It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

-@TH3WH17ERABB17- -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART- - XXXV -

page: 284
169
<< 281  282  283    285  286  287 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 25 2021 @ 11:37 PM
link   
a reply to: BoomGiggle

Offloading containers on to the deck of an Aircraft carrier deck perhaps?

One would have to have a ship with a crane on board to move containers off the EVERGIVEN!

There's no cranes on the shore and I doubt you could put a crane tall enough to reach them on shifting sands?

What ships in the area would be roughly the same height with a crane on board and sufficient space to move a couple of hundred containers on to?

I'd say an Aircraft carrier is the only option?



posted on Mar, 25 2021 @ 11:44 PM
link   
Does his head shape look a little different somehow to you? These 2 screenshots are from same video and only seconds apart.
It was really pronounced at very beginning of video but I could catch it for a ss, but it really struck me right away.

It is from a Whiplash347 post today on Teleg at 2:53pm. I cant figure out how to link this one and it was a forward from another account that I cant find the video on at all.

ETA: Also note the bottom teeth for future ref.

The second picture on the right is shows the shape I mean better

edit on 3/25/21 by onehuman because: (no reason given)

edit on 3/26/21 by onehuman because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 25 2021 @ 11:46 PM
link   
a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

I just read somewhere in my travels just a wee bit ago, they were considering lifting them off with Helicopter Rel. Makes sense.



posted on Mar, 25 2021 @ 11:49 PM
link   
a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

I was thinking a Sky Crain Helicopter. Since the idea was to unload only enough to rise the bow up enough to free the ship.

Hey you may not be aware of this, but a "Sky Event" has happened. AS SEEN HERE, well at least readable here for now

The ISS passed overhead, and something big came through the atmosphere.
From: King 5 news

Astronomer Jonathan McDowell at the Center for Astrophysics said the lights are from the Falcon 9 Starlink launch reentering after 22 days in orbit.

McDowell said the streak "was observed from the Seattle area at about 0400 UTC Mar 26," which is 9 p.m. local time.

The Seattle office of the National Weather Service (NWS) agrees. NWS tweeted: "The widely reported bright objects in the sky were the debris from a Falcon 9 rocket 2nd stage that did not successfully have a deorbit burn."

NWS continued, "Based on the observed video, this looks more likely than a bolide meteor or similar object as they would be moving far faster on impact with our atmosphere. There are NO expected impacts on the ground in our region at this time. More info will be posted as it becomes available."


So was it the second stage of a rocket? One would think that if a rocket part was going to fall over populated land somebody might have made a statement about it before hand.
edit on 25-3-2021 by Guyfriday because: I'm stupid apparently



posted on Mar, 25 2021 @ 11:53 PM
link   
a reply to: onehuman

That would work onehuman - but only if the helicopters could remain stable enough to lift 1 container without knocking others off?

P.s. the Joe Bidan head shape reminds me of Jim Carey's head shape... wider at the top!



posted on Mar, 26 2021 @ 12:01 AM
link   
a reply to: Guyfriday

Guyfriday, I wonder if that was one of the Mossad MSM controlling satellites being taken out?



posted on Mar, 26 2021 @ 12:08 AM
link   
a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

The claim is that it was a rocket stage, but I was thinking something similar to you.

This also was being reported at nearly the same time. pnsn.org
A 2.1 earthquake was reported nearby in Canada.

So the ISS fly's over, a debris field from a "rocket stage" was seen, and an earthquake was registered all in the same area at the same time. Weird?



posted on Mar, 26 2021 @ 12:17 AM
link   
a reply to: Guyfriday

That is pretty weird when you read them all together like that. What are the odds of those three things occuring at the same time? Makes it one crazy fluke thats for sure.

As far as the Choppers go Rel, Im guessing they would let the Military boys lift them off. They have a lot of experience lifting heavy awkward things , lol and dropping them!

ETA: Not to mention it should be relatively calm, not like they are out on the swells of the sea with the cargo rolling around. Question is, will what we may be looking for be on a bow or the stern, or would they maybe be down in the hold?

edit on 3/26/21 by onehuman because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 26 2021 @ 12:23 AM
link   
a reply to: onehuman

I'd hazard a guess at both the "K" missile containers and trafficking - in which case you'ld want the missiles up top to protect the human cargo from being found?

ETA Julian'sRum is hinting that the EVERGIVEN stranding is to do with catching RED OCTOBER? I guess that would be a good reason for the Navys at each end of the canal?

This has got me thinking now... "Little Professor comes out brainstorming..."

How deep is the canal? Could a nuclear sub pass through it underwater?

If so, could it turn around in the canal if it's way ahead were blocked by EVERGIVEN?

