-@TH3WH17ERABB17- -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART- - 32 -

Dashen I am sending you a pm. I tried before but deleted the reply before reading. I am just struggling along trying to navigate. I keep trying.

This is awesome. Texas gives a scathing rebuttal to the Defendants affidavit submitted yesterday.

www.supremecourt.gov...

a reply to: saladfingers123456

If you follow Dashen, Rel and Boom are both showing as two of his followers. My handle is @love720091 no profile pic

@Dashen I tried to message you for info not sure I did it right

@Salad can you message me yours I am not proficient at sending messages through ATS and not sure Dashen's went through lol

a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

Twitter says:

"No results for "RSHISATS"
The term you entered did not bring up any results. You may have mistyped your term or your Search settings could be protecting you from some potentially sensitive content."

I only got on Twitter to follow certain people and don't know much about it, so I may have to find and reset search settings to "Normal Human Being That Doesn't need A Safe Space""

a reply to: Frodolives

Bravo.

a reply to: Hamlin

I get your point, but it's easier said than done. You can't just learn Python (or find someone who knows it willing to invest the time... small pool of people here), and I imagine when Rel started compiling things, Q posts were pretty regular (with no idea how long they would go on for), so I'd have to guess that compiling them was more important than creating a custom program.
Regarding my above point about "how long it would go on for"... I can't imagine anyone expected it to still be going on at this point, or that there would be so many posts! Once you start down a path, at what point do you decide you need to change it, or whether it is worth it? Especially if it serves it's purpose.

If you're right, and excel is not easier to convert, then it becomes very difficult to get anyone to pick it up without being paid for it. I understand your point, I just think it is easier to say these things from the outside. Hindsight being 2020 eh...

a reply to: bradychick
Brady I think we should look at the word amp in those two similar posts. Two ways to look at that word. Amp up or ramp up their efforts and pull this across the finish line.
Also interesting is the definition of "elementary charge". The SC justices should just consider the primary charge and focus on it and not get sidetracked on other tangents. It is about the constitution. We know voter and ballot fraud has taken place but they need to remain focused.

www.britannica.com...

Well, probably because that will take us to about 5pm.

originally posted by: Hamlin
a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

I wouldn't do it for free myself, but there must be other users who actually care enough to take half a day to build it.

Why 7 hours?

a reply to: bradychick

CHECK UR EMAIL AND SPAM

a reply to: saladfingers123456

I get what you are saying.

But its nothing to do with YOU as you don't do it. Rel said he spent months updating his excel spreadsheets to account for twitter special characters. If he still puts in this amount of time and effort into it then its for HIS benefit.

From your view its like meh, either way you get the results. But someone is wasting a lot of their own time.

Hindsight is 2020 but also you know... its still relevant. Unless this thing is winding down and is no longer relevant. If you think people are still sending hidden messages to you in twitter posts then surely there is a future market in that.

It looks like we're nearing that "so long and thanks for all the fish" moment. Some interesting info about traffic to this site. What's up with all the interest in Tibetan caves?

originally posted by: Caled
Well, probably because that will take us to about 5pm.

originally posted by: Hamlin
a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

I wouldn't do it for free myself, but there must be other users who actually care enough to take half a day to build it.

Why 7 hours?

Not for Rel it wouldn't.

What happens at 5pm? Did I miss a big announcement?


edit: Rel answered this for me, 5pm "break" time

originally posted by: PokeyJoe
This is awesome. Texas gives a scathing rebuttal to the Defendants affidavit submitted yesterday.

www.supremecourt.gov...

Scathing is right! And damn, the lawyers doing this are sharp as a tack.
Thanks for that.

a reply to: Hamlin

Re 7 hours... because of the earlier decodes on the BREAK, Look to Twitter... and 17 jets possibly indicating the break is at 5pm!

We differ on approach but it matters not because the hour is nigh!

You'ld need to be paid... I've foregone over half a million in earnings over the 3 years, and used up some savings. We each make our choices - comme ci comme ca.

originally posted by: PurpleFox

originally posted by: carewemust

Important statement from the U.S. Supreme Court, directed to the Pennsylvania Secretary of State, PA Supreme Court, Governor Tom Wolf, and others..

That question has national importance, and there is a strong likelihood that the State Supreme Court decision violates the Federal Constitution.

The provisions of the Federal Constitution conferring on state legislatures, not state courts, the authority to make rules governing federal elections would be meaningless if a state court could override the rules adopted by the legislature simply by claiming that a state constitutional provision gave the courts the authority to make whatever rules it thought appropriate for the conduct of a fair election. See Art. I, §4, cl. 1; Art. II, §1, cl. 2.

Source: www.supremecourt.gov...

What does this mean exactly? Was this written recently or is this from October?

Late October: www.supremecourt.gov... and still applies today...and forever.

a reply to: Hamlin

Just to clarify, I didn't spend months of effort on the special characters... just added to the formula over months when new characters appeared.

Anywho... time to get back on topic, for me at least.

Thank you Dashen !

No surprise: Wisconsin judge just ruled to uphold Joe Biden as the winner in that state.

twitter.com...

a reply to: Frodolives

Heh heh.

In an effort to obfuscate their unconstitutional abrogation of election security measures in the name of COVID-19, Defendant States tack between misstating the facts pled in the Complaint and arguing that this Court can ignore the express language in those statutes. Neither approach has merit.

Don't mess with Texas.

Cheers

originally posted by: carewemust
No surprise: Wisconsin judge just ruled to uphold Joe Biden as the winner in that state.

twitter.com...

I'm not surprised. I live here. Our state government is composed of idiots and traitors.

Madison is Moscow.