It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: asabuvsobelow
Jay it's safe to say it's been proven that our " Quarantine " did very little to nothing .
originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
originally posted by: vonclod
originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
originally posted by: proximo
originally posted by: conspiracy nut
a reply to: carewemust
The problem is some of those people could be asymptomatic and unwittingly spreading it and because of their recklessness people that are immunocompromised and the elderly would be in grave danger.
Imagine how much quicker we could flatten the curve if people could follow the advice of doctors and scientists instead of blowhards like Trump who if it were up to him would have everybody acting like there is nothing to worry about.
Look at Boris Johnson who was bragging about continuing to shake hands and not adhering to social distancing, he is in intensive care with the virus as we speak.
Trump has never said it is nothing to worry about. If anything he is way way too convinced it is super deadly.
Incorrect.
Wow, what an extraordinary example of denial..crazy.
The thread title should be "Selfish assholes unite"
It seems to be a fairly consistent mindset amongst a certain segment of society.
originally posted by: Navieko
originally posted by: asabuvsobelow
Jay it's safe to say it's been proven that our " Quarantine " did very little to nothing .
Dude you've got a long way to climb in the intellectual department if you think "it's been proven" that the social-distancing and strict isolation methods used around the World haven't been effective. If you want to claim something is well and truly "proven" you're going to need to bring forth a little more than just your own unintelligible rambling... have any links to published studies or at least articles that support your claim? I hope you didn't think we'd just take your word for it.
There's way more actual verifiable evidence that indicates it's not only working, it's working very well and faster than initially expected (at least in places where the great majority aren't selfish idiots). Yes the virus is very infectious and is able to spread to the far reaches of the planet, all it takes is 1 person. That's just more proof the strict "quarantining" was/is necessary.
originally posted by: JAGStorm
a reply to: asabuvsobelow
I know three people that have died. I know one in critical condition and one with mild symptoms. Two that died were younger than me. I’m not chancing anything, staying home.
originally posted by: Rob808
It’s quite plain to see looking at these charts (assuming all data is accurate and there’s no manipulation of any kind taking place) that this is not the correct response for such a benign virus.
originally posted by: Navieko
a reply to: asabuvsobelow
I'm not making the outlandish claims and proof of what I'm saying is available everywhere on any of the tracker sites where you can see a break down of the numbers and time frames in various forms (charts, graphs, tables, etc). Your claim that the entire planet is flattening out at the same time is simply not true -- and that's what I'm asking proof for. Have you actually looked closely at the graphs, such as the ones that 'MonkeyBalls2' posts every day on the 'Updates' thread?
www.ft.com...
Different nations are at very different stages, some are still climbing steeply, some are just starting to show signs they're leveling off, while others are clearly on the down slope. It all depends on when the outbreak really started for them, how long it took for them to implement strict social distancing measures (and exactly what measures were taken), and how effectively their populations are following the rules. Not to mention a whole range of other factors such as population density, state of their medical system, etc.
What is plainly obvious to anyone who looks at the graphs/charts, is that there is a clear and obvious trend that sets in after a certain amount of time from when the strict measures were ordered/enforced/followed.
originally posted by: Navieko
originally posted by: Rob808
It’s quite plain to see looking at these charts (assuming all data is accurate and there’s no manipulation of any kind taking place) that this is not the correct response for such a benign virus.
No, it's quite plain to see looking at these charts that the strict social distancing rules/lockdowns have been effective in mitigating what could have been a far deadlier virus than the flu, had nothing been done.
So far, no transmission of the virus in supermarkets, restaurants or hairdressers has been proven," explained Bonn virologist Hendrik Streeck on the ZDF Markus Lanz talk show.
originally posted by: daskakik
a reply to: RadioRobert
There are sobriety checkpoints.
Just saying.