-@TH3WH17ERABB17- -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART- - XXXV -

Technically it is pronounced "koo-yoo." Probably not a coincidence.

originally posted by: steaming

Watched DJT Jr. Video earlier in which DJT.Jr. Wore a Grey T shirt. Upon the front - in large letters - read;

KUIU

KU Made me wonder .............. 'Q' ........... ?

www.facebook.com...

originally posted by: PokeyJoe
a reply to: F2d5thCavv2

Yeah, but what do I have to do with it? Why me? And why change my name to “Pokey Joke?” Just very weird, and a little disconcerting all around….

I wonder if it has any connection to the 'Spooky Friend' that used to visit here?

originally posted by: EndtheMadnessNow
a reply to: underpass61

Tiger was listening to...

OMGosh - sorry to derail, but I was an army specialist stationed at Fort Leavenworth in 1986 and a few of us drove to Kansas City to see "Van Hagar" in concert. If this was filmed in Kansas City - I was there and it was awesome! Never did see Sammy Hagar as a solo concert, but I did catch the David Lee Roth version of Van Halen a couple of times in Seattle - I believe in 1978 and again in 1980. Good times, but it only helps to remind me how old I am.

Looks like Ghost Ezra may follow ATS...
gab.com...

www.abovetopsecret.com...

a reply to: PokeyJoe
Why would you take offense to a reasonable question? You're making an argument that the Epstein scandal is bunk. I just find it odd that you would come to that conclusion because the basic premise that connects pretty much all these other related conspiracies is that there is a secret cabal of world leaders who are also child/human traffickers for blackmail & profit (& worship). For you to think that Epstein isn't a central figure in that world is kind of amazing because it would mean that you're ignoring hours worth of digs and information posted on these very threads that point directly to his guilt. You can participate if you want, I'm not your arbiter lol. But if it was me and I didn't believe these theories were legit then I wouldn't waste my time & energy here, anymore. So thats why I asked. It was out of curiosity. To each his own...

Disinfo to distract from March 4th?

electionwiz.com...

a reply to: cherokeetroy

All I said was the Epstein is dead. If you have some evidence to the contrary, please provide it. The only evidence we have that hes NOT dead, are some blurry photos of his ears.

The real conspiracy with Epstein is whether he killed himself or was murdered.

Also, just because I feel he is actually dead, doesn't mean I don't think there is a pedophile cabal that runs the world - because I do. They are 2 completely different issues.

More on body doubles. Here's a link to a video side by side comparison of Biden when he's speaking. The differences in his face are apparent

Maybe he got a really good face lift

a reply to: PokeyJoe
You also said there's no tapes but ok 👌

a reply to: cherokeetroy

I said "maybe" there are no tapes. I said "maybe" much of what we hear about Epstein and his actions are an urban legend built up around his fake persona. Nobody knows how he supposedly made all his money. What I'm trying to get at is that perhaps he is nothing but an Intelligence Asset with a very well rehearsed, fleshed out back story?

A joint venture between Mossad and the CIA.

Im NOT saying there are no tapes. I just think its interesting that none of these tapes (of which there has to be thousands) have leaked, been found, been released, whatever. Even his right hand woman, Maxwell, has no idea where they are. Doesn't that say something to you?

Nice ring you got there, Richard.

Anyone watching this clown show?

Note: It also looks like Richard, is wearing a purple, NWO allegiance shirt.

a reply to: PokeyJoe
Did you see the tweet I posted in my response to you yesterday from Virginia Guiffre? She said there are tapes and she's seen the stills. She's one of Epstein's victims

twitter.com...

a reply to: steaming

Interesting find steaming.

I came up with the idea of "KU" instead of "Q" on this thread, so if it's a deliberate choice by Jr. to wear it then he has been reading this thread?

Interesting that Salman's name is being mentioned today. He was brought up in one of Storm Rider's tweets

Hold Mohammed Bin Salman Accountable For His Crimes

The Biden administration will be releasing a declassified version of the intelligence report on Jamal Khashoggi’s murder on Thursday. The report identifies the Saudi crown prince Mohammed bin Salman as the one ultimately responsible for the grisly killing:

A declassified version of a U.S. intelligence report expected to be released on Thursday finds that Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman approved the 2018 killing of journalist Jamal Khashoggi, four U.S. officials familiar with the matter said.

source

Since Biden is releasing this report, I'm sure it's to somehow tie the murder to Trump

a reply to: tommyjo

I didn't "miss" the Republican congress peeps clip - I just didn't comment at the time but since you asked:

a) Initially I wondered why the presser was done in darkness after an afternoon meeting but I see from the schedule that the 2 hour meeting was at 17:00 and that sunset was at 19:01,

b) There is snow on the bushes - it snowed up to noon on Jan 31st... so could be residual remaining 31 hours later,

c) Again, no White House staff visible, especially at the open door at the end. Nobody visible at any of the windows either and all curtains drawn (there would at least be shadows if the rooms were occupied). The place gives off an air of being empty bar those at the presser,

d) The positioning of the event is new to what I've seen before of pressers at the White House. What happened to the journalist being on chairs six feet apart and a good 15 foot from those at the podium?

e) The journalists look disinterested... busy typing on phones, eyes down or with arms crossed, rather than actively engaged,

e) I would note that this was all republicans, where's the similar footage after ANY democrat meetings with their "President"? In the 10 days from Jan 21st to Feb 1st were there no significant Democrat meetings at the WH worthy of a press conference? You'ld thinking they'd be flooding the media with such, to demonstrate Democrats in charge at the WH!!

originally posted by: Fowlerstoad
a reply to: cimmerius

Hey ... I will own that comment, because I was the MD.

I didn't say to take tylenol and alcohol at the same time ... because yeah, that will burn out your liver potentially pretty fast.

... don't take alcohol and tylenol together. EVER.
)

edited

Thank you. That was an important clarification.

So many “official” government or corporate sources can’t necessarily be trusted right now. People look to the internet for information and suggestions on what to do.

But that has it’s own risks.
.

This was probably covered years back in this thread but I think worth revisiting. It's astonishing to see NBC on the attack in this story and also note that WH press secretary Jen Psaki was running point for Hillary.

originally posted by: F2d5thCavv2

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: crankyoldman

IMO

The guy in red is holding up a Trump cutout of someone who looks like President Trump. (Smile isn't broad like the real DJT's smile)

The guy in red and the Trump facsimile are standing in front of a large blown-up photo of the National golf course.

You may be correct. The "Trump" in that image seems to be illuminated differently than the dude in red. Something off about that photo.

Cheers

Dude is red is Jack Nicklaus. If memory would serve me a bit better, IIRC there was a DJT twit pic of TIger, Jack and DJT after golf in 2018? Was the odd DJT double/Jack pic posted in relation to the Tiger incident?

Worth noting. Folk here and around question why attack Tiger? The answer to that is really complex and not straightforward. In this case he's a well known enough figure that it proves a distraction. Folks think they "know" him so the "oh Tiger get well" stuff shows up, in the same way with Kobe. The "outpouring" over Kobe was bizarre.

Symbols are weird that way, not necessarily logical.

a reply to: crankyoldman

Thanks Cranky. I would have never recognized Nicklaus; my image of many of the famous people of previous decades is how they looked then vice their current appearance.

Symbols are weird that way, not necessarily logical.

Absolutely. They speak to the heart and not the mind.

Cheers