It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: tennisdawg
Vaccines will not work. I repeat.... Vaccines will not work. The only thing we can do is a repeating pattern of social distancing, opening back up slowly, shutting down again, social distancing, opening back up slowly, shutting down, etc.
originally posted by: MrRCflying
So, yes, 68,587 confirmed deaths due to covid19 in the last 60 days.
originally posted by: tanstaafl
originally posted by: MrRCflying
So, yes, 68,587 confirmed deaths due to covid19 in the last 60 days.
No. The majority of those deaths are not from COVID. PERIOD.
You are being lied to... and you are lapping it up.
originally posted by: tennisdawg
originally posted by: MrRCflying
originally posted by: Byrd
originally posted by: MrRCflying
originally posted by: Byrd
originally posted by: MrRCflying
That 60,000 estimate keeps creeping up. First it went to 65,000, then 67,000, and is now 72,000+ but it will have to be revised upward again, as the prediction model is not matching reality.
What's happening is that people aren't wearing masks, disinfecting, and social distancing. That, and it's now hitting the areas with less health care (poorer workers and now factories and prisons.)
It has a large effect on the rate of spread. One person can take it home to their family and their family then takes it throughout the community. In a number of cases, the affected person picks it up at a crowded work area (meat packing plant) in one county but takes it home to another county where they live.
That's what's going on in Amarillo, Texas where the Feds are going in to try and stop the spread.
I don't disagree with your statements at all.
Still, I don't see the 60,000 deaths projections being real in any way. It was dropped to that for public consumption. I believe they knew the 100 - 240k number was realistic, but based on public reaction it was decided to throw out a lower number and bump that number up over time, so it was not as much of a shock.
I do think it is entirely possible, that we could reach an even higher number of deaths because of the reasons you stated.
I would disagree, having looked at the models. Remember, the initial range of the R0 number was all over the place. As we got better info, the R0 number changed to quite low and then bounced back up.
The idea of "they" knowing something isn't realistic, IMHO... because the modeling was coming from a lot of different unconnected sources and many published the details of the models so that other researchers and the public could check them. If it had been some sort of coordinated effort, this wouldn't have happened.
I agree, however, that we're going to see higher numbers. This is going to hammer the lower end of the job market in the US.
Point taken...
Since this is a conspiracy forum, let's call it my pet theory.
I don't think anyone could "know" for certainty, just too many factors. It is just my opinion that there were beliefs (which were publicly announced) that a predicted number of deaths between 100,000 and 240,000 was reasonable and likely.
We then had that projection cut by half or better to around 60,000.
Now we are beginning to see the number creep back up, to possibly 180,000 before the end of summer. Pretty much the average of the 2, midline.
It just seems suspect to me at least, the predicted number was dropped so low, now it is slowly moving back toward that midline.
I could be way off base here, who knows, but I believe there was a high level of confidence in the 100 - 240k number. Maybe, just maybe the 60k number was thrown out after the fact to try and quell fears, and now that things are north of that, they are slowly upping the numbers back towards that original midline.
Either way, it has not been good, it will continue to not be good for some time yet. Nothing like we have ever seen, and hopefully when it is all said and done, we will never see anything like it again.
MrRCFlying,
I have followed all of your posts closely. Your theory is actually pretty accurate as far as I can tell. Based on available data, nothing should have compelled them to drop the death total to 60,000 at that time. If anything, they should have been raising it.
I only jumped in to say that the information I have seen will put us closer to 500,000 deaths in the USA alone by the end of this year. Everyone is forgetting that this will cycle through every human 3 times. That is by design. We are not even through the first cycle, and likely won't be until late September - early October.
Keep your eyes out for what happens to the asymptomatic carriers from the first cycle once the 2nd cycle starts up. This is going to continue to get worse. We are looking at a 2 year minimum for all 3 cycles to complete.
Vaccines will not work. I repeat.... Vaccines will not work. The only thing we can do is a repeating pattern of social distancing, opening back up slowly, shutting down again, social distancing, opening back up slowly, shutting down, etc.
originally posted by: MrRCflying
If you recall in some of my previous posts, I have been comparing the actual death counts on a daily basis to the prediction models done by the IHME.
Three times, I said the prediction numbers would increase, because they were not matching up. Three times, they did increase. Again, it will have to be revised upwards. The IHME prediction model was last updated on 4/29, and will go up again.
The prediction will need to be moved up quite significantly once again. The US death toll as of 5/3 was 68,598. According to the IHME prediction we should not be at that level until 5/11. So the US is a full 7 days ahead of the prediction.
Now we have Dr. Scott Gottlieb, a former commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration, saying we may have a persistent spread throught the summer with approx. 1000 deaths a day. I am not sure how they are measuring "summer" here, but if it is now through the end of August, that would be another 120 days, give or take.
If that is the case, the US will be looking at an additional 120,000 deaths by the end of summer, with a toal somwhere north of 180,000 deaths.
