It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Trillium
New Q drop
Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 ID: 0e1cdf No.9056552
May 6 2020 18:32:34 (EST) NEW
twitter.com...
Worth remembering.
[note: rare 'truth' caught on camera]
Q
originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
a reply to: Quadrivium
Quadrivium, maybe the reason POTUS is talking vaccines rather than HCQ is because he's steering Gates/pharmas into starting production of their compromised vaccines?
They will be a heck of a lot easier to convict if there are a billion vaccine doses compromised with nanobots and other viruses/heavy metals in, stored in a warehouse with their name on it?
originally posted by: PilSungMtnMan
originally posted by: Trillium
New Q drop
Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 ID: 0e1cdf No.9056552
May 6 2020 18:32:34 (EST) NEW
twitter.com...
Worth remembering.
[note: rare 'truth' caught on camera]
Q
Why this isn’t more widely discussed is troublesome.
originally posted by: carewemust
originally posted by: SKEPTEK
New Q.
4118
Please drop the hammer on Schiff Q!
We have been waiting for 3 years!
Director of National Intelligence Grinnell says if Schiff does not release the newly Declassified documents, he will do so personally.
twitter.com...
I hope grinnell's replacement, congressman John Ratcliffe, is as serious about transparency as Grinnell has been over the past 3 weeks, in his temporary role.
Source: www.politico.com...
The House Intelligence Committee spokesman indicated that the panel would be reviewing the intelligence community’s proposed redactions:
“Our review of ODNI’s newly proposed redactions will be as expeditious as possible given the constraints of the pandemic, and we look forward to releasing these transcripts, which relate to misconduct by the Trump campaign and the president himself.”
Aides to Grenell did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
The US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has ruled that artificial intelligence systems cannot be credited as an inventor in a patent, the agency announced earlier this week. The decision came in response to two patents — one for a food container and the other for a flashing light — that were created by an AI system called DABUS.
Among the USPTO’s arguments is the fact that US patent law repeatedly refers to inventors using humanlike terms such as “whoever” and pronouns like “himself” and “herself.”