Atlantis has been discovered?!

a reply to: fromunclexcommunicate

The copper mine just proves there was tool making material in the form of easy to mine surface deposits and silica flux from the desert sand.

All the minerals described to be in the Ringed City, Atlantis, are present in the region.
But, the vast amounts of sand, were not. They were added as part of the destruction, concealment effort. The tan colored sand is ocean sand. The native sands are a darker color, less abundant, and natural. The fact is, this ocean sand is natural on the bottom of the ocean, and a certain distance from beaches or zones. This ocean sand is unnatural in its location (Sahara).

Well, science demands a answer as to how it got there. Again, it starts with the observation. "Ocean sand, where it shouldn't be". Amazingly our present "Academia" can not answer this question because the answer lays in multiple disciplines that by their very nature preclude them from combining to reach the answer. The whole of the present scientific community are not driven by the love of truth, but of monetary gain (with notable exceptions). The whole of the community has been corrupted, and controlled.

The truth can only be acquired by breaking free of the "Institutional Box" that has been carefully thought out to contain the mind, not free it. Free thinkers will find the truth. In the most simplest terms, the sand, was put there! And it is the greatest part of the story, untold.

"Seven Days In May", "Steve Wozniak", "remote viewing"? I'll leave it at that.

originally posted by: Quadrivium
a reply to: All Seeing Eye
In my opinion, you should start another thread. Part 2, to share this.
Very interesting.

PM me with your thoughts

originally posted by: cooperton

originally posted by: Hanslune

Yeah, you need an accredited research or educational organization willing to put their name on your expedition.

Unfortunately I don't think they'd do that is I am assuming you have no academic standing and lack large amounts of cash (for large amounts of cash they would make you the sponsor and send their own team if they thought the site had any potential).

Your best move is to find those who are currently working on Mauritanian archaeology and see if there is a site near your site that they could satellite off (add to their control). As to how you will obtain the money for this grants/funding for Mauritania is hard to get with their present government and terrorist problem not to mention Covid.

Mauritania is in the 'French sector' so France is the best place to seek funding and archaeological organizations that might be helpful. However, you will have to tell them - with extreme details - why you want their support and money to do X

Good luck

It's pretty rare to even meet someone who even knows Mauritania exists haha... the people there are great and I never felt unsafe at any point. It's a shame it gets such bad publicity. I'm sure bad stuff happens there, but bad stuff also happens everywhere.

I was hoping to sponsor in some way, I was going to put most of my savings into paying the right people and getting the right equipment. but yeah its nearly impossible to successfully pitch an Atlantis expedition to academia lol. It's as though their ears turn off the moment you mention Atlantis. Oh well.

That's a good idea with reaching out to the French. I will give it a go.

I worked on and off in the Middle-east from 1983 to 2011. I hired a number of Mauratanians when I worked in Bahrain and Dubai. My wife lived in and traveled around West Africa for many years.

Mauratania was a safe place until about twenty years ago.

travel.state.gov...

The government of Mauritania designates certain areas off-limits to foreigners and most Mauritanians. These “No Movement Zones” are extremely dangerous due to their proximity to Mali, where armed groups engaged in an active insurgency carry out cross-border attacks into Mauritania. The government of Mauritania does not maintain a substantial presence in these areas and thus police are unable to respond to most incidents there. In addition, cell phone coverage and paved roads are nonexistent. U.S. officials are unable to travel to these places. Since the boundaries of such areas frequently change, U.S. citizens should pay attention to all posted signs and notices of restricted entry. They should presume the following areas are off-limits:

All areas north of the Tropic of Cancer
All areas east of 08⁰ longitude (West of Greenwich) situated within 100km of the Mali Border

Atlantis expeditions have a 100% failure rate over the last two centuries. You might be able to get funding from fringe organizations but they are tight fisted.

Oh, and don't lead with the sigma declaration I'm not sure you understand what that actually means.

Nevertheless good luck and don't forget to go 'armed' with actual people who know how to conduct an excavation and especially how to document it.

They should just not call it "Atlantis". Say they are interested in the Green Sahara, and believe an advanced (but unnamed) civilization may have flourished in this area.

Or maybe devise a name for it, like "Ringland", or "Gentle River". Something totally not Atlantis.

Later on you can suggest that maybe this city helped give rise to the myth.

originally posted by: All Seeing Eye
a reply to: fromunclexcommunicate

The copper mine just proves there was tool making material in the form of easy to mine surface deposits and silica flux from the desert sand.

All the minerals described to be in the Ringed City, Atlantis, are present in the region.
But, the vast amounts of sand, were not. They were added as part of the destruction, concealment effort. The tan colored sand is ocean sand. The native sands are a darker color, less abundant, and natural. The fact is, this ocean sand is natural on the bottom of the ocean, and a certain distance from beaches or zones. This ocean sand is unnatural in its location (Sahara).

