It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: TzarChasm
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: Boadicea
That's why we need questions and answers from individuals under oath to tell the truth. The many whistle-blowers signed sworn, legally binding affidavits. I hope the officials testifying are "sworn in" before answering questions.
I hope when the investigation is finished and the allegations are dismissed, you will have the dignity to admit there's no actual proof of fraud.
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Boadicea
Hopefully we get clarity on that specific situation.
Sunshine is good for everyone.
The image is of all the files that have been UNDELETED.
That shows it was recovered by the forensic IT teams. It’s not to show us that they were deleted it is to show that they HAVE IT ALL.
originally posted by: TzarChasm
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: Boadicea
That's why we need questions and answers from individuals under oath to tell the truth. The many whistle-blowers signed sworn, legally binding affidavits. I hope the officials testifying are "sworn in" before answering questions.
I hope when the investigation is finished and the allegations are dismissed, you will have the dignity to admit there's no actual proof of fraud.
originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: Boadicea
As far as I understand, data on digital devices can't be simply "deleted" the can be overwritten by new data however.
Just before January 6th, an Italian lawyer named Alfio D’Urso, in a signed statement, alleged that Arturo D’Elia, an Italian programming prodigy whose work experience includes the U.S. Air Force’s Office of Special Investigations and NATO, confessed to an election cyber-attack using military encryption. In D’Urso’s video statement, he states that D’Elia’s involvement in the cyber-attack is known by a “security services official.” To date, these allegations have been difficult to corroborate as D’Elia was arrested in December 2020 and is currently behind held in Salerno under house arrest. Equally curious is the time frame of the alleged crime, which is from 2015-2017. Maria Zack, who originally broke the story, stated that the arrest of D’Elia for a crime he apparently committed three years earlier was to keep him from fleeing the country and testifying about the cyber-attack.
originally posted by: TzarChasm
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: Boadicea
That's why we need questions and answers from individuals under oath to tell the truth. The many whistle-blowers signed sworn, legally binding affidavits. I hope the officials testifying are "sworn in" before answering questions.
I hope when the investigation is finished and the allegations are dismissed, you will have the dignity to admit there's no actual proof of fraud.
originally posted by: carewemust
originally posted by: TzarChasm
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: Boadicea
That's why we need questions and answers from individuals under oath to tell the truth. The many whistle-blowers signed sworn, legally binding affidavits. I hope the officials testifying are "sworn in" before answering questions.
I hope when the investigation is finished and the allegations are dismissed, you will have the dignity to admit there's no actual proof of fraud.
Too late!
The Main Stream Media is already acknowledging that fraud did occur. But there wasn't enough to make a difference.
Moving their own goalposts, like small-minded losers always do.
originally posted by: Guiltyguitarist
a reply to: Irishhaf
Exactly. Bury him. Put an end to this controversy. But they won’t. Almost as if they can’t.
PS. They got the deleted files. Has anyone here acknowledged that?
originally posted by: shooterbrody
originally posted by: carewemust
originally posted by: TzarChasm
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: Boadicea
That's why we need questions and answers from individuals under oath to tell the truth. The many whistle-blowers signed sworn, legally binding affidavits. I hope the officials testifying are "sworn in" before answering questions.
I hope when the investigation is finished and the allegations are dismissed, you will have the dignity to admit there's no actual proof of fraud.
Too late!
The Main Stream Media is already acknowledging that fraud did occur. But there wasn't enough to make a difference.
Moving their own goalposts, like small-minded losers always do.
Which main stream media is acknowledging fraud?
TIA!