It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Creep Thumper
a reply to: LanceCorvette
Has Biden been seen recently? I haven't seen him.
He's back in the casket in the dungeon.
originally posted by: Creep Thumper
a reply to: LanceCorvette
Has Biden been seen recently? I haven't seen him.
He's back in the casket in the dungeon.
originally posted by: Frodolives
I watched the entire news conference of Rudy and Sydney. I must say, they were freaking spectacular! They gave the media, the FBI, and the corrupt democrats both barrels. Balls on!
It makes me feel proud in at least some of our institutions for a change. There is not one iota of doubt as to their convictions or of the threat that this election has done to our republic. I wish I had the talent and the skills that many on here possess. You have all been so generous with your analysis of ongoing events and discoveries in these threads, and for that I am extremely grateful. The future of my children and grandchildren are at stake. You have all stood against a pervasive evil force infecting every aspect of our lives.
I pray the end result is as we have hoped. I feel optimistic and vindicated.
Thank you once again all of you.
Earlier this week, workers who were setting up the tree found a small owl among the branches of the 75-foot-tall Norway Spruce.
They called the Ravensbeard Wildlife Center in Saugerties, N.Y., for help.
The wildlife center posted on Facebook about the Saw-whet owl -- which they named “Rockefeller” -- on Tuesday.
Ravensbeard officials estimated the owl hadn’t eaten for three days as the Rockefeller traveled from Oneonta, N.Y., this week.
It was only when workers were unwrapping the massive spruce that they saw the owl in the branches, the New York Post reported.
originally posted by: FinallyFree72
originally posted by: LanceCorvette
a reply to: Thoughtful1
Tech startup founders in my opinion tend to be a bit self-important, maybe that's why they capitalized it? I don't know what the company is or does. Just my opinion.
@Care:
I don't know much election law but armchair quarterback I would like to have seen a court-supervised resolution to do whatever it is they're doing. I'm trusting the lawyers for now but I've never been a big fan of t.v. lawyers (I don't think Wood is one, not sure about the lady; and Rudy seems to be getting a little dotty these days)
I think what we see from Rudy is what happens when you are 3/4 of the way down the road on an investigation and you forget you’re talking to a noob... except times 1000 because he’s also annoyed with the media from slamming into their brick wall on Russian collusion, Biden’s laptop and now election fraud. He’s clearly exhausted and impatient and he’s not checking himself or taking a pause to remind himself to speak from a perspective of someone who isn’t sure. It’s like when you try to explain election fraud to a liberal friend but within 3 minutes you’re already talking about Q, lizard people, UFO’s, a global take over and brain implants. He’s coming across as a little loopy because he’s pushing more than most people are ready to hear and he’s openly annoyed when they are bewildered or uncertain. Maybe he’s just been doing this too long... like he said, he can “smell” crime and he knows what it looks like. Others probably can’t just look at what he’s looking at and see the same thing he sees.
originally posted by: FlyingFox
The würm turns...
twitter.com...
Estimated 4-6% we consider ‘hopeless' and forever brainwashed.
4-6% [brainwashed] will never wake up even when presented w/ FACTS.
originally posted by: Staffordshire1
Maybe just believe it.....just saying.
originally posted by: LanceCorvette
a reply to: PilSungMtnMan
Jurisdiction is an odd and tangled thing. I can't say how they'll get to SCOTUS.
And remember, SCOTUS doesn't have to accept the case. They're allowed to pick and choose what cases they want to hear.
This, my friend, is a YUGE risk in the strategy of "let them cheat and we'll show everyone but we'll win in the Supreme Court!"
I can't emphasize enough, YUGE risk in strategy.
originally posted by: PokeyJoe
a reply to: 0bserver1
If the US Military was operating in any foriegn country, we got permission from that countries leaders. So, if this is true, Merkel definitely approved it. Either that, or we just did it anyways, and said "F you Merkel".