Well, science demands a answer as to how it got there. Again, it starts with the observation. "Ocean sand, where it shouldn't be". Amazingly our present "Academia" can not answer this question because the answer lays in multiple disciplines that by their very nature preclude them from combining to reach the answer. The whole of the present scientific community are not driven by the love of truth, but of monetary gain (with notable exceptions). The whole of the community has been corrupted, and controlled.

It is a weird semi-volcanic formation. Wouldn't that help to explain the difference in geology?

The truth can only be acquired by breaking free of the "Institutional Box" that has been carefully thought out to contain the mind, not free it. Free thinkers will find the truth. In the most simplest terms, the sand, was put there! And it is the greatest part of the story, untold.

"Seven Days In May", "Steve Wozniak", "remote viewing"? I'll leave it at that.

The purpose of Archaeology, from the perspective of those who fund it, is to reinforce the social hierarchy. For many of those who participate, the whole reason they took the job was so they could rub shoulders with aristocrats, and be thought of as important like them.

Findings that don't reinforce the current world's social hierarchy are accordingly, unpopular.

a reply to: bloodymarvelous

They should just not call it "Atlantis". Say they are interested in the Green Sahara, and believe an advanced (but unnamed) civilization may have flourished in this area.

Academia has already coined the society as the "Tichett Culture"


This region includes a long sandstone cliff formation that defines the northern limit of the Hodh depression, near the former lake of Aoukar.[1]

The medieval trading settlement at Tichit is now a UNESCO World Heritage Site.

The Neolithic site of Dhar Tichitt in this area was settled by agropastoral communities around 2000 BC.[2] Their settlements were generally situated on the cliffs and included stone building. These are the oldest surviving archaeological settlements in West Africa and the oldest of all stone base settlements south of the Sahara. They are thought to have been built by the Soninke people and were possibly the precursor of the Ghana empire.[3][4][5] The area was abandoned around 500 BC probably because of the onset of more arid conditions. Hundreds of rock art images have been discovered, depicting various animals and hunting scenes.[6] Archaeologists including P.J. Munson, Augustin F.C. Holl, and S. Amblard have found some evidence that millet was farmed seasonally as early as 2000 BC.

But again, the ruins run further north and quite large. Plus, the road network that ties much of it together. They are intentionally downplaying the size of this culture. I cant believe the "Archeologists" involved in researching this area are so Lazar focused on one site, to overlook, the entire region. I refuse to believe I am the first to discover the road network and the vast number of settlements. It must be, selective blindness..

It is a weird semi-volcanic formation. Wouldn't that help to explain the difference in geology?

As I tried to share, the sand has been added, and is not native. The Rings themselves, I believe, are a product of the newly formed planet that is going from molten to plastic state, where gasses are bubbling out of the crust. Molten rock is involved but not a traditional action of a volcano. There are two other examples of these "Bubble" formations, not as perfect as the "Eye" at 22°15'36.51"N 24°42'13.53"E and 21°56'8.36"N 24°54'48.99"E



Think Mud Bubbles on a very large scale.

The purpose of Archaeology, from the perspective of those who fund it, is to reinforce the social hierarchy. For many of those who participate, the whole reason they took the job was so they could rub shoulders with aristocrats, and be thought of as important like them.

Findings that don't reinforce the current world's social hierarchy are accordingly, unpopular.

I can't argue with your point of view as it is part of the problem. Its kind of like "Mr Smith goes to Washington". The best well intended do something with the right intentions, until they get there and see the depth of the lies and corruption involved. They must choose between following their heart, or follow the crowd. In the past great discoveries were not discovered by the group. It was always the person that took "The Road Less Traveled".

It isn't just the field of Archeology but all institutions that have been corrupted. And, I believe, the core of the corruption is actually tied, to the Ringed City. And now with the pending discovery of the Ringed City people may start to question the other subjects Plato described. I go deeper into this corruption in another thread.

The Anunnaki and the Matrix of Lies. The Missing Links

The truth, is unpopular, in a world of, lies... And the Ancient gods, are frightened to death, of it.

a reply to: Hanslune

Back in 1986 I worked for a government contractor and participated in some of the employer group interview/group solve puzzle activities. There was some secret sauce that involved Mauritania but armed disinfo actors pretending to be naive to offer a believable cover story if anyone moved the group too close to the truth. The truthers later lost their access to the classified space technology and the customer the covert group was responsible for. Of course 90% of the people in the group solve puzzle couldn't read so they passed and could participate in that compartment safely.

originally posted by: fromunclexcommunicate
a reply to: Hanslune

Back in 1986 I worked for a government contractor and participated in some of the employer group interview/group solve puzzle activities. There was some secret sauce that involved Mauritania but armed disinfo actors pretending to be naive to offer a believable cover story if anyone moved the group too close to the truth. The truthers later lost their access to the classified space technology and the customer the covert group was responsible for. Of course 90% of the people in the group solve puzzle couldn't read so they passed and could participate in that compartment safely.

