It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: CoramDeo
a reply to: Thoughtful1
Ignore the red circles.
I wonder if her protection is hand-picked.
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: EndtheMadnessNow
"Disinformation is necessary" -Q
originally posted by: pteridine
originally posted by: Justoneman
originally posted by: pteridine
originally posted by: Justoneman
You forget we can borrow the extra energy for the 2H2O add energy = 2H2+O2 eqaution.
Use the two H2 molecule for combustion the one O2 molecule gladly accepts/takes back up the pair of H2 atoms under combustion that was split in step one to obtain the H2.
Add solar energy that doesn't cost much and there you go plenty of energy to get the H2. Store that solar energy in a car battery Then provided you have compression when the engine turns over, turn on the ignition which sucks in the H2 gas similarly to long chain hydrocarbon fuels. Then, produce the spark in the cylinder with timing and off you go. Since the sun is free energy we got this solved in spades.
originally posted by: FlyingFox
originally posted by: PokeyJoe
a reply to: angelchemuel
Seriously. They have engines that run on nothing but water. EVERYTHING is a lie or a scam.
Water? Where does the energy overage come from? Splitting hydrogen and oxygen from water is an endothermic reaction, combining it to make water is exothermic, but that means starting with free oxygen and hydrogen.
I guess the "engineers" assume that a certain amount of water "gives" you so much hydrogen and oxygen if it's "converted" or something.....then you can burn it again It's up there with perpetual motion machines.
en.wikipedia.org...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perpetual_motion
Ignoring the thermodynamics lands this stuff in the bin below junior-high physics, and it's just not a good look.
wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_law_of_thermodynamics
en.wikipedia.org...
The Second Law of Thermodynamics says that processes that involve the transfer or conversion of heat energy are irreversible. ... It states that as energy is transferred or transformed, more and more of it is wasted.
You are invoking solar energy. Electrolysis of water and storage of hydrogen by compression is inefficient. If you have enough energy to do that, why not just put the solar power on the grid or into batteries/ultracapacitors and come out much further ahead?
The energy density of wind and solar is so poor that the land area requirement is 400 to 500 time that of a conventional power plant of the same output. If you are worried about CO2, develop modern nuclear power plants and not just oversized submarine power plants. Think HTGR.
Say what you want it works. They used to have one experiment doing said cracking of water at the Boston Museum of Science. I and my EPA buddies ate dinner one night there on an EPA event 25 years ago that Scientists in my field were invited to participate. One of the reasons they wanted us to go the Museum and have a private field trip was so that we could see the introduction of the ideas and using solar panels, storing the daytime sun on a battery they were able to crack and store H2 from water 24 hours a day was one of them. They were very proud of the idea at the time.
Of course it works. You are charging a battery with solar cells. Once the battery is charged, you can do whatever you want with it. Ask Tesla about the concept. This is a grade school science project and their idea has been around for many more decades than that.
Sunline Transportation in CA was running buses on H2. They had a big solar array and an electrolysis cell to show how they were making H2. I went out back and saw bottle racks and a tube trailer. They were buying the hydrogen to run the buses because they couldn't make enough hydrogen to run a go kart. The hydrogen was made by reforming methane.
The hydrofanatics were generally clueless on production, storage, transport, properties, and efficiency of use. When I told them about the amount of energy needed to liquefy hydrogen and the ortho-para problems, they were astounded. What they lacked in knowledge they made up for in zeal. I did provide some education and a few caught on but I think zeal won the day.
originally posted by: IAMTAT
E...again...
Scratch previous posts.
I just talked with the Boss for the first time in a long time after attempting to resign my post.
Full Speed Ahead.
Stand at the ready.
Every lie will be revealed.
gab.com...
CNN is making no mistake about it: It wants to censor and close Newsmax from broadcasting as a cable news channel. Apparently jolted by the fact Newsmax has skyrocketed to become the 4th highest-rated cable news channel in the country, the liberal CNN is decrying what it calls Newsmax's "election denialism" and is seeking to have it "deplatformed" from cable and satellite systems across the nation. Oliver Darcy, CNN's leftwing media critic, has been demanding cable operators drop Newsmax, which is currently carried by every major system in the nation. Newsmax is also streamed free by most OTT platforms and devices. In a CNN column in early January, Darcy falsely claimed conservative media caused the protests at the Capitol on Jan. 6. "After all, it was the very lies that Fox, Newsmax, and OAN spread that helped prime President Trump's supporters into not believing the truth: That he lost an honest and fair election," Darcy wrote. Darcy's demands have been echoed on CNN's shows, including their Sunday media show "Reliable Sources" hosted by liberal media analyst Brian Stelter. On this week's Sunday show, Stelter's guests focused on deplatforming Newsmax. Previously, CNN had led efforts to deplatform President Donald Trump from Twitter. "We are going to have to figure out the OANN and Newsmax problem," Alex Stamos, a former Facebook chief security officer, told CNN's Stelter. "These companies have freedom of speech, but I'm not sure we need Verizon, AT&T, Comcast, and such bringing them into tens of millions of homes." In a brazen call for censorship, Stamos echoed CNN demand conservative voices and news outlets be blacklisted and closed out of cable television and the Internet. "We have to turn down the capability of these conservative influencers to reach these huge audiences," Stamos said. "There are people on YouTube that have larger daytime audiences than CNN."
originally posted by: texasgirl
originally posted by: Caled
Is it my imagination or do they all look at least part Asian?
originally posted by: CoramDeo
a reply to: Thoughtful1
Ignore the red circles.
I wonder if her protection is hand-picked.
Someone on there commented the uniforms are askew and mismatched. Is that true? If so, are they really not NG in the photo?
originally posted by: SoulReaper
Take it for what you will... no substantiated source.. but this came across my radar.
I'm skeptical.. but will tune in anyways
Soul
originally posted by: Caled
Where did that come from?
originally posted by: SoulReaper
Take it for what you will... no substantiated source.. but this came across my radar.
I'm skeptical.. but will tune in anyways
Soul