-@TH3WH17ERABB17- -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART- - §3O§ -

a reply to: samuelsson

Right, so you didn't read my post and just gave me a link to an article I actually referenced.
A single company printing 50+ million mail in votes.

From that very article...

States need to decide what their ballots will look like and to get approval from the U.S. Postal Service for the design of the envelopes. After those envelopes are secured, companies like Runbeck step in.

The state designs it, and then it gets sent to the printer (in this case Runbeck of Arizona) who prints them for different areas.

Nearly a quarter of the 136 million presidential ballots cast 2016 were mailed in. That number could easily grow to well over half this year, especially if the health risk continues.

Ok, so half of 136 million is 68 million ballots ok....

"This year we are going to mail probably around 40 to 50 million pieces. We'll print probably close to 80 million, up to 100 million pieces when you count inserts," said Jeff Ellington, the company's president and chief operating officer.

Jeff Ellington is saying that they are going to print 80 million... That to me sounds like they are pretty much printing the entire quota.

Did you even read the actual article you reference?

How on Earth do you turn that into printed in each state? Maybe I am missing something fundamental, but there is nothing in that article that backs up what you said.

A special place is reserved for Soros.

SOROS ties to the election software used in Michigan to steal it from Trump.

DOMINION

a reply to: samuelsson

From what I've been reading while the states print their own ballots, there are only several vendors that supply the paper for those ballots... so take that for what you will. I can't find the place I saw it now though. It wouldn't be hard for Agents to mark the paper at it's source.

a reply to: saladfingers123456

Then they must have printed more than 500 million ballots total becaue that was the first article that came up and admittedly its 3:50 in the morning and getting tiresome reading about the DHS sting Trump is pulling on th dems when nothing seems to point in that direction. I want this to be true and thought it was.. until i saw it wasnt.

originally posted by: scraedtosleep
a reply to: saladfingers123456

But wouldn't you expect the illegals to live in the dem areas regardless?

Was this meant for me? I'm not sure I understand the point regarding what you are replying to, sorry

Joe’s Instagram has been quite, just this creepy sunglasses post 🕶

Joe Bidens Instagram

Inhale
Inhale
Hold
Hold
Hold
Exhale
Exhale
One more Time
One more Time
(Remember, we will win)

“....We’ll come out on the other side”

Edit: I added the end part and there was three holds.

Also sunglasses going from dark to light back to dark.

a reply to: samuelsson

That is fine. I'm just trying to work it out, and this hasn't been fully explored on this thread so far as I know. Maybe elsewhere, but not here. That is why I decided to tackle it. Like you, I want it to be true, but there has been zero time for any indication that it is or isn't true. I make no call as to it's reality. I merely stated a case giving evidence and sources that say that it isn't totally impossible.

Remember, this is a Q thread, and I point to a Q post that declares an intent along these lines. Under that premise, it might be possible. But then, Q might be a total load of bunk... but there seems more evidence to me that it isn't.

Last thing I want is to argue about this stuff, I just want to discuss, explore and present evidence and sources... that is all we have. Get some sleep mate

Best wishes

p.s. I didn't realise that Iceland was on the same time zone as the UK... I too need some sleep! Probably getting a bit cranky (no offence cranky : D )

Ok, more info trickling out makes me think the left hand didn’t communicate with the right hand with the Dems.

- poll workers panic in wee hours and load up the fake ballots, all at once.

- Unbeknownst to them, the cyber Dems panic and crank up the Dominion/Hammer (WTF ever) cyber hack and juices the numbers.

This results in the math/science defying spike in Biden numbers. It also explains the whacky mass ballots that are for Biden with no down vote selections.

Poll working fraudster is used to dealing with tens & hundreds. When forced into tens of thousands it got sideways.

In the end, IF they are ever able to sort it out, the red wave very well may have tried to happen. Somewhere around 10pm to midnight on election night, panic set in. Then when they realized not only did they double whammy the counts they had to start denying access to the sites.

This is like the Kobayashi Maru test. Unbeatable. Unless.

Still back a few pages trying to catch up. Biden speaking now. Anyone else notice how he has sounded a lot more lucid in the last week? It has just stuck out to me. A few weeks ago, he could barely finish a complete sentence. He still mucks up words but he has seemed more with it. Makes sense if he thinks he's going to win & not face prosecution.

originally posted by: Observationalist
Joe’s Instagram has been quite, just this creepy sunglasses post 🕶

Joe Bidens Insagram

Inhale
Inhale
Hold
Hold
Exhale
Exhale

“....We’ll come out on the other side”

We'll meet people at the finish line with margaritas in hand.

It sounds like we jumped off the merry-g0-round a while ago.

originally posted by: LanceCorvette

originally posted by: imthegoat

originally posted by: PilSungMtnMan

originally posted by: justsaying111

originally posted by: PilSungMtnMan

originally posted by: PokeyJoe
a reply to: Quadrivium

WOW! SCOTUS already getting involved. I’m starting to get a little more positive on my outlook. Still think Biden will steal it, and officially be declared POTUS, but I think we really will find out that a concerted voter fraud campaign was perpetrated against us. They will probably try to play it off like Joe had no idea and wasn’t involved, but we’re starting to see some positive action all of a sudden.

