-@TH3WH17ERABB17- -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART- - XXXV -

a reply to: crankyoldman

It makes a good cover though. It's one of those shirking responsibility thing corporations are great at, just ignore the money flowing both ways between them and government, that's just freedom in action yo. Lobbying is a first amendment right. Freedom of speech and all that. Now shut the # up unless you agree with us. Why yes...we may be the defacto internet public sphere that's directly funded by governments that grant us a monopoly due to the afore mentioned lobbying...

No biggie...go start your own platform...oh what...we own the majority of hosting, dns servers, the stores that a huge percentage of device owbers are locked into, over 50% of the entire infrastructure of the internet....

Well go start your own internet...

Oh you want some grants or subsidies....??

Ummm....yeah....no....good luck though. You can do it lil guy. Just believe...also...we own the patents on everything...and if we even so much as have a hint you're infringing on our patents we will # you so hard with court fees you don't even...

Yes...we know we infringe on patents all the time and take advantage of open source initiatives by building closed platforms around them...

Again...

Go make a few billion dollars then you can do this too...oh right...we control the market and the banks too....hmmm...

Well you could just learn to submit and obey your masters?

IMPORTANT: Using Content From Other Websites on ATS
Posting work written by others

originally posted by: dug88
a reply to: crankyoldman

Go make a few billion dollars then you can do this too...oh right...we control the market and the banks too....hmmm...

Well you could just learn to submit and obey your masters?

That's a big one. So idiot drones cheer when DJT's bank removes him because something something social justice. Yet they scream, yell and sh$# post if they themselves are tossed for being overdrawn too much.

It is funny how darpagoog, darpasoft and these awful systems are somehow seen as a bootstrap "you can do it to" examples. I had someone once say to me she was bummed she wasn't as well known or as successful as Martha Stewart or Oprah. I didn't know where to begin.

originally posted by: blueman12

originally posted by: All Seeing Eye

originally posted by: blueman12
a reply to: BlissSeeker

China wants us to wake up.. but meanwhile they put people in detention camps that rape and torture them. They ban free speech and erase history.

How the hell does china care about American citizens if the freedom of their own citizens is worthless?

Just as in the US. the people are good and honorable. They have lived the horrors of political party's, and secret societies who take control of their government. Same as what is happening here...

What??? China is still under communist rule.

I don't know one way or another, but I'm willing to bet KU speaks Mandarin...

IMPORTANT: Using Content From Other Websites on ATS
Posting work written by others

IMPORTANT: Using Content From Other Websites on ATS
Posting work written by others

IMPORTANT: Using Content From Other Websites on ATS
Posting work written by others

a reply to: blueman12

Probably a lot we don't know about Chinese access to the internet.
The latest Microsoft news seems to suggest Chinese hackers possibly operating computer hardware with 2 NM scale Hafnium Oxide enhanced chipsets were able to gain access to US think tank servers.
So maybe there is an open international network that the US public has not been told about?

originally posted by: Bordon81
a reply to: blueman12

Probably a lot we don't know about Chinese access to the internet.

So maybe there is an open international network that the US public has not been told about?

Search member bobs_ur_uncle here. He found that critical information from the US was routed through China, by design, as in, China was not only in the loop but was part of the loop. Many of the digs here and during the process showed that China is the network of the US, not by hacking but by design - bathroom server and all.

a reply to: carewemust

Fine, but leave the cell phone in the car.

IMPORTANT: Using Content From Other Websites on ATS
Posting work written by others

originally posted by: FlyingFox
a reply to: carewemust

Fine, but leave the cell phone in the car.

What argument is there FOR taking a phone/tracking/monitoring device to an "insurrection?"

DC is, when the President is there, the most highly monitored place on earth. Every call is monitored for like 3 miles or around or something, ALL of them.

Sooooo, they took phones but not guns? To an insurrection? Take over the government for good with no guns but a phone with apps?

Why didn't folks think of this when Amin, Penochet, Mao were in charge?

a reply to: sussy

Welcome to your view - mine is under my control.

My sense is that your sense is just sentiment - but when has a man ever had control over a woman's sentiment?

a reply to: daskakik

Being of the opinion that the judgment mentioned by Q isn't coming is not the same as fearing it. Personally, it wouldn't even be directed at me so I have no reason to fear it, even if it does come about.

👍
What biblical actually means depends upon the interpretation of those contemplating it on one hand and what is actually occurring on the other.

Your grounding in flighty perspectives act as an appreciated anchor, so I ain't hating on ya.