Not sure what you are referring too? Are you commenting on the actions of the Polisario Front? The war against Morocco take over of western Sahara after Spain withdrew?

a reply to: All Seeing Eye

Excellent OP and I had run across this youtube channel myself and watched concerning this location for Atlantis.

It is persuasive and it may well be the case.

I came across something that might just be of interest to you that discusses the fate of the region now known as the Sahara Desert:
www.youtube.com...

originally posted by: bloodymarvelous

Findings that don't reinforce the current world's social hierarchy are accordingly, unpopular.

Hmmmm, how exactly did Catalhuyuck, Golbekli Tepe and other recent finds 'reinforce the current world's social hierarchy''?(what by the way is that? The cultures in Saudi Arabia, Nepal, China, Norway and Panama are not particularly similar)

What does do that, what kind of finds are unpopular and to 'who''?

I would also note that their is no world archaeological hierarchy. We know what those look like (a government controlled archaeology/anthropology body) as the Soviets had one and the Chinese still do and a few other authoritative governments also.

a reply to: Hanslune

Hmmmm, how exactly did Catalhuyuck, Golbekli Tepe and other recent finds 'reinforce the current world's social hierarchy''?(what by the way is that? The cultures in Saudi Arabia, Nepal, China, Norway and Panama are not particularly similar)

What crosses over all borders, all religions, all races, all cultures?

Archeologists would never see it. Geologists would never see it. Biologists would never see it. Etc Etc Etc. But, Historians working independently, might, see it. There is another institution that via its tentacles manipulates from the shadows. And anything that would expose where those tentacles lead, will be stricken.

UNESCO has been completely corrupted. Read up on it.

originally posted by: TonyS
a reply to: All Seeing Eye

Excellent OP and I had run across this youtube channel myself and watched concerning this location for Atlantis.

It is persuasive and it may well be the case.

I came across something that might just be of interest to you that discusses the fate of the region now known as the Sahara Desert:
www.youtube.com...

Thank you for your input, contribution. But to be honest, nothing really new to me. Though point on when it describes the African Humid Period (AHP) I definitely disagree with the mechanization's of the causes for it. They also include "Non Science" in the information I also disagree with. The cave art confirms that the AHP was real. It also sets the timeline for any and all large communities to have existed in the area. Especially ones that made their buildings with Mud Bricks. No plentiful water supply's, no mud bricks...

originally posted by: All Seeing Eye
a reply to: Hanslune

Hmmmm, how exactly did Catalhuyuck, Golbekli Tepe and other recent finds 'reinforce the current world's social hierarchy''?(what by the way is that? The cultures in Saudi Arabia, Nepal, China, Norway and Panama are not particularly similar)

What crosses over all borders, all religions, all races, all cultures?

Archeologists would never see it. Geologists would never see it. Biologists would never see it. Etc Etc Etc. But, Historians working independently, might, see it. There is another institution that via its tentacles manipulates from the shadows. And anything that would expose where those tentacles lead, will be stricken.

UNESCO has been completely corrupted. Read up on it.

So basically you have nothing then? I've been studying fringe subjects for 50+ years and in my experience and knowledge there are no vast conspiracies.

When someone says this type of conspiracy thick sentence which in the end says nothing, 'There is another institution that via its tentacles manipulates from the shadows. And anything that would expose where those tentacles lead, will be stricken.' Please show how any archaeology site is going to 'Threaten them". Them who?

originally posted by: All Seeing Eye


UNESCO has been completely corrupted. Read up on it.

Right.
Because they don't support Tartaria, mudfloods and the Richat Structure as Atlantis.

Harte

This image was given to someone I know who travelled to the Richat recently:

ibb.co...

Sadly, he did not investigate further. The image was probably taken in an area similar to this:

ibb.co...

Very mysterious geology.

a reply to: Hanslune

So basically you have nothing then? I've been studying fringe subjects for 50+ years and in my experience and knowledge there are no vast conspiracies.

Then you didn't dig deep enough, or, you choose not to see.

I suppose you think the Biden Administration is giving the American people a "Square Deal" lol lol

originally posted by: Harte

originally posted by: All Seeing Eye


UNESCO has been completely corrupted. Read up on it.

