It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: cirrus12
And a symptom is conjunctivitis also
a reply to: angelchemuel
originally posted by: Byrd
originally posted by: MrRCflying
Kinda sounds like Remdesivir is a flop.
The article is saying it works, kind of. Symptoms shortened to 11 days from 15, and deaths decreased to 8% from 11% in the study.
I guess some help is better than none, but IMHO it is far from what is needed. Definatley not a jump up and down moment.
Remdesivir
It acts like Tamiflu... it doesn't cure but it drastically shortens the hospital stay (severity). That will mean less pressure on hospitals, medical staff, and equipment (average hospital stay is over 10 days.)
It'll shorten the heck out of medical bills!
originally posted by: drussell41
My husband read something in the Daily Mail that children are getting hit hard with a new mutation of it.
originally posted by: carewemust
Some form of Hydroxychloroquine-based treatment is the safest (and least expensive) way forward. Big pharma and affiliated crooks don't like HCQ, which is a good sign!
originally posted by: buddha
This on Fox news.
ER doctors now [say] 'It's interesting when I'm writing about my death report, I'm being pressured to add COVID. Why is that?
well every one knows now!
lets just hope some thing comes of this.
originally posted by: tanstaafl
originally posted by: drussell41
My husband read something in the Daily Mail that children are getting hit hard with a new mutation of it.
It is rare - which likely means the children have substantial pre-existing conditions - and, more importantly, there is no proof it is caused by the virus.
But some people cannot let facts get in the way of their fear-mongering.
originally posted by: tanstaafl
originally posted by: carewemust
Some form of Hydroxychloroquine-based treatment is the safest (and least expensive) way forward. Big pharma and affiliated crooks don't like HCQ, which is a good sign!
Actually, high dose IV Vitamin C is much safer, and much cheaper - and yes, much more effective at stopping the cytokine storm and bringing patients at deaths door back from the edge.
originally posted by: tanstaafl
originally posted by: drussell41
My husband read something in the Daily Mail that children are getting hit hard with a new mutation of it.
It is rare - which likely means the children have substantial pre-existing conditions - and, more importantly, there is no proof it is caused by the virus.
But some people cannot let facts get in the way of their fear-mongering.
I went to Daily Mail and looked for the article you mentioned but didn't see it, did you post a link? I found the article below about deaths in the US "start rising faster again with two consecutive days of more than 2,000 deaths" though, and it seems relevant, so I'll post the link, and the graph so you can see it without having to visit the website:
originally posted by: drussell41
Did you even run down and read the Daily Mail article? I didn't because I refuse to remove adblocker. I simply posted the info so that others could research it further if they wished.
There is something odd about these financial times graphs, at least for the US curve. The daily deaths in the US are very "spikey" and a 7 day rolling average smooths them out a little, but not as much as that graph shows for the US, which looks very smooth.
originally posted by: MonkeyBalls2
Financial Times Graphs, more at the link.
Some were updated earlier than usual.
originally posted by: Arbitrageur
I went to Daily Mail and looked for the article you mentioned but didn't see it, did you post a link? I found the article below about deaths in the US "start rising faster again with two consecutive days of more than 2,000 deaths" though, and it seems relevant, so I'll post the link, and the graph so you can see it without having to visit the website:
originally posted by: drussell41
Did you even run down and read the Daily Mail article? I didn't because I refuse to remove adblocker. I simply posted the info so that others could research it further if they wished.
After unrealistic looking downward drops in deaths on 4/26 and 4/27, the deaths in the US have jumped way back up on 4/28 and 4/29 though not as high as the previous peak levels. But I think there must be something going on in the reporting causing these mid-week spikes. I doubt the actual daily death rates jump up and down by this large a magnitude, as seen here, though the total numbers may be OK and the rolling averages should help smooth the data:
US coronavirus deaths pass Trump's 'best case' scenario of 60,000 and start rising faster again with two consecutive days of more than 2,000 deaths
I suspect there's some kind of timing issue in how the deaths are getting reported, and there seems to be a roughly weekly pattern to the peaks and valleys.
There is something odd about these financial times graphs, at least for the US curve. The daily deaths in the US are very "spikey" and a 7 day rolling average smooths them out a little, but not as much as that graph shows for the US, which looks very smooth.
originally posted by: MonkeyBalls2
Financial Times Graphs, more at the link.
Some were updated earlier than usual.
Here's the data from ourworldindata.org plotted as daily deaths, and 7 day rolling average. The start and end dates may be different to the FT example, so I'm only comparing the overall shapes of the graphs. The 7 day average graph below, and the Financial Times 7-day average graph shouldn't have completely different shapes, but they do, which seems odd. See how the 7-day average graph below is not so smooth? But both 7 day averages were hovering in the vicinity of 2000 deaths per day so at least that much is consistent.
COVID-19 Deaths in US - Daily
COVID-19 Deaths in US - 7-Day rolling Average