of running for public office whom they don't approve of.
Proved that the people whom are at the top of America's political and justice system are corrupt criminals that are using their positions and taxpayer $millions to fake evidence in an attempt to prevent people from choosing their own president.
twitter.com...
Like the lawyer says, they didn't even deny what they did when confronted with the evidence.
It is a Truly serious crime with real evidence to prove it, should any legal entity with a spine decide to jump on it.
The acquittal also exposed the fake media - can you imagine the media feeding-frenzy if it was Trump's legal team that were caught having spent $$$taxes making up evidence, and spent/wasted millions more going thru with an actual impeachment that was built on that faked evidence?
Ironically, the ones that brought the impeachment, the accusers, were confronted with evidence of their own corruption.
Dems: shrugs.
Justice system: shrugs.
Media: tumbleweeds.
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi
In your opinion did Democrats in Congress and Media "experts" honestly feel/believe that Donald Trump would be convicted, at any point before or during the trial?
originally posted by: wdkirk
originally posted by: doobydoll
originally posted by: butcherguy
a reply to: carewemust
With Trump being out of office, its likely Brennan is safe from being exposed, because nothing was declassified that can implicate him. And of course, there will be no declas now, unless the Justices are made aware of something and demand the Intel or DOJ officials turn it over to them. (IF they have that power/authority)
My thought was that Trump shows evidence to the court that the election was rigged.
If that is shown, the proper remedy is to overturn the results of the election.
That would make Trump POTUS.
Then Brennan would have something to worry about.
Trump's lawyers already proved yesterday at the impeachment thing that dems presented deliberately altered/doctored/faked evidence to a court . .. they exposed and proved as absolute fact and without any shadow of doubt that these people are prepared to destroy any person's chances of running for public office whom they don't approve of.
Proved that the people whom are at the top of America's political and justice system are corrupt criminals that are using their positions and taxpayer $millions to fake evidence in an attempt to prevent people from choosing their own president.
twitter.com...
Like the lawyer says, they didn't even deny what they did when confronted with the evidence.
It is a Truly serious crime with real evidence to prove it, should any legal entity with a spine decide to jump on it.
The acquittal also exposed the fake media - can you imagine the media feeding-frenzy if it was Trump's legal team that were caught having spent $$$taxes making up evidence, and spent/wasted millions more going thru with an actual impeachment that was built on that faked evidence?
Ironically, the ones that brought the impeachment, the accusers, were confronted with evidence of their own corruption.
Dems: shrugs.
Justice system: shrugs.
Media: tumbleweeds.
The Democrat party is a corrupt entity. It’s sole purpose is to retain power. It cares little for the constituents who put it in power. It is going to steam roll everyone including it’s supporters.
It used a fake pandemic to gain power, it incited violence all summer in 2020 for political gain, it controls ALL media for political gain, it falsely accused a standing president for political gain, it has out right lied trying to control the narrative, they falsely support any movement such as the counter culture not because they care but for political gain.
They are the Party of Fascism. They are the party of hate. They are a gutted and rotted husk of their former greatness.
RINOs are Democrats in disguise.
Reap what you sow.
originally posted by: queenofswords
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: queenofswords
I had no idea an impeachment manager/prosecutor's son killed himself. I didn't watch any of the trial, but I heard one Prosecutor cried for no reason. Was this Jamie Raskin by chance?
Pelosi is responsible for many thousands of Covid-19 deaths. She is capable of doing anything, 100% remorse-free.
I came across that information about his son's suicide while looking up some info on Raskin's wife, a U.S. Deputy Secretary of Treasury under Barack Obama and a former member of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors. Biden was considering her for Secy. of Treasury in November.
So many suicides lately. When I saw that he had killed himself Dec. 31, it struck me as odd that Nancy Pelosi would assign the task of leader to Raskin just 13 days after a suicide death of his son.
I could find no details about the suicide other than he had been suffering from depression.
originally posted by: doobydoll
I also saw a cbsn news clip going round twatter where Trump's lawyer utterly destroys not only the female news presenter but the lying fake media too . .. (sorry peeps I don't know how to embed a video clip here from twatter) . ..
twitter.com...
originally posted by: queenofswords
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: queenofswords
I had no idea an impeachment manager/prosecutor's son killed himself. I didn't watch any of the trial, but I heard one Prosecutor cried for no reason. Was this Jamie Raskin by chance?
Pelosi is responsible for many thousands of Covid-19 deaths. She is capable of doing anything, 100% remorse-free.
I came across that information about his son's suicide while looking up some info on Raskin's wife, a U.S. Deputy Secretary of Treasury under Barack Obama and a former member of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors. Biden was considering her for Secy. of Treasury in November.
So many suicides lately. When I saw that he had killed himself Dec. 31, it struck me as odd that Nancy Pelosi would assign the task of leader to Raskin just 13 days after a suicide death of his son.
I could find no details about the suicide other than he had been suffering from depression.
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: brewtiger
Another Magnificent post BrewTiger!
What's most frustrating is President Trump knew all of this, but was powerless to have anything done about it. No declassifications, revelations, or indictments.
What can a 2024 President Trump do to make sure the blockades are removed quickly?
originally posted by: doobydoll
a reply to: EndtheMadnessNow
Hi ETMN.
I'm just watching a yt vid that Andrew Bustamante chap being interviewed a few weeks ago (27th Dec) . .. I've only just started watching so I'm unable to summarise . .. here it is tho for those interested . ..
www.youtube.com...
originally posted by: butcherguy
a reply to: doobydoll
When they heard the defense say that they were prepared to present 301 witnesses, they decided to have the vote.
I hope the Supreme Court accepts some of the election cases.
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: brewtiger
Another Magnificent post BrewTiger!
What's most frustrating is President Trump knew all of this, but was powerless to have anything done about it. No declassifications, revelations, or indictments.
What can a 2024 President Trump do to make sure the blockades are removed quickly?
originally posted by: MetalThunder
Regarding the subject of Suicide
Hey Canada ...
Stay ahead of the Narrative
...Developing ....
The media is actively promoting doctor assisted suicide