-@TH3WH17ERABB17- -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART- - §3O§ -

a reply to: EndtheMadnessNow

To both yourself and PilSung... I might have missed it, but how was it debunked? I don't know if you read it, but I did try to compile a plausable case for it back on page 313 (EDITED to be correct) LINK TO POST. It didn't seem to be totally pie in the sky.

Is anyone able to point me to what specifically debunks the idea? I mean, if you're here and support/follow the Q as being true in some form of the other, then how can you dismiss the following drop? It points directly to some form of operation around the ballots and DHS. If not watermarking, then there has to be something, otherwise why would Q bother mentioning it at all? Genuinely interested in your views. I'm totally open to all considered thoughts.



Headline: WHAT IF THE BELOW COULD BE PROVEN?

To be fair, this could be relative to the time it was put out... but it seems more relevant now than ever.

originally posted by: PilSungMtnMan

originally posted by: justsaying111

originally posted by: PilSungMtnMan

originally posted by: PokeyJoe
a reply to: Quadrivium

WOW! SCOTUS already getting involved. I’m starting to get a little more positive on my outlook. Still think Biden will steal it, and officially be declared POTUS, but I think we really will find out that a concerted voter fraud campaign was perpetrated against us. They will probably try to play it off like Joe had no idea and wasn’t involved, but we’re starting to see some positive action all of a sudden.

Very early stages but i will say this; if ACB even THINKS about recusal she should be impeached.

Assuming that happens and we get a 4 -4 ruling what happens? I should know this but I dont lol.

Goes back to lower court. Trump loses.

There's a reason why Trump packed 200+ judges in the courts, and ACB was forced through with the nomination. Wait for it.

a reply to: saladfingers123456

Ffs.

gab.com...

It's been debunked. Many times. The states print their own ballots and can decide themselves what if any protection is used aparently.

I think a good question to ask right now, looking ahead at the future of the electoral process, if something happens and all the BS ballots are sorted out and Trump is declared the winner, before going to court, will the ones responsible for this charade still be held responsible? Will the system be capable of being fixed if this does not go to court and the truth laid bare for all to see? What happens if nothing happens now, even when Trump takes his next four years? He is owed another term after this one due to the actions of the Dems during the first term. So that's eight years of Trump. Wonderful to think about. But, what happens after that? Does all this happen again as soon as the next presidency is up for grabs? Can Trump, during his next terms, fix this so it doesn't happen again, or can it only be fixed once the populace is fully aware of the snake that has been hiding in the reeds?

a reply to: saladfingers123456

Correct me if I'm wrong but, didn't you say you were a hypnotherapist or some such thing?

If that is the case, may I PM you for some advice, having to do with my professional career?

originally posted by: samuelsson
a reply to: saladfingers123456

Ffs.

gab.com...

It's been debunked. Many times. The states print their own ballots and can decide themselves what if any protection is used aparently.

Mate... did you even read what my post??? I stated very clearly in it that I was pointing directly at MAIL IN VOTES. There was proof in there that they are not printed in state. It is the mail in votes that are the danger. Go back and read what I wrote. LINK

Man, that is frustrating. You don't need to start posts with "ffs". I'm trying to work out the reality, not post propaganda. I wouldn't have written any of that if I thought it was total bunk.

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: IAMTAT

We can always hope, but that doesn't save Georgia and it won't do anything about Arizona or Nevada or Wisconsin or Michigan. It won't salvage North Carolina either. I feel like that play with Georgia and North Carolina was to hold the two in reserve in case they needed to yank back one or both at the last second.

This is exactly why they have been stalling. Georgia and NC are their "just in case" plays.

originally posted by: CanadianMason
a reply to: saladfingers123456

Correct me if I'm wrong but, didn't you say you were a hypnotherapist or some such thing?

If that is the case, may I PM you for some advice, having to do with my professional career?

Nope, wasn't me, though I have studied aspects of that over the years. But you are welcome to message me any time you like about anything you like. I know you're one of the good ones

p.s. All I am is an animator/artist/musician ...I claim to be nothing more than that. But I spend most of my time studying the esoteric, geometry, world events, religion, understanding, philosophy and anything along those lines... I really don't do anywhere near enough actual work to make money. I should though, because I'm super poor... I just hate money and everything it brings. However, I'm quite happy in my poordom, and no one can buy me. I am part of no group, no organisation, no secret society, no fraternity, no circle, not even Q. But I align with the message of Q of thinking for yourself, and I ask nothing of anyone other than that. I also ask no one to believe anything I say, but merely to question it and find your own conclusion.

a reply to: CanadianMason

I'm really hoping you're right. Heck, we all are here!
Might have to find a mason and get it engraved in stone.😎
Everything was moving at warp speed in 2020 and now they gotta drag out the election results.

Great video.

originally posted by: imthegoat

originally posted by: PilSungMtnMan

originally posted by: justsaying111

originally posted by: PilSungMtnMan

originally posted by: PokeyJoe
a reply to: Quadrivium

WOW! SCOTUS already getting involved. I’m starting to get a little more positive on my outlook. Still think Biden will steal it, and officially be declared POTUS, but I think we really will find out that a concerted voter fraud campaign was perpetrated against us. They will probably try to play it off like Joe had no idea and wasn’t involved, but we’re starting to see some positive action all of a sudden.

Very early stages but i will say this; if ACB even THINKS about recusal she should be impeached.

Assuming that happens and we get a 4 -4 ruling what happens? I should know this but I dont lol.

Goes back to lower court. Trump loses.

There's a reason why Trump packed 200+ judges in the courts, and ACB was forced through with the nomination. Wait for it.

