Civil War 2 ?

originally posted by: contextual

originally posted by: seeker1963
a reply to: JAGStorm


We are in a cold civil war as we speak. A coup is already happening trying to get rid of a sitting president by a group whom have been very open about their agenda to have him removed from office the second it was announced he was the winner of the election over Hillary Clinton.

It will go hot when and if they are successful in removing this President from office.

If you kept up with events, there isn't a coup, just a very stupid president.
trump asked Russia to hack Hillary's emails on live TV, and we all know what happened next.

the DNC servers got hacked, which shows you start off wrong, why listen any further?

You do know the DNC server and Hillary's server are not the same?

Suprise suprise suprise.

🕵️‍♀️👀🕵️‍♀️👀😊😊

a reply to: JAGStorm

No it would be very ugly. It would be tactical guerilla warfare with specific targets. The msm would label it terrorist, portions of the armed forces would likely attempt coups as well. If it got to that more than likely what would happen is a convention of states and a reset with remnants of the old guard trying to defend their power and the new government fighting back.

Jaden

a reply to: underwerks

You realize we're called upon to do exactly that, and that's exactly how we were formed?

Useful idiot? Maybe you need to look in the mirror.

Jaden

a reply to: Masterjaden

and everyone and there brother racing for the different weapons platforms.

would the "football" be punted?


The US of A would just be too good of a target.

"the winner gets the spoils" as it were.

a reply to: underwerks

Yeah because only one side cares about the Constitution and keeping our rights in tact and aren't such pussies that they won't do something when the usurpation of authority becomes too great.

Jaden

originally posted by: Masterjaden
a reply to: underwerks

You realize we're called upon to do exactly that, and that's exactly how we were formed?

Useful idiot? Maybe you need to look in the mirror.

Jaden

To do exactly what? Kill other Americans because they're following the constitution?

I don't think it's me who needs a little self reflection.

a reply to: thedigirati

Nope, even in a civil war there isn't a country that would risk attacking the USA. Besides, any country that might want to relies too heavily on our money to do anything as they would be dealing with their own problems.

Jaden

a reply to: underwerks

That's the thing the left hasn't even pretended to follow the Constitution for several years.

Jaden

originally posted by: ketsuko

originally posted by: underwerks
a reply to: JinMI

It has become crystal clear what "side" condones offense and which condones defense.

I only see one side threatening the other with civil war.

And the side they threaten is the one pushing socialism and gun confiscation which are both policies of naked totalitarian force and antithetical to the COTUS.

Are you really going to support the killing of Americans because of right wing propaganda? No one is taking your guns. What you guys call socialism isn't close to actual socialism, the literal definition or otherwise.

You're using lies and hyperbole to justify killing people.

originally posted by: Masterjaden
a reply to: underwerks

That's the thing the left hasn't even pretended to follow the Constitution for several years.

Jaden

Please show me how the impeachment process isn't constitutional.

a reply to: underwerks

I didn't mention impeachment. But since you mention it. The left has shown that they will do anything to oust this president. They suck at it, but boy are they trying.

If what they've brought forward thus far ends in Trump's removal from office, it is a coup not an impeachment.

Jaden

a reply to: Masterjaden

If what they've brought forward thus far ends in Trump's removal from office, it is a coup not an impeachment.

Why do you view a provision in the constitution, written by the founders as a way to avoid civil war, as an act of war?

I'm seriously trying to figure out why all of a sudden people on the right are viewing following the constitution as an act of war.

a reply to: underwerks

the "OPTICS" of this will be awesome for the Republicans.

BOOM!!

but hey no worries

im🍑 away

Carry on.

a reply to: underwerks

Because these are the same people that scream when democratic candidates talk about gun bans but don’t even blink when a sitting President says he’s in favor of taking the guns first and worrying about due process second, then follows that up with calls for red flag laws.

Flexibility is paramount.

originally posted by: underwerks
a reply to: Masterjaden

If what they've brought forward thus far ends in Trump's removal from office, it is a coup not an impeachment.

Why do you view a provision in the constitution, written by the founders as a way to avoid civil war, as an act of war?

I'm seriously trying to figure out why all of a sudden people on the right are viewing following the constitution as an act of war.

that is why your flawed, it's not what you are doing, it is how you are doing it.

impeachment through hearsay, yea not really constitutional, but go ahead.

(not to mention ethical, but OMB)

not like the last 7 Strozk out at bat have worked out so well.

Keep the chin strap tight.

originally posted by: Shamrock6
a reply to: underwerks

Because these are the same people that scream when democratic candidates talk about gun bans but don’t even blink when a sitting President says he’s in favor of taking the guns first and worrying about due process second, then follows that up with calls for red flag laws.

Flexibility is paramount.

you do make a Great point, it's a shame that the im🍑ment "inquiry" will hold up all legislation for the next month.

Kinda makes your point moot if nothing can be done.😲😲😲😲

Carry on. 👋👌👋👌

( some folks are not one policy voters too.)🐱‍👤🤹‍♀️🐱‍👤🤹‍♀️🥇😁

originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
a reply to: shooterbrody

The movie was released in 2016, I didn't say anythin about it proving my point, not sure why you would think so, I just pointed out the "coincidence". Lots of those in the media and Hollywood these days.

Now go into the Q thread and pat your friends on the back for their crazy conspiracy theories you hypocrite. 😋

Ahahaha
The movie
The movie
Ahahaha

Its a "coincidence "

Ahahahaha
Aaaahahahahaha

What a lousy joke.
"It was the movie"

a reply to: thedigirati

Kinda makes your point moot if nothing can be done.

Since the point is that some people scream about things when one “side” does it but not the other, no it’s really not moot at all.

What you said, however, is completely irrelevant and moot, yes.

a reply to: JAGStorm

One of the main problems is that things are not as clear cut as 1861. We are dealing with a convoluted mess.

If you have seen the 2016 red/blue voting map then you know that the split is not across state lines but is split by county. Even that outlook has defects. For example, you can say that Los Angeles County is Democrat, but there are millions of people in the county who voted Trump. No state lines mean no state succession. Even if a state like California left the country, it could have internal warfare among its citizens. How much destruction is questionable, depending on how long it last.

But would we even have a controlled war or just an uprising? What would become of the states military if there was succession? Would the National Guard take over? Even that would be a mess, because, like nationwide, the majority of enlisted men are Democratic, while nearly all the commanders are Republican. So just to go to war, you’ll have a mess right there to begin with.

And Who is going to war against Who? Most of the Democratic Party heads in the state would not live through it, as they would be among the first targets. So too that group of actors and screen personalities who have shot their mouth off for the last two years. All of these people who are known by sight would be the first victims. Then what, people who speak Spanish? Because unless you are hiding behind an Antifa mask, the lines are not that obvious. Sure, they could blow up the New York Slimes building, the Washington Compost, Fox News and CNN. But then what?

So an outright civil war like with tanks and helicopters seems unlikely; it would probably be more like mass riots.

Remember, even Billy and his cum hither blue dress was impeached, and he was still President for another few years.

But if a crooked Democratic government removes the leader that half the country voted for, without even a blue dress involved, then the whole meaning of voting is falsified. Then you have real, long lasting problems. Because then the political system has failed.