If you're Red October, then how do you defend yourself if you' can't turn your sub and the only thing your torpedoes can fire at is a container ship?

edit on 26-3-2021 by RelSciHistItSufi because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 26 2021 @ 12:33 AM
link   

originally posted by: PioneerFigureSkating
a reply to: onehuman

They're blaming it on a "blackout." Like I said though, it seems to beggar belief that it could happen randomly at all. The vessel barely even fits inside the canal and it is turned completely perpendicular to the canal itself. Crazy.

At any rate, I think it's going to be stuck there awhile. Like I said, the bow of the ship is literally dug into the shore. They are trying to use tugboats to tear it loose, but it's hard to even imagine how much that thing weighs, and with it run aground, they're basically trying to pull the full weight of that loaded vessel.


Helicopters to remove the cargo to lighten the load. Hard to believe this is not on purpose. These pilots make some mistakes but how many times have we seen or heard of one blocking the Suez sideways. Either on purpose or the worst ship Cpt and Pilot since shipping began moving thru the canal.
edit on 26-3-2021 by Justoneman because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 26 2021 @ 12:36 AM
link   

originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
a reply to: onehuman

I'd hazard a guess at both the "K" missile containers and trafficking - in which case you'ld want the missiles up top to protect the human cargo from being found?


I agree, but finding missiles arent going to jar the populace as much as finding kids sad to say. It will rattle some, but we need the masses and children found in cargo boxes would do that.
Plus again, are they on the bow? Something would have t obe found to warrent a full search of the ship. Finding K missiles would probably do that.

If this has all be planned which it is appearing to be more by the hour, then I would think they will know right where to look. Thats comforting at least. Fiugre how long they expected to be at sea with the kids, they have to come in under that same time frame to not lose any waiting to get this show on the road and getting done. I dont think "weeks" are going to work, not for Live cargo



posted on Mar, 26 2021 @ 12:39 AM
link   

originally posted by: PurpleFox
So they start unloading containers and find children/people?


And the whole world reports it? Maybe we here in the US would get the white washed/redacted version of the story to keep us in the dark in our news on the children's plight. That would be one hell of a boom if it got thru to the people in America. So many are not wanting to wrap their heads around the child trafficking it is appalling.

edit on 26-3-2021 by Justoneman because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 26 2021 @ 12:42 AM
link   

originally posted by: F2d5thCavv2
From the Whiplash feed.



Cheers

That ship looks in distress and the cargo is missing. WTH happened to the cargo?



posted on Mar, 26 2021 @ 12:45 AM
link   
Rel? Didnt you post something just a few ago about two Navy Ships crashing or to look for it?

Israel for Last? Israel Tried to Sink a US NAVY SHIP


Israeli forces attacked the USS Liberty, killing 34 American servicemen and injuring at least 174. This is one of the most decorated crews in US history, yet the media have buried and misrepresented the attack, and the crew is still awaiting justice. (Documentaries below)



On this day 53 years ago, Israeli forces tried to sink a US Navy ship, the USS Liberty. The prolonged Israeli attack killed 34 men and injured at least 174. The Moorer Commission declared: “…in attacking the USS Liberty, Israel committed acts of murder against American servicemen and an act of war against the United States.”


Note, where it says on this day, was actually meaning the day the article was posted in June 2020



posted on Mar, 26 2021 @ 12:58 AM
link   
a reply to: onehuman

I read that article as saying it was payback time for what occurred 53 years ago?

Off for some zeds now
edit on 26-3-2021 by RelSciHistItSufi because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 26 2021 @ 01:28 AM
link   
Ever Given Grounding: The Latest from the Ship Manager



A team of expert salvors from Smit Salvage (Dutch) have been appointed and are now at the vessel, with salvage operations being coordinated by the Suez Canal Authority, according to BSM.



“The focus now is on dredging to remove sand and mud from around the port side of the vessel’s bow. In addition to the dredgers already on site a specialised suction dredger is now with the vessel and will shortly begin work. This dredger can shift 2,000 cubic meters of material every hour,” the company informs.

528,344 US gallons / 2,000,000 liters.



posted on Mar, 26 2021 @ 01:41 AM
link   

originally posted by: pteridine

originally posted by: Justoneman
Not what i am talking about. I am saying no building of this design to my knowledge ever collapsed before this one or since this one in history due to fire. That is one hell of a record. All that other stuff is fluff compared to that fact. Yes, you are probably correct in your assessment of the news. But no way should that happen due to flames from fuel. The Chemistry does not match the temperature if it did. I have a CRC: Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, bible of the such within one foot of me right now every day. I can tell you that fuel has combustion rates significantly than that is needed to bend steel. And the rivets popping would not allow a free fall straight into the building foot print. The OS is a lie.