Very early stages but i will say this; if ACB even THINKS about recusal she should be impeached.

Assuming that happens and we get a 4 -4 ruling what happens? I should know this but I dont lol.

Goes back to lower court. Trump loses.

There's a reason why Trump packed 200+ judges in the courts, and ACB was forced through with the nomination. Wait for it.

I'm saying this with love and not as a criticism, but I play with words for a living, and words matter. Words can create or alter a mood, a meaning. Words can influence people to think one thing or another even when describing the same event. A "horrific automobile crash" or "a fender bender."

So, that said,

Trump didn't "pack" the courts. He appointed judges per his constitutional responsibility. Court "packing" has been long understood to mean creating additional seats on an appeals court, then appointing judges loyal to the party that created the additional seats, to screw over the opposing party.

The nomination of ACB was not "forced" through by Trump or anyone. Again, Trump did his constitutional duty to appoint a judge to a vacancy on the Supreme Court, and the senate confirmed that appointment. There was nothing unusual or out of the ordinary in either the time it took him to nominate her, or the time it took the Senate to confirm her.

lol I know, it was a poor choice of words. I didn't use the words "packed" or "forced" in the way the media/politicians use it. I used it as a general term, speaking to a general populace. I promise I wasn't using the words in the context that "they" use. I play with words too; when it's appropriate to do so. If this was any other setting than ATS I most likely would've used different terminology. I use simple terms when I'm speaking in a simple context. Saying "pack the courts" is a lot less work than saying "Trump appointed 200+ judges per his constitutional duty." Does that make sense? lol. Professional settings I wouldn't use those terms to describe it. I'm smarter than I look, I promise.

a reply to: saladfingers123456

Plato said something like, "the greatness of a man lays in what he does with his power".

Substitute money for power.

Like a science or technology; inherently it's neither good nor evil, it's what you do with it.

Abuse of Power


An interesting video by Craig Sawyer. He claims Sydney Powell has uncovered evidence that the CIA has used its hammer program in this election fraud going on. Will need to wait and see what comes out, one to watch out for.

Well, that Biden speech was like every other political BS speech I heard before Trump came along. So for those missing the good old days of lies and lying liars, if Biden is in, they’ll be happy again.

a reply to: FlyingFox

lol... perhaps. But I've had money, and all it brought was misery. I've never been happier than I am now, despite the world.

Inside job?

Georgia officials say abnormal company update caused a glitch that halted machine voting for hours in two counties

This is unprecedented. If a last minute firmware/software update really did take place, and it failed, it explains all the "voting machines are down" reports that happened on election day. It smells like a deployment issue. As a software engineer that was responsible for automatic update systems in the past, I am familiar with the difficulties and possible scenarios of "bricking" devices during firmware update failure.

My question is, did this "update" get approved by officials? As far as I know all software for voting systems need to be certified and tested by the U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC) in accordance with federal Voluntary Voting Systems (VVSG) guidelines. It even says so on their website. www.dominionvoting.com...

This needs to be investigated. Who approved this update? What was the reason for it? What was it fixing? Why was it last minute? This is serious.

Jay sekulow on Hannity just said recount and test ballots. I wonder what he meant by test ballots

a reply to: saladfingers123456

I said yesterday before your post that it looked like hope porn (ironically, Dr. Farrell said the same) and based on certain actors pushing it gave me red flags until further valid evidence is brought to light. Sorry, I skipped a few pages today and never seen your post so thanks for the link back. This is a complex case given all the disinfo mixed in with valid info it's difficult to really know and I know nothing about ballots. Printer tracking has been around since the 90s. Though, when clowns like this guy start pushing the watermark theory that this will carry Trump over the finish line I have to wonder what is going on. That is to say I'm not doubting the watermark on some ballots but how it's being pitched across social media as a hail Mary. Maybe it will, maybe this is the Trump card but I'm just skeptical of everything the past few weeks given all the political turmoil shenanigans. I think it's more complex or rather convoluted as to the details on how these ballots are authenticated from state to state, county to county and beyond my understanding or interest.

Every Q drop is a matter of strong interpretation especially those riddled with Questions. Now this vote counting/ballot mess will be the hot topic across the Interwebs until the left changes the narrative again and off we go chasing that rabbit. It's crazy times.

I'll have to dig into this more as further info comes out but my energy has run low on this particular subject so will wait till the dust settles a bit...

And this thread is moving faster than ballot counting.

originally posted by: SuperStudChuck
Well, that Biden speech was like every other political BS speech I heard before Trump came along. So for those missing the good old days of lies and lying liars, if Biden is in, they’ll be happy again.

Folks on 8ch said it was a video shown on the stage. That he wasn’t actually there. 2 hours late for a video. Imagine how many takes it took?!

originally posted by: CanadianMason

Election or no election, this is where we are all sitting.

Enjoy each moment!

I think more like...



The World is watching.