If something happens that blows everyone's eyes wide open, you saw it here and even poked your finger in some holes before it took place.

originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
a reply to: sussy

Welcome to your view - mine is under my control.

My sense is that your sense is just sentiment - but when has a man ever had control over a woman's sentiment?

Sly

originally posted by: PillarOfFire

Boris Johnson and Allegra Mostyn-Owen, Sultans Ball, 1986.

Photos From the Last Days of the Old, Decadent Oxford

Boris Johnson’s university girlfriend and later wife

a reply to: crankyoldman

Sooooo, they took phones but not guns? To an insurrection? Take over the government for good with no guns but a phone with apps?

That's my biggest problem with the insurrection storyline...note i watched it live while it was happening. The media portrayal of it is kind boggling...is that if it really were a 'right wing insurrection' they would still be there now in the capitol and likely the white house. The kind of people actively trying to institute an insurrection that would fall under the right wing are likely about as armed as any cop or light military personel. They practice in militia's, they're ex military, police etc. They know how to shoot, they own lots of guns...

This is all going by how the media portrays such people...but there are actually many such people..

If those people were there trying to take over the capitol, they would have succeeded and probably many more people would have died.

That was not an insurrection by any stretch of the imagionation. I can't even begin to understand how it's been spun that way...

Again, i watched the whole #ing thing live. That was barely even a #ing protest let alone an insurrection.

originally posted by: dug88
a reply to: crankyoldman

Sooooo, they took phones but not guns? To an insurrection? Take over the government for good with no guns but a phone with apps?

That's my biggest problem with the insurrection storyline...note i watched it live while it was happening. The media portrayal of it is kind boggling...is that if it really were a 'right wing insurrection' they would still be there now in the capitol and likely the white house. The kind of people actively trying to institute an insurrection that would fall under the right wing are likely about as armed as any cop or light military personel. They practice in militia's, they're ex military, police etc. They know how to shoot, they own lots of guns...

This is all going by how the media portrays such people...but there are actually many such people..

If those people were there trying to take over the capitol, they would have succeeded and probably many more people would have died.

That was not an insurrection by any stretch of the imagionation. I can't even begin to understand how it's been spun that way...

Again, i watched the whole #ing thing live. That was barely even a #ing protest let alone an insurrection.

Agree. Isn't it really the pinnacle of Orwellian speak? When is an insurrection an insurrection? When the eneMedia says so!

As EMN has posted the capital has been BOMBED, recentlyish. Men have actually DIED. This was a guy in a viking costume escorted in by the capital police to take selfies in the main room - literally!!! Suddenly that's a violent coup??? Orwell and the like would have said, "nah, that's a bridge too far."

Insurrection used to mean, guns, tanks, demands, plans, and an army.

Nothing has meaning anymore, or at least agreed upon meaning. I recently had a showdown (FlyingFox would have LOVED my verbal assault) with some idiots and I was just STUNNED at how effing stupid these professionals were. They didn't even know their own systems, which left me finding some out of left field way to attack and win. Nuts.

I crave the halcyon days of 2019 - a lot.

Well, I would suppose, yes, this realty we are living in is a manufactured reality made to benefit a very few. And in the bigger picture it is all maya. However, you are the one who made the leap to Qanon being the one truth, those words were NEVER typed by these fingers and are sooooo far from my thinking. God is the ONE truth.

With Tavistock and Laurel Canyon, the CIA, and others, directed the creation of movies, "literature," news media, music and every other type of communications to form, control, reduce the intelligence of the mind of Americans, Europeans, South Americans, Central Americans, etc, etc. Sure, grassroots efforts come up, indi music, films, art. The artists and their works are bought up and merged with the slimmy river of sticky, sweet tooth rotting garbage pumped out by the Media/Entertainment Complex.

Open internet does not equate any magnificence. Countries and leadership are judge by housing, food, healthcare, the well-being of their citizens, the quality of infrastructure and, in the end, quality of life. The internet adds little to quality of life.

originally posted by: blueman12
a reply to: BlissSeeker

So you're saying all world news is a lie and orchestrated. But the one truth is a unknown person or group posing as Qanon.

You do realize how wack that sounds right?

You and others here are sounding very cultish. Im all for questioning reality but you are trying to shift reality around one person/group - Q.

Go and talk to chinese people. They will tell you how the internet is limited in china. That gives evidence, without any media, that the chinese do supress their people.

Meanwhile, internet in America is very open.