Finally! Forensic Election Audit in Maricopa County (AZ) Begins Next Week

originally posted by: Boadicea
But there are still plenty that do recognize that if an election can be stolen from their candidate this time, it can happen next time and the time after that and so on and so forth.

But what if the results say it wasn't stolen like the four times in Georgia? At what point does it stop being pathological?

originally posted by: shooterbrody
But no audit

But there is, your hypothetical scenario is hypothetical, the reality is there's an audit and that Trump and company petitioned the Arizona Senate President for one sine November.

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: Nunyabizisit
Surely you aren't trying you claim that you just learned about this through an email?

Once again, since you seem to be missing it, this audit isn't about transparency, this is about Trump claiming he lost and looking for sympathetic fools to throw him a life line.

Yes, I understand that is what democrats want everyone to believe.

The fact that many do not agree with them seems to cause a desperate panic.

And that desperation causes you to repeat the same baseless arguement in hopes that I will stop responding to your absurd claims.

And that appears to frustrate you even more.

So you attempt to regurgitate the same thing.

And here we are.



But all this does make current democrat tactics and lack of basis for their arguments even more transparent to others.

So keep going if you want.

Would be nice if you at least tried to regurgitate one of the other absurd claims from democrats though, this one is boring.


Maybe tell us about the russia hoax again?

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: Boadicea
But there are still plenty that do recognize that if an election can be stolen from their candidate this time, it can happen next time and the time after that and so on and so forth.

But what if the results say it wasn't stolen like the four times in Georgia? At what point does it stop being pathological?

Georgia conducted an audit then?

Of course not.

You are just making things up again.

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: Butterfinger
Assuming they arent incredibly open about it anyway. Non-issue

They weren't open about it, which is why it showed up via FOIA.

Sure, sure.

Audit should be canceled because of FOIA.


Woildn't that mean that nearly every government operation should be cancelled?

Since they have also responded to FOIA requests?



Your arguement is absurd.

And pretty pathetic.

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: Boadicea
But there are still plenty that do recognize that if an election can be stolen from their candidate this time, it can happen next time and the time after that and so on and so forth.

But what if the results say it wasn't stolen like the four times in Georgia? At what point does it stop being pathological?

is a recount and forensic audit the same?

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: shooterbrody
But no audit

But there is, your hypothetical scenario is hypothetical, the reality is there's an audit and that Trump and company petitioned the Arizona Senate President for one sine November.

So back to audit being a fraud because Trump also wants one?

Do you not realize how absurd that is?

originally posted by: Nunyabizisit
So back to audit being a fraud because Trump also wants one?

I didn't say it was a fraud, I said it was a waste and it shows the true reason for it. How many more times you need this repeated?

originally posted by: network dude
is a recount and forensic audit the same?

Will the results be any different? I already know the answer.

What’s Happening In Arizona Is Not Really An Audit Or A Recount. It’s A Partisan Inquisition.

Audits and recounts are an essential part of our voting system, but what’s happening in Arizona isn’t. The state Senate that ordered the process is calling it an audit, and all the ballots are being recounted, but it’s not really an audit or a recount — it’s a partisan inquisition. Conducted by a company founded by an election-fraud conspiracy theorist and Trump supporter, the process is funded mostly by Trump loyalists and fails to meet any of the standards required for official recounts or audits by state law. The process indulges the fantasies of the most extreme political fringe while ignoring the fact that there is zero evidence of any election fraud to warrant such intense scrutiny.

The result will almost certainly not be the greater transparency Republican state senators claim they seek. The review — and others like it — may instead further erode trust in our elections.

fivethirtyeight.com...

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: Nunyabizisit
So back to audit being a fraud because Trump also wants one?

I didn't day it was a fraud, I said it was a waste and it shows the true reason for it. How many more times you need this repeated?

So nobody should be allowed an audit.

Because you think Republicans in Arizona are wasting their resources?

Do you honestly not see your fascist ways?

Somebody performing a forensic audit of election results sure does bring out the stupid.

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: network dude
is a recount and forensic audit the same?

Will the results be any different? I already know the answer.

how could you know this?

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: network dude
is a recount and forensic audit the same?

Will the results be any different? I already know the answer.

Do both look at the ballots?

Of course you already know the answer to that as well.

Is the reason for the desperate panic to smear AZ Audit and prevent other states from doing the same.



Are democrats afraid of what audit might show?

Or just fascists enraged because some people refuse to automatically accept their 'truth' as fact?

Why else fight so hard against checking to see if the ballots match the results?

originally posted by: Nunyabizisit
So nobody should be allowed an audit.

Did I say it shouldn't be allowed? I said, once again, that it's pointless and it isn't the altruistic affair that it's being positioned to be by the proponents. It's solely because Trump lost and can't accept it so his sycophants, both out in Arizona and here in this thread also can't accept reality.

originally posted by: Nunyabizisit

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: Nunyabizisit
So back to audit being a fraud because Trump also wants one?

I didn't day it was a fraud, I said it was a waste and it shows the true reason for it. How many more times you need this repeated?

Because you think Republicans in Arizona are wasting their resources?

The Independents swing AZ - not the Republicans.

The independents in AZ take being independent seriously.

They are the reason Trump lost.

originally posted by: network dude
how could you know this?

Because I don't have a dog in this race and can look at all the other similar scenarios where fraud was claimed this election and compare the f*** all they found in those to the same thing they'll find in this one.

originally posted by: Annee

Thank you for sharing that again.

It is still the opinion of a bunch of leftist 'journalists', on behalf of the democrat party.



The AZ Court disagrees.

Even after dems dirty trick to force judge change.


But is obviously easier for brainwashed democrats to to believe these democrat activists at 538 than a court of law.

And of course fascists being fascists, you are upset that everyone won't just take your word for the election results.

Or the activists at 538 either.

And that goes for stone cutters as well.

Only a forensic audit will do.

You know, where they count the actual ballots present.

Why is this so controversial?


Are democrats afraid of what audit might show?

Or just fascists enraged because some people refuse to automatically accept their 'truth' as fact?

Why else fight so hard against checking to see if the ballots match the results?

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: Nunyabizisit
So nobody should be allowed an audit.

Did I say it shouldn't be allowed? I said, once again, that it's pointless and it isn't the altruistic affair that it's being positioned to be by the proponents. It's solely because Trump lost and can't accept it so his sycophants, both out in Arizona and here in this thread also can't accept reality.

Such rage.

Are democrats afraid of what audit might show?

Or just fascists enraged because some people refuse to automatically accept their 'truth' as fact?

Why else fight so hard against checking to see if the ballots match the results?

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: shooterbrody
But no audit

But there is, your hypothetical scenario is hypothetical, the reality is there's an audit and that Trump and company petitioned the Arizona Senate President for one sine November.

Lol
No, and not even a nice try.
The state senate is responsible for the audit. No one else has that legislative power.
Your spin is weak sauce.
Your distain for transparency is disgusting.

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: Nunyabizisit
So nobody should be allowed an audit.

Did I say it shouldn't be allowed? I said, once again, that it's pointless and it isn't the altruistic affair that it's being positioned to be by the proponents. It's solely because Trump lost and can't accept it so his sycophants, both out in Arizona and here in this thread also can't accept reality.

Absolutely!