I'm saying this with love and not as a criticism, but I play with words for a living, and words matter. Words can create or alter a mood, a meaning. Words can influence people to think one thing or another even when describing the same event. A "horrific automobile crash" or "a fender bender."

So, that said,

Trump didn't "pack" the courts. He appointed judges per his constitutional responsibility. Court "packing" has been long understood to mean creating additional seats on an appeals court, then appointing judges loyal to the party that created the additional seats, to screw over the opposing party.

The nomination of ACB was not "forced" through by Trump or anyone. Again, Trump did his constitutional duty to appoint a judge to a vacancy on the Supreme Court, and the senate confirmed that appointment. There was nothing unusual or out of the ordinary in either the time it took him to nominate her, or the time it took the Senate to confirm her.

Election or no election, this is where we are all sitting.

Enjoy each moment!

a reply to: queenofswords

whyy.org...

I really messed that up. CT originally said the "Frankly it's all very embarassing." part. The rest is my response. I apologize for wasting space in this thread to clarify.

I just wanted also to say thanks to everyone on this board. You have helped me learn and understand so many new subjects/ideas/opinions and so on. You all are a big part of my awakening and I have to say THANK YOU!!! for all of your efforts/research/time and dedication to this thread and the movement it is discussing. In fact you all have been a calming place to come to. There are some very intelligent and genuine people on this board and it shows!

God Bless All

originally posted by: nisei

originally posted by: Creep Thumper

Frankly it's all very embarrassing.

"A failed and corrupt system" Just like President Trump said, and yes it is utterly ridiculous these individuals are paid by us to represent us and do absolutely nothing. You know what the root of the problem is, is the US is a corporation and just like every business/corporation in America and world wide there is BS politics, bad management, and individuals who just do not do their job and sponge their pay. Maybe if more people worked like they were working for God rather than the company/individual the world would be a better place. I mean God has you working that job for a reason.

This whole thing is extremely insane, just the amount of people that are completely brainwashed. I feel like I am in 2 different realities every day between work and home. It gets to be much at times. Ive learned to focus more on God during this time and it (of course) has helped tremendously. God is good.....always!!!

a reply to: saladfingers123456

But wouldn't you expect the illegals to live in the dem areas regardless?

a reply to: saladfingers123456

Yes that was in refrence to the mailin ballots. Neon was floating that idea when it first surfaced yesterday. And Yes mailin ballots are printed by the states. Simple google search..

www.google.com...

Endless articles about random printing companys having to print non stop to meetup with demand of mail in ballots.

No DHS, no special watetmarks unless the state requires it and no plan it seems.

a reply to: LanceCorvette

I'm saying this with love and not as a criticism, but I play with words for a living, and words matter. Words can create or alter a mood, a meaning. Words can influence people to think one thing or another even when describing the same event. A "horrific automobile crash" or "a fender bender."

Okay. So, a few posts back, I asked Saladfingers for some career advice. I am a professional defensive driving instructor now, as of a month ago. COVID forced me to re-evaluate my life, to think out of the box. I was sick of sitting at home idle for seven months straight, going carzy. That led me to take a course to learn how to teach people how to drive.

I actually manifested my intention, and here I am, now working in the industry, and I find myself struggling with WORDS.

Any advice on how to manipulate reality in such a way as to make it comply to your will, hypnotically speaking?

People are weirdly wired in so many different and unique ways in so far as teaching them how to drive goes. One method doesn't work for everybody. I'm starting to think it's all about psychology.



Asking you, through a mask.

a reply to: PokeyJoe

These guys.
mobile.twitter.com...

Rumor Control CISA.gov Website

Maybe this?

originally posted by: saladfingers123456
a reply to: EndtheMadnessNow

To both yourself and PilSung... I might have missed it, but how was it debunked? I don't know if you read it, but I did try to compile a plausable case for it back on page 313 (EDITED to be correct) LINK TO POST. It didn't seem to be totally pie in the sky.

Is anyone able to point me to what specifically debunks the idea? I mean, if you're here and support/follow the Q as being true in some form of the other, then how can you dismiss the following drop? It points directly to some form of operation around the ballots and DHS. If not watermarking, then there has to be something, otherwise why would Q bother mentioning it at all? Genuinely interested in your views. I'm totally open to all considered thoughts.

Headline: WHAT IF THE BELOW COULD BE PROVEN?

To be fair, this could be relative to the time it was put out... but it seems more relevant now than ever.

Link



Read the above description.

In my hand is a mail in ballot. That ballot does NOT have any watermark of any sort on it at all. Nothing that comports with the above statement.

So, is the ballot a fake? Was it printed from a company that didn't bother following the rules? Was the above a suggestion, and could be ignored? Is it from Chayna?

I don't know, but I know it has none of the markings on it, nor does it have any other obvious features to separate it from a random piece of paper with printing on it. And I know 99 percent of the population didn't know to look.

For clarification, this is an unsolicited mail in ballot. Not the in person ballot.

It should be obvious that the ballot of diversity was created long long ago to be the tool of fraud. The subsequent arguments of "states rights" or "everyone is different" or "we can't make them all the same, impossible..." were excuses created AFTER the fact to justify the built in fraud.

The fact that we are even having the conversation or argument reveals the truth... "Voting is to GD important to be left in the hands of the population at large." Ergo, "so we do not now, nor have we ever, given the slave population the right to choose, we've given them right to cast a ballot and we never made the claim that vote would in fact matter in the end, as we're not that dumb."

a reply to: crankyoldman

Yes state of california requires it. Doesnt mean all others do. Im guessing AZ PA and what is the county left to be declared MI? Dont require any watermarks or special tints.