We need to come to a conclusion on Bigfoot

🤣😂🤣

That’s some quality evidence and testimony right there!

originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed

originally posted by: Assassin82

originally posted by: 1point92AU

originally posted by: Sublimecraft
a reply to: Sabrechucker

Well, they're not native to any one particular country and their stories transcend generations of humans so there is something real and tangible, yet elusive, to it all.

IMO

Check this from last month............

Woman claims that Australia’s version of BIGFOOT tried to attack her

‘It was 7ft tall, growling and had hairy breasts’: Woman claims a YOWIE tried to attack her on a country road – before she fought it off with a cricket bat
Woman claims she saw a yowie on March 5 in Nimbin, New South Wales at 7pm
She claims she came across the mysterious creature after her cricket training
She was urinating behind some bushes when she heard a strange sound
The woman howled to see if a wild animal was hiding within behind the trees
Huge beast supposedly came running running toward her grunting and growling

Yowie is one of several names for an Australian folklore entity reputed to live in the Outback. The creature has its roots in Aboriginal oral history. In parts of Queensland, they are known as quinkin (or as a type of quinkin), and as joogabinna, in parts of New South Wales they are called Ghindaring, jurrawarra, myngawin, puttikan, doolaga, gulaga and thoolagal. Other names include yaroma, noocoonah, wawee, pangkarlangu, jimbra and tjangara. Yowie-type creatures are common in Aboriginal Australian legends, particularly in the eastern Australian states.

The yowie is usually described as a hairy and ape-like creature standing upright at between 2.1 m (6 ft 11 in) and 3.6 m (12 ft). The yowie's feet are described as much larger than a human's, but alleged yowie tracks are inconsistent in shape and toe number, and the descriptions of yowie foot and footprints provided by yowie witnesses are even more varied than those of bigfoot. The yowie's nose is described as wide and flat. Behaviourally, some report the yowie as timid or shy. Others describe the yowie as sometimes violent or aggressive.

en.wikipedia.org...

Good article. The irony is the deniers always clamor for "clear pictures" or "physical evidence". Even thought these are stock images they are part of the collection from the Yowie Research Group. So here we have both in the form of an exceptionally clear photo and a physical foot print. Now it could be a fake. There is always that possibility. However, my point is no matter what evidence is presented the deniers will always explain the evidence away.

People today are so galvanized with their belief system they close off their ability to grow and evolve.

There’s more evidence of a sponge who lived in a pineapple under the sea than there is of an actual, living and breathing Bigfoot.

Hours and hours of footage. It’s hard to believe, but I’ve seen the video. Gotta be true.

Please show that evidence of that sponge living in a pineapple under the sea.

originally posted by: 1point92AU

originally posted by: Assassin82

originally posted by: 1point92AU
a reply to: Assassin82

Plenty of physical evidence is available in the public realm. All you have to do is spend some time locating it. You just choose to ignore it based on bias.

So put it all together for us in one big, well-organized, scientifically proven thread. Gather all the evidence and state your case for Bigfoot that will systematically deny every common sense naysayer out there. I don’t have to prove something that isn’t scientifically proven or recognized as a species in the animal kingdom is real. The burden of proof is on those who claim otherwise. So put your money where your mouth is and prove us wrong.

Your problem is you've allowed yourself to be one of the sheep Hollywood produces through their mass social engineering propaganda. There's plenty of evidence that's been well documented by highly respected wildlife biologists. I would only point you to their research and findings. Go do the leg work yourself. Get some exercise.

So you can't prove it then? You can only make wild accusations about my sense of independent thinking and then direct me to go look for a unicorn in Narnia and trust everything I read and see despite the lack of any definitive proof?

Gotcha...I'll get right on that.

originally posted by: Assassin82

originally posted by: 1point92AU

originally posted by: Assassin82

originally posted by: 1point92AU
a reply to: Assassin82

So you can't prove it then? You can only make wild accusations about my sense of independent thinking and then direct me to go look for a unicorn in Narnia and trust everything I read and see despite the lack of any definitive proof?

LOL..you're clearly illustrating you possess anything BUT independent thinking. Instead you are exposing the success Hollywood and the mainstream media has had on sheep like you. The very definition of the word independent means "to be free from outside control". If you are so dead set on disbelief then please explain how exactly that makes you an "independent thinker". You're literally telling us you are controlled. That's the polar opposite of "independent".

You don't even see the hypocrisy of your very own words. You claim to know the absolute answer to a topic (which you cannot disprove) while I am informing you there are better (than me) and very highly qualified resources who are degreed individuals in the science of wildlife biology who have documented substantial evidence of the phenomena.

a reply to: 1point92AU

Here's a list of all known primates:

Source

Please, tell me which one is a Bigfoot?

