Finally! Forensic Election Audit in Maricopa County (AZ) Begins Next Week

originally posted by: xuenchen
What IF . . . .


Extra ballots were printed by the contractors (bribes and payoffs) and never reported in the original work order reports ??

If there were extra ballots printed by the contractor, Runbeck, then that would explain the truckloads of "extra" ballots that Runbeck kept bringing into the tabulation center every day of the week following Election Day....

This is fun! Give us some more!!!

originally posted by: Boadicea

originally posted by: xuenchen
What IF . . . . .

Counterfeit ballots have been detected by ID'ing the paper and ink and comparing to ballot printer contractors specs and whaaaala !! What if MSM suppressing is in progress 😎

Hmmmm... okay.... I wanna play too!

If there were in fact counterfeit ballots inserted into the genuine ballots, then perhaps the whole story about ballots printed in China and bamboo fibers in the paper were the crazy half-cocked disinfo put out to be easily proven false... and simultaneously discredit the truth about actual counterfeit ballots NOT printed in China on Chinese paper inserted in with the genuine ballots...

Uninformed people will only hear "counterfeit" or "fake" ballots and not pay attention to the details. But the devil is always in the details...

Like the tactic that introduces bazar stories that make people automatically dismiss all theories and even facts. 😎

originally posted by: Boadicea
a reply to: Arnie123
ETA: I'm thinking Zuckerburg's money has something to do with this. Like the $3 million Zuck bucks that Maricopa County received... and immediately vanished.

Twitter's CEO (Jack Dorsey) sent over $300 million to various swing-state election officials, prior to November 2020.

originally posted by: Boadicea

originally posted by: carewemust
ATS might get a Michigan Forensic Audit thread in a week or two.

That would be a beautiful thing to see!

The more audits the better. The more elections we can confirm as legitimate or not, the better. The more the critters get it through their heads that we do have a right to know our elections are fair and honest, the better.

I'm wondering if we don't need routine forensic audits every so often... just to keep everyone honest. We could even make them surprise audits. Random audits. Here one year, there the next year, over yonder the year after that. Yup. I'm liking that idea.

IL Gov Rod Blagojevich was released from prison last year. He said the 2020 election setup was a Democrat's wet dream, due to how much reliance they place on cheating, during every election cycle.

He helped the Trump White House identify the schemes being perpetrated in key swing-states prior to Nov 2020.

Trump called them out. Republicans ignored him. Democrats called him foolish.

If the Arizona forensic audit shows large scale cheating/fraud, and the courts continue ignoring the evidence, it will be time for those who want to make America honest, to retake/reclaim our country.

a reply to: carewemust

Twitter's CEO (Jack Dorsey) sent over $300 million to various swing-state election officials, prior to November 2020.

Thank you -- I thought I remembered hearing about that, but I haven't had a chance to track it down, and thought I might be confusing it with the Zuck bucks.

So we've got Zuck Bucks and Dorsey Dollars...

a reply to: carewemust

He helped the Trump White House identify the schemes being perpetrated in key swing-states prior to Nov 2020.

Too bad Trump didn't create his own election fraud organization to identify and fight all the cheating in court. I'm sure they could have found a way to make official complaints stick, if they'd tried soon enough and hard enough.

Alas. Woulda coulda shoulda...

Antrim, Michigan hearing being livestreamed right now:

The video should still be available when it's over.

What IF . . . . .

The scanners that check signatures were all set to minimum selectivity and 80% of rejections were tabbed as "OK"?

Then what about all the signatures getting mixed away with the ballots inside the signature envelopes and become un-auditable (especially all those new universal non-absentee ballots mailed to all names and addresses on the voter rolls even if the address doesn't exist anymore or the voter no longer lives there, or the voter is deceased) ?😎

originally posted by: xuenchen
What IF . . . . .

The scanners that check signatures were all set to minimum selectivity and 80% of rejections were tabbed as "OK"?

Hmmmm... okay... What if they didn't realize they needed to do so soon enough, and had to change it mid-process... then it would explain why the hearing witness saw someone processing "highly questionable" ballots before a power-down of the machines, and then "highly likely" immediately after the power-up again...

Then what about all the signatures getting mixed away with the ballots inside the signature envelopes and become un-auditable (especially all those new universal non-absentee ballots mailed to all names and addresses on the voter rolls even if the address doesn't exist anymore or the voter no longer lives there, or the voter is deceased) ?😎

Well, darn, you lost me there! That went right over my head!!!

More from the witness who stated Dominion employees were running the election:

“They Sent Everyone Home – Rebooted the System on Election Day” – Arizona Elections Witness Jan Bryant Joins Steve Bannon to Talk About Maricopa County Election

There is a video at the link, but it's on Rumble, and I don't know how to embed Rumble videos. But here's a partial transcript of the pertinent part:

So one of the things that made me the most nervous early was on Election Day, we had a full room people -- volunteers and employees -- there doing the tabulation and the adjudication, and at 3:00 they rebooted the servers and no one would tell us why. And sent everyone home. Um and so on Election Day, you wouldn't think that would happen. Um and the employees didn't seem to know what was happening. Dominion employees just called it and said, "Hey, go home. We're gonna have to reboot."