Original predicted numbers, with mitigation was somwhere between 100,000 and 240,000. Then suddenly that changed, and dropped quickly to 60,000. We blew past that 60,000 number about 2 weeks after it was made. The IHME keeps revising the numbers upwards, although at a slow rate, a little here and a little there.
I believe it is intentional, to drip feed the bad reports. The average Joe will be like "OK, we are close, things will slow down. Oh, they added a few more, not too bad, we will begin to slow down soon." Like bringing the water temperature up to boiling, just a little at a time. Desensitizes the general public, instead of the shock number of almost 200,000 deaths. It also encourages the "it's just a flu" and 'hoax' narrative. For most, it is a slow moving train wreck, and they can't wrap thier minds around the end totals. We think in the here and now, with some awareness of the immediate future, but it is hard to conseptualize the long range, even a few months out.
Almost like watching paint dry. Sometimes the color changes as it dries, but if you sit and watch, you will not notice.
With things beginning to open, and governers basically flipping the bird to the path to re-open, and scientific data concerning resurgence, it may even yet go higher.
IMHO, the mitigation has worked, and we are still on the target for the original mitigation included numbers of 100,000- 240,000. It was lowered intentionally to reduce the shock and ease people into it. I am going to keep a close eye on this for sure.
Is it still a mild case of the flu?
Update on my Aunt in Kentucky: They still maintain that she is negitive, but moved her into the Covid ward. Makes sense, not... She is doing much better however, and is now off the vent.. Still not well, but it looks like she is out of the woods, and may be on the mend.
Links to the figures and information used above:
IHME
Worldometers
Dr Gottlieb
originally posted by: MrRCflying
Replying to my own post again....
Well, IHME just upped the predictions, as I said would happen. They have now increased the projected deaths from 72,000 to 134,475 by August 4th.
A higher jump in the predictions than what I was expecting.
IHME
originally posted by: Observationalist
Update: what’s happening Inside NY hospital.
Nurse from Nevada who went over to help at NY hospitals, gives an updates on what’s going on inside NY hospitals.
Instagram Post
“I will be signing an Executive Order to allow medical students who were slated to graduate this spring to begin practicing now,” Cuomo wrote on Twitter. “These are extraordinary times and New York needs the help.”
In a March 24 email to the Class of 2020, NYU Grossman School of Medicine said those who wish to join the healthcare workforce could start working as paid interns as soon as April, even if they had not been planning to work in the fields of internal medicine or emergency medicine
originally posted by: tennisdawg
MrRCFlying,
I have followed all of your posts closely. Your theory is actually pretty accurate as far as I can tell. Based on available data, nothing should have compelled them to drop the death total to 60,000 at that time. If anything, they should have been raising it.
I only jumped in to say that the information I have seen will put us closer to 500,000 deaths in the USA alone by the end of this year. Everyone is forgetting that this will cycle through every human 3 times. That is by design. We are not even through the first cycle, and likely won't be until late September - early October.
Keep your eyes out for what happens to the asymptomatic carriers from the first cycle once the 2nd cycle starts up. This is going to continue to get worse. We are looking at a 2 year minimum for all 3 cycles to complete.
Vaccines will not work. I repeat.... Vaccines will not work. The only thing we can do is a repeating pattern of social distancing, opening back up slowly, shutting down again, social distancing, opening back up slowly, shutting down, etc.
originally posted by: Byrd
originally posted by: MrRCflying
Replying to my own post again....
Well, IHME just upped the predictions, as I said would happen. They have now increased the projected deaths from 72,000 to 134,475 by August 4th.
A higher jump in the predictions than what I was expecting.
IHME
One thing we're (you and I) aren't taking into account is that they're fast-tracking some treatments for Covid-19. I have hopes for Remdesivir or any of the followups now in phase 2 clinical trials. It won't reduce the case loads but can drastically cut deaths.
So when a good treatment hits, we should see a crash in death rates. Let it be soon!
originally posted by: chris_stibrany
Why are they still using ventilators when it keeps being shown they make things worse?
Couldn't they switch to CPAP or simple supplemental oxygen?
a reply to: MrRCflying
originally posted by: Observationalist
Tough call... young men and women thrown into the front lines with only their college experience to bring to the fight.
I respect them wanting to help in the fight, but I also question the wisdom of having newly trained individuals in a new and intensely stressful environment, making decisions where precious experiences is a prerequisite.
originally posted by: puzzled2
a reply to: angelchemuel
Jane
Tests picked up 'dead virus fragments'
So still no confirmed re-infection.
originally posted by: Brick17
a reply to: alphabetaone
However, TD, whoever he is (he has touched on this and where he is, job role too) has given out a lot of information about the virus and its impact much earlier in the thread (page 1), months ago, he also explained why he felt he should be sharing what he did and why he could. Thing is, what he shared came to be, before it came to be.