I'm the one programmed by Hollywood yet you're the one on here spouting out nonsense about a mythical creature. You really can't make this stuff up.

originally posted by: Assassin82
a reply to: 1point92AU

Here's a list of all known primates:

Source

Please, tell me which one is a Bigfoot?

I'm the one programmed by Hollywood yet you're the one on here spouting out nonsense about a mythical creature. You really can't make this stuff up.

You continue to prove with each post how conditioned you are. You don't even realize it which, again, proves you are the perfect sheep.

The deniers in the world of UFOlogy spouted off the same conditioned jibberish for 60+ years and yet we now have active duty fighter pilots meeting with Congress to discuss the phenomena that the US Navy admits exist. Albeit they (US Navy) are undecided on classifying it as anything but an aerial phenomena the fact remains that for 60+ years Hollywood conditioned sheep like you to deny.

I'm not telling you to believe. I'm telling you to break out of your conditioned mind and objectively evaluate ALL information that is available from highly credible and highly respected sources. I.E. University professors and wildlife biologists. The stigma of the discussion and research of this topic needs to be removed in the same way the US Navy provided an open means for their active duty fighter pilots to make official reports without fear of repercussions.

originally posted by: 1point92AU

originally posted by: Assassin82
a reply to: 1point92AU

Here's a list of all known primates:

Source

Please, tell me which one is a Bigfoot?

I'm the one programmed by Hollywood yet you're the one on here spouting out nonsense about a mythical creature. You really can't make this stuff up.

You continue to prove with each post how conditioned you are. You don't even realize it which, again, proves you are the perfect sheep.

The deniers in the world of UFOlogy spouted off the same conditioned jibberish for 60+ years and yet we now have active duty fighter pilots meeting with Congress to discuss the phenomena that the US Navy admits exist. Albeit they (US Navy) are undecided on classifying it as anything but an aerial phenomena the fact remains that for 60+ years Hollywood conditioned sheep like you to deny.

I'm not telling you to believe. I'm telling you to break out of your conditioned mind and objectively evaluate ALL information that is available from highly credible and highly respected sources. I.E. University professors and wildlife biologists. The stigma of the discussion and research of this topic needs to be removed in the same way the US Navy provided an open means for their active duty fighter pilots to make official reports without fear of repercussions.

I get it. You keep telling me all these things that I am. Glad you know me better than I do. Yet, you have failed to even offer any evidence towards your position other than “to look it up yourself”.

If I were trying to prove that spongebob squad pants was real, I would at least post some evidence to support the data.

(Mods, can I change my name to “Hollywood”. Seems that’s the perfect username for me)

Hollywood, out!

originally posted by: Assassin82

originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed

originally posted by: Assassin82

originally posted by: 1point92AU

originally posted by: Sublimecraft
a reply to: Sabrechucker

Well, they're not native to any one particular country and their stories transcend generations of humans so there is something real and tangible, yet elusive, to it all.

IMO

Check this from last month............

Woman claims that Australia’s version of BIGFOOT tried to attack her

‘It was 7ft tall, growling and had hairy breasts’: Woman claims a YOWIE tried to attack her on a country road – before she fought it off with a cricket bat
Woman claims she saw a yowie on March 5 in Nimbin, New South Wales at 7pm
She claims she came across the mysterious creature after her cricket training
She was urinating behind some bushes when she heard a strange sound
The woman howled to see if a wild animal was hiding within behind the trees
Huge beast supposedly came running running toward her grunting and growling

Yowie is one of several names for an Australian folklore entity reputed to live in the Outback. The creature has its roots in Aboriginal oral history. In parts of Queensland, they are known as quinkin (or as a type of quinkin), and as joogabinna, in parts of New South Wales they are called Ghindaring, jurrawarra, myngawin, puttikan, doolaga, gulaga and thoolagal. Other names include yaroma, noocoonah, wawee, pangkarlangu, jimbra and tjangara. Yowie-type creatures are common in Aboriginal Australian legends, particularly in the eastern Australian states.

The yowie is usually described as a hairy and ape-like creature standing upright at between 2.1 m (6 ft 11 in) and 3.6 m (12 ft). The yowie's feet are described as much larger than a human's, but alleged yowie tracks are inconsistent in shape and toe number, and the descriptions of yowie foot and footprints provided by yowie witnesses are even more varied than those of bigfoot. The yowie's nose is described as wide and flat. Behaviourally, some report the yowie as timid or shy. Others describe the yowie as sometimes violent or aggressive.

en.wikipedia.org...