It's the bolded part (bolded by me) that I find most disturbing.

That sure sounds like Dominion calling all the shots and running the election to me. It also sounds like that's when they first realized... something... something that needed to be changed or otherwise addressed...

a reply to: Boadicea
Wow
That is distressing!
Had ANYONE made the election officials leave, it is shady.

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Boadicea
Wow
That is distressing!
Had ANYONE made the election officials leave, it is shady.

Yes!!! Thank you!

We are basically finding out that our election officials and employees were taking their marching orders from Dominion.

Not cool. Not legal. Not acceptable. Not in any way, shape or form.

a reply to: Boadicea
That doesn't sound compliant with the State of Arizona election laws.

Is that how Arizona operates Annee?

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Boadicea
That doesn't sound compliant with the State of Arizona election laws.

Indeed NOT. And what is especially maddening about it is that they have used the same laws they violated to say that the audit is not secure, or even not legal. Breaking chain of custody of ballots, access to ballots by non-County/State employees, access to election equipment passwords (which apparently includes access to private citizen data, as well as law enforcement data), and so on and so forth.

Is that how Arizona operates Annee?

Not to speak for anyone but myself, but I appreciate polite and reasoned opposition in the discussion. And especially from someone else in Arizona. We need that. We don't have to agree, but 1 -- it keeps us honest, 2 - it prompts us to up our own game and addressing arguments with facts and reason (knowledge is power!), and 3 -- if we're ever going to get past the divide-and-conquer mentality, we have to be able to find middle ground, and that requires us to understand the opposition.

This whole debacle -- with the Maricopa County Republicans fighting the Republican Senate as much and as hard as the Democrats -- shows us that neither party is innocent. It can't just be here in Arizona. It's pretty much the same thing in Georgia. And look at the spectacle Liz Cheney is making of herself. She's covering her own ass -- I'd bet on it.

And remember, one of the "best" arguments of the Dems is that "Look, even Republicans think it's crazy. You're all just sore losers." This also conveniently separates the "good" Never Trumper Republicans from the "bad" Trumper Republicans.

I expect the craziness is just beginning to ramp up, as we get closer and closer to a final report. And it's going to come from both the Dems and the dirty Pubs.

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Boadicea
That doesn't sound compliant with the State of Arizona election laws.

Is that how Arizona operates Annee?

On break — personal — avoiding feisty energy — cuz of my grandson (13 high functioning autism).

Anyway, I’m not gonna take anyone’s word for anything just cuz they say something.

Facts? They’re damn sketchy in this entire thing.

Until there’s an official declaration — everything’s an opinion.

a reply to: Annee

..except for the traceable unique fibers in the paper !!!

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: Annee

..except for the traceable unique fibers in the paper !!!

Maybe — maybe not.

No official report.

originally posted by: Boadicea

originally posted by: AngryCymraeg
a reply to: carewemust

Those who bother to listen to the embarrassing nonsense coming from this story know exactly what's going on. They are inspecting the ballots for traces of bamboo. Yes, you heard that right. They are checking to make sure that some of the ballots weren't printed in China, checked off to indicate Biden votes, brought to the USA and then somehow dumped en masse in the county.

And in the end, it's not a matter for a judge. At least not a judge in a court of law. More like 350 million judges in the court of public opinion.

That is a very insightful comment. Thank you for saying it.

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: TrulyColorBlind

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Byrd

originally posted by: Boadicea
a reply to: Annee

Fact... because it is possible... but -- obviously -- arguable.

First, the Feds would have to establish Constitutional supremacy over each State's legislative bodies to set policy and procedure for elections..

And you might want to stop and consider this point.

We elected a President -- in charge of the Federal government. That's what the Federal government role is here and since the election is for a Federal office (not state) the Feds do have the constitutional supremacy here. States have to set things up within Federal guidelines (in other words, the governor of the state can't simply appoint people.)

It seemed pretty clear to me.

I’m trying to stay with legal process.

Not “feelz” — slinging Right/Left barbs.

Being a resident of AZ I know it’s 1/3, 1/3, 1/3, with Independents swinging the vote. And there was a massive “Blue” push campaign resulting in a significant increase of Native/Latino votes. Plus, as you said, many just wanted Trump gone.

Because of this, I think the election was/is legit.

It concerns me that they’re determined to find something, even if nothings there.

Of course they're trying to find something. It's called "The Truth." But your friends the Democrats keep trying to block every move that's made to find the truth seven ways from Sunday.

And the Reps would be doing exactly the same if reversed.

First, read your comment that I'm responding to. You made a claim about Republicans and said they would be doing the same thing.

Second, my response to your comment is this: Please provide proof of your statement, proven in a court of law, or it is a false statement. At least fault in the way that precendent has been set for claims of election fraud.

Anything other than you providing proof of your statement will be deflection at the least.

a reply to: Boadicea

To the best of my knowledge, the only data that router store is their own settings and connection logs. Those connection logs are nothing more than a list showing that at said time, device with stated MAC address or internal IP address connected to stated outside IP address, amount of data transferred, and whether or not there were any errors. The size of these logs is usually limited to a certain amount, based on the size of the on board flash memory. A router doesn't store actual copies of the data transferred.