It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: spy66
If God always was and always is... And God created the heaven and the Earth. This means that God must have some Properties.
If God always was and always is makes God absolute infinite. If God is infinite that means God takes up all Space there is...
So, before God created the heaven and the Earth. There was only God (The Infinite absolute empty void).
Before God created the haven and the Earth. The infinite void of Space must have been absolute empty because Heaven and Earth was not created yet. For heaven and Earth to exist they must take up Space. And heaven and Earth must be made up of physical Properties that are not infinite. This means that Earth is not infinite nor is Heaven.
Since God takes up abolute all Space there is,.... God must create the Heaven and the Earth for it to exist. But since God take up all Space there is God can not use external Properties to create The Heaven and The Earth. Because before God created the heaven and the Earth there was only God. To be able to grasp the answer to Your question it is important that you understand this bit.....
When God takes up all Space there is.... Heaven and Earth can only be created/formed out of the Properties of a absolute infinite empty void (The Properties of God).
This makes God both exsternal and The Heaven and the Earth at the same time. With Our termes we use the definitions to describe the differance between Infinite and finite.
................. All finites must be formed. The infinite always existed……………..
This is also related to time. Finite time always changes. Absolute time does not.
But God did say: Let there be light. The Word..... ?
originally posted by: TheConstruKctionofLight
The tzimtzum or tsimtsum (Hebrew צמצום ṣimṣūm "contraction/constriction/condensation") is a term used in the Lurianic Kabbalah to explain Isaac Luria's doctrine that God began the process of creation by "contracting" his Ohr Ein Sof (infinite light) in order to allow for a "conceptual space" in which finite and seemingly independent realms could exist. This primordial initial contraction, forming a ḥālāl happānuy "vacant space" (חלל הפנוי) into which new creative light could beam, is denoted by general reference to the tzimtzum. In contrast to earlier, Medieval Kabbalah, this made the first creative act a concealment/Divine exile rather than unfolding revelation. This dynamic crisis-catharsis in the Divine flow is repeated throughout the Lurianic scheme.
Because the tzimtzum results in the "empty space" in which spiritual and physical Worlds and ultimately, free will can exist,
originally posted by: Xtrozero
So 3 simple words... The Big Bang.... Once we had Gods for everything we did not understand, 100s of them, so what makes this different in we can not understand the big bang and what is actually outside of our universe, so we say "God did it" just like we once thought the wind or a planet was a God.
originally posted by: Itisnowagain
a reply to: neutronflux
God does not peice things together.....God is the whole.
Words and the belief in a you with separate power make believe that there are separate things.
What is happening is happening......it is the whole.
originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: TzarChasm
If god can just piece together things, that’s like calling a home builder god.
A true god to me creates the reality. Makes the natural laws.
Or does god start where the physical ends/bleeds into the soul/spiritual.
If the aspect of this reality is only physical, I assume anyone can be a god. If there is a being that created the reality of this universe b” vs a natural process, that is a “true” god.
If the universe came first, anyone can be god.
If the universe came from the being of god, then there is a “true” god.
originally posted by: TzarChasm
originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: TzarChasm
If god can just piece together things, that’s like calling a home builder god.
A true god to me creates the reality. Makes the natural laws.
Or does god start where the physical ends/bleeds into the soul/spiritual.
If the aspect of this reality is only physical, I assume anyone can be a god. If there is a being that created the reality of this universe b” vs a natural process, that is a “true” god.
If the universe came first, anyone can be god.
If the universe came from the being of god, then there is a “true” god.
That depends on whether you can provide a sample of the substance you call "god's being" so it can be studied and used to identify other examples of such substance.
For my definition of God: God in concept is the creator cause of man and the universe and everything with a beginning." -Pachomius [17 words]
And for universe, my definition is the following: universe in concept is everything observable to man, in particular to scientists to study - most importantly in regard to its origin.
This is the title of the thread from Pachomius:
Wanted: Honest intelligent productive thinking to resolve the issue God exists or not.
And the OP is as follows:
[posted on Jun, 25 2020 @ 01:12 PM]
On the assumption that mankind sincerely seeks knowledge, I submit that it is possible for any person to come to resolve the issue God exists or not, with honest intelligent productive thinking, i.e., thinking on truths, facts, logic, and the history of ideas. Now, honest intelligent productive thinking on the said issue must start with working together to concur on the concept of God. What do you dear colleagues here say?
originally posted by: neutronflux
originally posted by: TzarChasm
originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: TzarChasm
If god can just piece together things, that’s like calling a home builder god.
A true god to me creates the reality. Makes the natural laws.
Or does god start where the physical ends/bleeds into the soul/spiritual.
If the aspect of this reality is only physical, I assume anyone can be a god. If there is a being that created the reality of this universe b” vs a natural process, that is a “true” god.
If the universe came first, anyone can be god.
If the universe came from the being of god, then there is a “true” god.
That depends on whether you can provide a sample of the substance you call "god's being" so it can be studied and used to identify other examples of such substance.
If god was real, why would god allow to be caught in such a fashion? Can you catch a soul if it’s real?
originally posted by: TheConstruKctionofLight
Even the big Bang Theory is not complete
If I didn’t believe in god. How would you prove the universe was not the product of a purely physical event void of intelligent design?
originally posted by: TzarChasm
originally posted by: neutronflux
originally posted by: TzarChasm
originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: TzarChasm
If god can just piece together things, that’s like calling a home builder god.
A true god to me creates the reality. Makes the natural laws.
Or does god start where the physical ends/bleeds into the soul/spiritual.
If the aspect of this reality is only physical, I assume anyone can be a god. If there is a being that created the reality of this universe b” vs a natural process, that is a “true” god.
If the universe came first, anyone can be god.
If the universe came from the being of god, then there is a “true” god.
That depends on whether you can provide a sample of the substance you call "god's being" so it can be studied and used to identify other examples of such substance.
If god was real, why would god allow to be caught in such a fashion? Can you catch a soul if it’s real?
But why would he hide?