Right.
Because they don't support Tartaria, mudfloods and the Richat Structure as Atlantis.

Harte

A private memo obtained by the Guardian shows that two French cabinet ministers have intervened directly with the secretariat of Unesco to ensure that former presidential aides would be given cushy senior positions in the Paris-based UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation.

Such cronyism reaches into almost every corner of Unesco, according to young professionals who despair of salvaging the organisation they work for. Nepotism is also rife, they say, after watching well-paid jobs go to mistresses and family members.

Leaked documents reveal extent of Unesco corruption

He is not the first president to turn his back on the organization. In 1984, President Ronald Reagan withdrew from UNESCO, citing corruption, mismanagement and a pro-Soviet bias. President George H.W. Bush directed the U.S. to rejoin in 1992, hoping it would foster better international cooperation.

It didn’t. The mismanagement of the organization, which the U.S. was dunned $80 million a year to support, continued.

Editorial: Good riddance to UNESCO

Years ago, I published an investigation into Pasha Holding, identifying it as a company owned by the daughter of Azerbaijan’s president, Ilham Aliyev. Later, one of my colleagues at Radio Free Europe published a video story on the firm’s destruction of part of the ancient city wall of Baku to clear space for the construction of a Four Seasons hotel. The project destroyed not only part of the city wall, but also more than a dozen of architecturally significant buildings. When construction crews found an ancient tunnel, rather than having archaeologists excavate and document the site to preserve it as part of the city’s history, they simply filled it with cement.

When UNESCO’s Director General Broke Her Silence

The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) fell from grace at astounding speed. From being touted as the Obama administration’s “global partner” in globalizing education just a few years ago, to facing a massive financial crisis and even a U.S. government exit today under President Trump, UNESCO is on track to become a byword for globalist corruption and tyranny. It also offers Americans a powerful example of how easy it is to restore ceded U.S. sovereignty and crush globalist schemes that undermine liberty, morality, self-government, and common sense. Israel also announced its departure. Now, it is time to focus on the broader United Nations.

U.S. Exits Corrupt, Communist-led UNESCO

Freemasonry and UNESCO's Executive Board

You have some reading to do. Well, if you cared about the truth. UNESCO runs Mauritania!

The catastrophic events that the Earth has been involved in over its 4 Billion year history are probably a thousand times more numerous than what we have been able to discover. Some will never be discovered because the destruction was so great that they resurfaced the entire planet miles deep. We can take our pick of Earthquakes, Asteroid strikes, SuperVolcanic explosions , CME's and most likely the occasional blast waves of Supernova of stars near us.

The telltale clues are in the non-conformities of the planets geologic strata in every area of the globe. These are absent layers of Earth geology since the Earth solidified from a molten fireball. We are talking thousands and millions of years of random gaps upon random gaps in the strata. Permanently erased history. One can only imagine this kind of destruction.

Some of these non-conformities are caused by land subduction and resurfacing and the effects of ocean and wind driven erosion but most are just missing strata of time that we can never explain.

When you grasp that fact, then events like what caused what ever occupied the Richat structure to be scoured away are small in comparison to what we have no idea about. Events that could remove 10 miles of crust globally... Think of all of the civilizations that could have been here on Earth at one time or another, and we would not have a clue.

We know these things happened so why is there so much negative adversity when our scientists publish evidence that suggests this? In the order of things, the Dinosaur killer 65 million years ago, probably pales in comparison to many of the previous catastrophes we will never know about.

Perhaps you might want to start by reading this.

link.springer.com... 82c&utm_campaign=CONR_BOOKS_ECOM_GL_PHSS_ALWYS_DEEPLINK&utm_content=textlink&utm_term=PID100357191&?utm_medium=affiliate

originally posted by: dragonridr
Perhaps you might want to start by reading this.

link.springer.com... 82c&utm_campaign=CONR_BOOKS_ECOM_GL_PHSS_ALWYS_DEEPLINK&utm_content=textlink&utm_term=PID100357191&?utm_medium=affiliate

Not only does he not want to read that, he will consciously and studiously avoid reading that.

Harte

originally posted by: Harte

originally posted by: dragonridr
Perhaps you might want to start by reading this.

link.springer.com... 82c&utm_campaign=CONR_BOOKS_ECOM_GL_PHSS_ALWYS_DEEPLINK&utm_content=textlink&utm_term=PID100357191&?utm_medium=affiliate

Not only does he not want to read that, he will consciously and studiously avoid reading that.

Harte

If you are finished with your deflection, (a simple term inferring a wish not to consider) you might want to reconsider your position that UNESCO is not full of corruption. Now, what are your thoughts concerning UNESCO.

dragonridr concerns will be addressed in a reply to him, not you.