Good article. The irony is the deniers always clamor for "clear pictures" or "physical evidence". Even thought these are stock images they are part of the collection from the Yowie Research Group. So here we have both in the form of an exceptionally clear photo and a physical foot print. Now it could be a fake. There is always that possibility. However, my point is no matter what evidence is presented the deniers will always explain the evidence away.

People today are so galvanized with their belief system they close off their ability to grow and evolve.

There’s more evidence of a sponge who lived in a pineapple under the sea than there is of an actual, living and breathing Bigfoot.

Hours and hours of footage. It’s hard to believe, but I’ve seen the video. Gotta be true.

Please show that evidence of that sponge living in a pineapple under the sea.

Patrick is the coolest starfish in existence. What I wouldn't give to hang out with him with some beer, potato chips, and a bong.

a reply to: Assassin82

As I suspected, you're a believer in fantasies and animated cartoons as reality.

I totally understand your fear.

a reply to: Assassin82

Who are the sources you've researched on the subject? Since you are making absolute statements regarding denial we can assume you are very well read on the subject. Is that a fair assumption we can make?

You're very well read on the subject which is what has allowed you to arrive at the conclusions you have. Is this correct or not?

originally posted by: 1point92AU
a reply to: Assassin82

Who are the sources you've researched on the subject? Since you are making absolute statements regarding denial we can assume you are very well read on the subject. Is that a fair assumption we can make?

You're very well read on the subject which is what has allowed you to arrive at the conclusions you have. Is this correct or not?

Look man,

I’m not gonna keep doing this with you. You believe there’s a creature that exists that is not officially recognized as a real species. Yet you offer absolutely zero credible and definitive proof of its existence while at the same time putting the responsibility on me to prove your theory right. That’s not how this works. I don’t have to prove you right. If you want people to believe you, you prove it. Until then, I’ve got a movie to go watch about walking and talking gorillas.

a reply to: Assassin82

I like the one about white gorillas who smash people's heads with two flat stones.

Splat.

a reply to: Assassin82

What you're doing is proving that you have no idea what you are talking about when you make an absolute statement that you cannot back up. I asked you a legitimate question. You are nothing more than a denier who likes to come into threads and make smart ass comments and then cry when you are challenged.

If you want to validate your claims of absolute knowledge that proves the phenomena is a myth then state what sources you have used to arrive at that conclusion.

I can provide my sources. Why can't you?

EDIT: I could care less if anyone "believes" me on anything. LOL...that's YOUR ego deflection upon me. What I am really good at is exposing the hypocrisy of people like you who come into threads and make lame comments and then cry when they are challenged.

a reply to: 1point92AU

I can provide my sources.

Have you done so?

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: 1point92AU

I can provide my sources.

Have you done so?

If you want in on the discussion then quote your sources that disprove the phenomena. Otherwise remain on the sideline in your little safe space.

Once the two of you quote your sources that prove the phenomena is non-existent I will provide mine that prove otherwise.

a reply to: 1point92AU

Once the two of you quote your sources that prove the phenomena is non-existent I will provide mine that prove otherwise.

Yeah. That whole "prove I'm wrong" thing doesn't really fly. Prove that unicorns don't exist, for example.

If you have evidence present it. Please? Pretty please? With ice cream on top?

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: 1point92AU

Once the two of you quote your sources that prove the phenomena is non-existent I will provide mine that prove otherwise.

Yeah. That whole "prove I'm wrong" thing doesn't really fly.

It does when you make the claim (or infer) that something doesn't exist. That poster made a smart ass comment inferring they don't exist. Therefore he needs to validate his claim. To be clear...that poster interjected into a post I made to another poster so he definitely needs to validate his claim as now do you since you see fit to interject as well.

I'm fully capable of validating my belief they exist but I want to see which sources he (now you as well) uses that proves the phenomena does not exist.

Prove that unicorns don't exist, for example.

Terrible attempt at "logic". You're referring to the mythical white pony depicted with rainbows and light blue eyes. Of course they don't exist and no sane person would make an attempt to claim otherwise. However, the Siberian Unicorn was a real animal and we have physical proof they exist.

If the two of you need to PM each other for comfort please do so.

a reply to: 1point92AU

Prove that unicorns don't exist, for example.

Good to see you get my point.

Care to post your evidence that bigfoots exist?

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: 1point92AU

Prove that unicorns don't exist, for example.

Good to see you get my point.

Care to post your evidence that bigfoots exist?

LOL...your comprehension is fading along with you.

a reply to: 1point92AU




So, no evidence on your part?