It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Don't see why not. She should have enough contacts to get people in Mauritania to help get the firman for a site if one was identified. That kind of thing saves you months and months of wrong turns.
originally posted by: All Seeing Eye
Now that you brought up the "Caravans" and requiring stops, you just have to wonder. Show me other examples of this design along those caravan routs, and, why would they build two of them just 5 miles apart? And two of them, just 2 miles apart? You would think they knew the routs rather well. 2 miles, 5 miles a day?
Possibly because the wells dried up... as they do, you know.
In this case, without being able to go to the area and talk with the people and check historical records, all one can say is that there are two structures that are two miles apart. We don't know when they were made or if they're contemporary with each other and if they were built in the past 80 years or not. The design is consistent with animal pens used and built in the area. you've already shown us satellite photos of farm houses that are currently inhabited and producing crops and which have this same type and size of boundary fencing on the property.
And since I don't know the caravan routes, I'm not really sure if these are animal pens for caravans. It has been mentioned by others as a possibility and I accept that some of them may indeed be that.
I don't believe I have, at least in the area of the Eye. As we both have stated in the past its going to require "Boots on the Ground" to get any conformation.
you've already shown us satellite photos of farm houses that are currently inhabited and producing crops and which have this same type and size of boundary fencing on the property.
True. So how do these "Other People" know what these are? Going back again to, there is nothing in the history books to compare to, or argue against. So "Animal pens" is only a possibility, but low probability considering there are no observable sources for water. The distance between the structures would be a great consideration, especially since there is no infrastructure one might expect to see considering the volume of traffic that would be involved. There are no observable sources of food for the livestock to eat while in these "Pens".
And since I don't know the caravan routes, I'm not really sure if these are animal pens for caravans
Please point to your examples.
The design is consistent with animal pens used and built in the area.
And since I don't know the caravan routes, I'm not really sure if these are animal pens for caravans. It has been mentioned by others as a possibility and I accept that some of them may indeed be that.
originally posted by: All Seeing Eye
When it comes to the Subject of Plato's Atlantis there are two primary possibilities. One, it is just a myth, and as you know, there is no possible evidence that can be found to support it. Or Two, the story is based in some type of truth, where evidence can be found to support the the truths that might be contained. As an extension to the second there is the possibility that there is a "Priesthood" who work not to enlighten the reality of Plato's Atlantis, but to conceal it, and even distort and or disguise that evidence. Its up to each individual to assign the probabilities to the above.
"The tale, which was of great length, began as follows: I have before remarked, in speaking of the allotments of the gods, that they distributed the whole earth into portions differing in extent, and made themselves temples and sacrifices. And Poseidon(Enki), receiving for his lot the island of Atlantis, begat children by a mortal woman, and settled them in a part of the island which I will proceed to describe.
originally posted by: All Seeing Eye
"During my recent exploration of the Richat Structure I was looking for megaliths. This is the only stone I found that could possibly be a cut and carved block weighing several tons. It has a rectangular shape, relatively smooth, flat surfaces on all sides and equal proportions." 1 1/2 min
originally posted by: AndyMayhew
originally posted by: All Seeing Eye
"During my recent exploration of the Richat Structure I was looking for megaliths. This is the only stone I found that could possibly be a cut and carved block weighing several tons. It has a rectangular shape, relatively smooth, flat surfaces on all sides and equal proportions." 1 1/2 min
And that was the only stone he found that "could" have been cut by humans (and clearly, to my geologist eyes, was not - I willing to stake my life on it).
So that's it. All that remains of Atlantis is one single (uncut) stone
originally posted by: ADAMandEVIL
a reply to: All Seeing Eye
Let me begin by observing first of all, that nine thousand was the sum of years which had elapsed since the war which was said to have taken place between those who dwelt outside the Pillars of Heracles and all who dwelt within them; this war I am going to describe. Of the combatants on the one side, the city of Athens was reported to have been the leader and to have fought out the war; the combatants on the other side were commanded by the kings of Atlantis, which, as was saying, was an island greater in extent than Libya and Asia, and when afterwards sunk by an earthquake, became an impassable barrier of mud to voyagers sailing from hence to any part of the ocean. The progress of the history will unfold the various nations of barbarians and families of Hellenes which then existed, as they successively appear on the scene; but I must describe first of all Athenians of that day, and their enemies who fought with them, and then the respective powers and governments of the two kingdoms. Let us give the precedence to Athens.
If Atlantis were in the Sahara, and Atlantis sunk after an earthquake, then the Sahara would have once been an ocean.
Unless, what if it sank not into water, but into the sand? An impassable barrier of mud.
A flood plus sand would make lots of mud.
Imagine the immense history that would lay hidden under those sands if that were so!
A continent of ancient sites and artifacts and lost knowledge... amazing!
originally posted by: Harte
The place has been investigated twice.
Stone tools contemporary with Homo Erectus were found.
It was certainly not Atlantis, but whatever mental masturbation you prefer...
Harte
originally posted by: All Seeing Eye
originally posted by: Harte
The place has been investigated twice.
Stone tools contemporary with Homo Erectus were found.
It was certainly not Atlantis, but whatever mental masturbation you prefer...
Harte
So, what was the conclusion concerning these apparent buried structures? And, who was the authority that proclaims this isn't the Ringed City. You can leave your personal insults in your ego. No one has attempted to insult you.
zoom.earth...=21.120171,-11.27339,17z
If you don't like my characterization of this obsession of yours, try educating yourself on the site instead of squinting over little lumps in satellite and aerial photos.
It's not my fault that your motivations and actions here are transparent.
And who might have appointed you the speaker for all of mankind? How do you know what anyone thinks, are there secret meetings behind closed doors, where all these people decide what will be obvious and what isnt, and appoint you the spokesperson? For if there was, I was not invited. Oh wait, maybe I was, but I just cant bring myself to take a blood oath to a cause I have no knowledge of. I said no!
I just state what is obvious to everyone that knows anything about the subject.