Let’s take your points one by one.
"I am saying no building of this design to my knowledge ever collapsed before this one or since this one in history due to fire." This is true simply because this building is a one-off. There is no other building of this design. It had a cantilevered section over a power substation. As I remember, the main beams of the cantilever were 50 feet long but you can look that up.
“But no way should that happen due to flames from fuel.” This was not burning fuel it was burning contents of the offices. No aircraft struck this building. The damage to this building was from falling parts of the WTC towers. The temperature of the fire was estimated at 1100 F, which is common for house fires containing normal combustibles.
Look in your CRC handbook at the table Commercial Metals and Alloys, Miscellaneous Properties in section D (this is on D-184 in my newest copy; look it up under Expansion, coefficient of linear, metals and alloys in section I) and it shows mild steel has an expansion coefficient of 6.7 x 10^-6 inches per inch per degree F. 50 feet is 600 inches. 600 inches x 6.7 x 10^-6 x 1100 and the beam will lengthen by 4.4” which would be enough to shear the fasteners.
“I can tell you that fuel has combustion rates significantly (less) than that is needed to bend steel.” Now look at Temperature and Strength of Metals (engineeringtoolbox.com) and note that at 1100 F, steel has about 30% of its strength at 70 F. Consider the load on the damaged structure and do the calculations for deflection and failure. My bet is that you will find that the steel may not hold up very well under load after losing 70% of its strength.
“And the rivets popping would not allow a free fall straight into the building foot print.”
The building did not free fall. The center collapsed first and then the rest collapsed seconds later.

FO sure, this is all part of the same situation with the Cabal criminals and their games they play. 9-11 being on the list.

But here is a big fact:
Steel to be hot enough to be slightly red is 1100 F. At 2000 F the steel will run like magma as it did days later at the Twin Towers hole. SO just where did your extra fuel come from to get it up to those temperatures?

I think it impossible without other things like maybe thermite. Planes don't have anything in them that is more intense combustion temperatures. Where did the extra come from?

Heat chart for Blacksmithing



posted on Mar, 26 2021 @ 03:20 AM
link   
Starting to wonder if this Cargo Ship was copy/pasted into the landscape.

Waiting for a giant hand to reach down and move it.

How will it all end? Will the sky roll up and scroll the Credits of actors for all to see?

🤣



posted on Mar, 26 2021 @ 03:32 AM
link   

GhostEzra

And God said, "Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters." And God made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament: and it was so. And God called the firmament Heaven. And the evening and the morning were the second day (Genesis 1:6-8).

GhostEzra

"It is he who sits above the circle of the earth, and its inhabitants are like grasshoppers; who stretches out the heavens like a curtain, and spreads them like a tent to dwell in;" Isaiah 40:22 ESV

GhostEzra

General rule of thumb, everything they taught you in school, it's just the opposite.

t.me...
Yes Buzz you too ☝️☝️

Why did Trump slash NASA's budget? Think logically.



UN logo
t.me...


The surrounding wheat looking images are ice.☝️☝️

Treaty for Antarctica off limits. www.ats.aq...




GhostEzra

Who's ready for Cern now?😂😂

15.0K views 00:42


GhostEzra

In a nutshell, Cern was an attempt to reverse engineer creation. It didn't work out so well. The things that happened because of it were from another dimension. CERN IS finished. This video was from a few years ago. Great video. www.youtube.com...



Scientist and the Elite Try to Hide What Really Happened at CERN, Demonic Entities, Extra Dimensions

Scientist are beginning to get more and more "religious". What has happened at CERN the past few Years? And What are they up to, this will not be your typica...



edit on 26-3-2021 by PillarOfFire because: (no reason given)

edit on 26-3-2021 by PillarOfFire because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 26 2021 @ 03:33 AM
link   
Curiouser and Curiouser, Secret Service Attempted to Cover For Hunter Biden Handgun Thrown in Trash Can


POST 2084
- Contains a repost of 2067 (but strangely shows a "2066")
- Message: rearrange [word brackets] to spell DECLAS ([D-1], [E-2], [C-3]... [S-6])
- Errors aren't random... maybe a hint to convert numbers to letters [2-E][6-S]?
- 2-0-6-6 could read as "E-O-S-S" (if 0=O)
- If SS = Secret Service, then 2066 reads "Executive Order - Secret Service"


GOP Overseers Investigate Trump's Use of the Secret Service
- In Sept 2018, SS asking lawmakers again to lift OT pay for agents
- POTUS already signed a bill earlier in the year raising the pay limit
- This approved bill allowed agents to receive OT pay retroactively for 2017
- Rep request = detailed list of all individuals protected by SS since Pres Reagan
- List extends to Congressmen, Foreign Dignitaries in US, individuals by EO...
- They never thought she would lose = indirectly shows who went where & why.


Who is the Secret Service authorized to protect?


What Is It Like To Be An Agent Of The U.S. Secret Service?


Understanding the Plan vs Guessing the Plan vs Trusting the Plan
Finding calm by not viewing narrative in terms of "good or bad"
Continue to pray for all.




top topics



 
169
<< 281  282  283    285  286  287 >>

log in

join